Recent content by Spectrobozo

will the AMD HD5000 series be ever supported for ASIC reading?

I've seen a good number of 5750 (6750) with slow DDR3 on the market, originally the card had DDR5 at 4600MHz (1150), but I found cards (juniper le, 720sps) with DDR3 at 1600MHz :laugh: HIS H675FS1G Radeon HD 6750 1GB 128-bit DDR3 PCI E... not as bad as a GTS 450 with 64bit 1000MHz (500)...

maybe they are just not ready to "kill" gf106/116 cards yet, plenty of stocks of GTS 450/GTX 550 Ti... DDR5 helps quite a lot for this cards, try to find a DDR3 GTS 450 or HD5700 review and you will see...

the overclocking test makes no sense, the overclock was probably not fully stable, you should try something lower to observe the gain...

I remember some people complaining about HT causing some trouble, stuttering in some games, maybe they tested it with HT on in one of these games? because it doesn't make any sense, so you will probably need find another factor to explain,

this thread is 158 days old and these cards are largely available now, anyone have the files to share, more specifically the "HIS HD 6750 fan" ;)

that's terrible, if they could keep the clocks at 750Mhz for the GPU and something like 900MHz for the DDR3 at least it would be much closer, but 625/666 is killing the performance... it's a shame that almost all the 6450 are like this one... but probably there are some with even lower memory...

1.6ghz single core :laugh: the worst part is that it's impossible to overclock these things, I'm sure it would be possible to work at 4ghz+ without to much effort and it would perform quite well, in the old days you could run a Celeron e3300 at 4ghz on a VERY cheap MB, now... even if...

the performance is not the same, the GT 240 is faster... GT 240 = 8 ROPs and 32 TMUs GF108 = 4 ROPs and 16 TMUs both have 96 "cuda cores", although the gf108 supports DX11 and had some other improvements, it is slower... not so exciting when we are talking about a 2009 cheap card (GT240)...

GTX 260? this thing is slower than a 8800GTS (640/320mb) based on the g80 from 2006, slower than a 9600GT... poor gf108... only 4ROPs and 16TMUs... really exciting an overclocked GT 430 :ohwell: the OEM GT 440 is a much better card (based on gf106)

you can try riva tuner, I remember that I disabled 16sps from my 8600GT using riva tuner, so maybe if the units are there and not damaged/locked RT can do it, but I think it's not gonna be possible... (I disabled 16sps to find what was the problem with my card, and in that case it solved)

wow, very well made.

press TAB

yes... this can make sense to some users, let's say the guy have a 939 PC, with a 939 cpu + ddr1 and a old AGP vga, the motherboard stops working, so he can buy this thing and put the system working again, and with lower power consumption and a more modern "gpu" (with dx9c, DX10 and UVD2)...