• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Radeon HD 4870 X2, HD 4850 X2 Faster and Better Than GeForce GTX 295, 285: AMD

Weer

New Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2007
Messages
1,417 (0.23/day)
Location
New York / Israel
System Name //////////////////////////////////////Crunching/Folding Builds\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Processor Q8400@ 4.0Ghz | Q6600 @ 3.6Ghz | E7300 @ 3.8Ghz | E5300 @ 4.3Ghz | E5300 @ 3.9Ghz | E2180 @ 2.0Ghz |
Motherboard ASUS P5Q-E | Asus P5Q Pro | Gigabyte EG45-DS2H | Gigabyte EP35-DS3H | Gigabyte NV73 | E-Sonic P35-G
Cooling TRUE [Lapped] | TRUE | Thermalright SI-128 | Stock | Stock | Stock
Memory G.Skill 8192MB @ 1066Mhz | G.Skill 4096MB | OCZ 2048MB | G.Skill 2048MB | PNY 2048MB | OCZ 1024MB
Video Card(s) GTX 280 + 8800 GTS 512 | 9800 GX2 + 8800 GTS 512 | 6600 GT | 8800 GS | 9600 GSO 512
Storage G.Skill 64GB SSD (OS) | Segate 750GB [Downloads] | 5TB JBOD [Movies] | 3TB JBOD [Else] | 1.5TB [Ex]
Display(s) QUAD Monitors: Dell 2007FP [20"] + Dell 3007WFP-HC [30"] + Dell 2007FP [20"] | Dell 2407WFP-HC [24"]
Case Antec P190 | Antec Three-Hundred | Antec NSK2400 | Thermaltake Strike MX | HEC 6T10 | HEC 8K01
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi XtremeGamer PCI + [Audiophile HD600] + [Creative G500 + Logitech X-530 = 10 speakers]
Power Supply OCZ 750w [62A] | OCZ 750w [62A] | Antec 380w [31A] | Antec 650w [54A] | OCZ 400w [33A] | GeN [20A]
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit + Windows XP 64-bit | Windows Vista SP2 64-bit | Windows 7 RTM 64-bit
Benchmark Scores ////////////////////////////////66,666 [Crunching] + 45,455 [Folding]\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Wow, that's just cheap.

They purposefully set Crysis @ 2560x1600 with 4xAA, knowing that at exactly that setting the GTX 295 crumbles only because of memory capacity, and then yell at our faces bluntly provoking the lie that the 4870X2 is better.

Simply unbelievable.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,472 (4.25/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64


Sorry ATi, no matter how you spin it, when impartial independant people analyze your products, your top end Dual-Core solution is matched by nVidia's Single-Core solution.

How about you stop putting so much money into BS marketing, and actually come out with a competitive product, there is no reason you shouldn't be able to do this. Not a product that matches last generation's products from your competitor, an actual competitive product. I'm being totally serious here, I really want ATi to start competiting. The consumer needs competition at the highest level. You have put out such great products in the past, and RV770 was a step in the right direction, but not a big enough step. And now, to top everything off, your letting your drivers degrade. I expect so much more.
 

TheMailMan78

Big Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
22,599 (3.68/day)
Location
'Merica. The Great SOUTH!
System Name TheMailbox 5.0 / The Mailbox 4.5
Processor RYZEN 1700X / Intel i7 2600k @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard Fatal1ty X370 Gaming K4 / Gigabyte Z77X-UP5 TH Intel LGA 1155
Cooling MasterLiquid PRO 280 / Scythe Katana 4
Memory ADATA RGB 16GB DDR4 2666 16-16-16-39 / G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB DDR3 1866: 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) MSI 1080 "Duke" with 8Gb of RAM. Boost Clock 1847 MHz / ASUS 780ti
Storage 256Gb M4 SSD / 128Gb Agelity 4 SSD , 500Gb WD (7200)
Display(s) LG 29" Class 21:9 UltraWide® IPS LED Monitor 2560 x 1080 / Dell 27"
Case Cooler Master MASTERBOX 5t / Cooler Master 922 HAF
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1220 Audio Codec / SupremeFX X-Fi with Bose Companion 2 speakers.
Power Supply Seasonic FOCUS Plus Series SSR-750PX 750W Platinum / SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei (RAW) / Logitech G5
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow / Logitech (Unknown)
Software Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
Benchmark Scores Benching is for bitches.
As wrong as this is on AMDs part I think its on par for the market. Everyone pulls this crap. The 4870x2 is a great card without a doubt. I wish they didn't do this however. No matter how good the card is this kind of marketing only appeals to fanboys and turns guys like me off.
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
46,283 (7.69/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
and RV770 was a step in the right direction, but not a big enough step.

It was. You're getting a GTX 285 at ~$400 and GTX 295 for $99 more, thanks to the RV770 and products based on it. That being said, the GT200b is a step in the right direction, but it was more or less brought to reality thanks to the competition ATI brought in. Building high-end GPUs on 55nm process wasn't really part of NVIDIA's long-term plans. The GT200 was to hold ground until GT212, built on the 40nm process.
 

TheMailMan78

Big Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
22,599 (3.68/day)
Location
'Merica. The Great SOUTH!
System Name TheMailbox 5.0 / The Mailbox 4.5
Processor RYZEN 1700X / Intel i7 2600k @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard Fatal1ty X370 Gaming K4 / Gigabyte Z77X-UP5 TH Intel LGA 1155
Cooling MasterLiquid PRO 280 / Scythe Katana 4
Memory ADATA RGB 16GB DDR4 2666 16-16-16-39 / G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB DDR3 1866: 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) MSI 1080 "Duke" with 8Gb of RAM. Boost Clock 1847 MHz / ASUS 780ti
Storage 256Gb M4 SSD / 128Gb Agelity 4 SSD , 500Gb WD (7200)
Display(s) LG 29" Class 21:9 UltraWide® IPS LED Monitor 2560 x 1080 / Dell 27"
Case Cooler Master MASTERBOX 5t / Cooler Master 922 HAF
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1220 Audio Codec / SupremeFX X-Fi with Bose Companion 2 speakers.
Power Supply Seasonic FOCUS Plus Series SSR-750PX 750W Platinum / SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei (RAW) / Logitech G5
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow / Logitech (Unknown)
Software Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
Benchmark Scores Benching is for bitches.
What I dont understand is they have the "vanilla" HD4850 so low on the food chain. It's an awesome card!
 

CDdude55

Crazy 4 TPU!!!
Joined
Jul 12, 2007
Messages
8,178 (1.34/day)
Location
Virginia
System Name CDdude's Rig!
Processor AMD Athlon II X4 620
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3
Cooling Corsair H70
Memory 8GB Corsair Vengence @1600mhz
Video Card(s) XFX HD 6970 2GB
Storage OCZ Agility 3 60GB SSD/WD Velociraptor 300GB
Display(s) ASUS VH232H 23" 1920x1080
Case Cooler Master CM690 (w/ side window)
Audio Device(s) Onboard (It sounds fine)
Power Supply Corsair 850TX
Software Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit SP1
Dones't matter to me, there both still X2 Expensive.:(
 
Joined
Feb 26, 2008
Messages
4,876 (0.83/day)
Location
Joplin, Mo
System Name Ultrabeast GX2
Processor Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 @ 4.0GHZ 24/7
Motherboard Gigabit P35-DS3L
Cooling Rosewill RX24, Dual Slot Vid, Fan control
Memory 2x1gb 1066mhz@850MHZ DDR2
Video Card(s) 9800GX2 @ 690/1040
Storage 750/250/250/200 all WD 7200
Display(s) 24" DCLCD 2ms 1200p
Case Apevia
Audio Device(s) 7.1 Digital on-board, 5.1 digital hooked up
Power Supply 700W RAIDMAXXX SLI
Software winXP Pro
Benchmark Scores 17749 3DM06
doesnt the 4870x2 own all at high resolutions? why on earth would you be playing with a GTX295 on 1440x900? in this respect, the 4870x2 wins.
That doesn't say that this isnt a bunch of marketing bologni, though.
 
Joined
Jun 21, 2006
Messages
900 (0.14/day)
Location
Canada
System Name MurderBox #17
Processor Intel Core i7 5930k - 4.5Ghz 1.275v - Bitspower Summit EF
Motherboard Asus X99-E WS - Bitspower THOR AIX99 Full Full Board Block
Cooling SR-1 480, 8x Corsair ML120 , MCP350, I&H Res 250, PETG hard pipe, Mayhems Pastel White
Memory 32GB G.Skill Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2666
Video Card(s) Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti Founders Edition - EK Fullcover waterblock with Backplate
Storage 970 Pro 512GB, 960 EVO 500GB, PM961 512GB, 3x SM951 256GB,, WD Black 2TB, Seagate 4TB
Display(s) ASUS PG348Q 3440x1440, 2X ASUS PB278 2560x1440
Case MurderMod TJ07 With Illuminated mid-plate
Audio Device(s) Schiit Bifrost > Schiit Asgard > Hifiman HE400i - Audio Technica AT2020
Power Supply Corsair AX1200i With custom MDPC Sleeve and Noctua NF-A14 iPPC-3000 PWM
Mouse Steelseries Rival 600
Keyboard Corsair K95 RGB
Software Microsoft Windows 10 Professional 64bit
I don't see why everybody is getting so bent out of shape about this. Both companies do this to each other all the time and this time AMD is just trying to make their product look more appealing because they know they nvidia has the faster card. The 4870x2 has been out for quite some time and it only makes sense for the new nvidia dual card solution to be hands down faster. ATI will attempt to hit them back when the R870 is ready and nvidia will probably do the same with their next card a few months following that.

It has been going like this since the companies entered the market and that is the way it will always be until one company bows out. Competition is good but I hate this kind of smear marketing and it doesn't matter which company does it.

Using this as an excuse to flame the crap out of ATI for this is a bit much because all they are trying to do is sell their product even though some of the slides are pretty questionable.
 
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
10,209 (1.71/day)
Location
Austin Texas
Processor 13700KF Undervolted @ 5.6/ 5.5, 4.8Ghz Ring 200W PL1
Motherboard MSI 690-I PRO
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 w/ Arctic P12 Fans
Memory 48 GB DDR5 7600 MHZ CL36
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 FE
Storage 2x 2TB WDC SN850, 1TB Samsung 960 prr
Display(s) Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED
Case SLIGER S620
Audio Device(s) Yes
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse Xlite V2
Keyboard RoyalAxe
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores They're pretty good, nothing crazy.
doesnt the 4870x2 own all at high resolutions? why on earth would you be playing with a GTX295 on 1440x900? in this respect, the 4870x2 wins.
That doesn't say that this isnt a bunch of marketing bologni, though.

It does not. Only rarely at the highest resolution because the 295 can only use 896 MB of ram and the 4870X2 has 1024MB of usable ram. - When both cards run out of framebuffer, that extra 128MB of ram will put it ahead.
 

EastCoasthandle

New Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2005
Messages
6,885 (1.00/day)
System Name MY PC
Processor E8400 @ 3.80Ghz > Q9650 3.60Ghz
Motherboard Maximus Formula
Cooling D5, 7/16" ID Tubing, Maze4 with Fuzion CPU WB
Memory XMS 8500C5D @ 1066MHz
Video Card(s) HD 2900 XT 858/900 to 4870 to 5870 (Keep Vreg area clean)
Storage 2
Display(s) 24"
Case P180
Audio Device(s) X-fi Plantinum
Power Supply Silencer 750
Software XP Pro SP3 to Windows 7
Benchmark Scores This varies from one driver to another.
Interesting, I wonder if there will be a review showing benchmarks between the 2 at 2560 using 8xAA, 16xAF ;) using cat 9.1?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 28, 2008
Messages
20 (0.00/day)
Location
Yuma, Arizona
Processor i7 920 @ 4ghz
Motherboard ASUS P6T Deluxe V2
Cooling TRU120E
Memory G.Skill 12Gb DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) XFX HD6950
Storage Velociraptor & Seagate 320Gb
Display(s) ASUS MK241H
Case Antec P182
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Audigy 2
Power Supply Corsair 850TX
Could be fake. I tried looking for it on AMDs website and I cant find nothing of that.
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
46,283 (7.69/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Could be fake. I tried looking for it on AMDs website and I cant find nothing of that.

It's not a public presentation and will never feature on the company website.
 

leonard_222003

New Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2006
Messages
241 (0.04/day)
System Name Home
Processor Q6600 @ 3300
Motherboard Gigabyte p31 ds3l
Cooling TRUE Intel Edition
Memory 4 gb x 800 mhz
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 560
Storage WD 1x250 gb Seagate 2x 1tb
Display(s) samsung T220
Case no name
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply chieftec 550w
Software Windows 7 64
I think they made some improvements to catalyst 9.1 and give some better scores in crysis and other games.
http://www.behardware.com/news/10055/dx10-catalyst-9-1-quad.html
They both have preety powerfull hardware and there is much to be tweaked from drivers to get more perf. , the hardware is good , the drivers need more work to get more perf..
Funny thing , crysis , a game made to showcase Nvidia hardware is present in Ati's slides to show their superiority , hahaha.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2007
Messages
3,688 (0.62/day)
Location
Ohio
System Name Felix777
Processor Core i5-3570k@stock
Motherboard Biostar H61
Memory 8gb
Video Card(s) XFX RX 470
Storage WD 500GB BLK
Display(s) Acer p236h bd
Case Haf 912
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Rosewill CAPSTONE 450watt
Software Win 10 x64
I don't find a problem with these results at all, though i'm not sure i trust these numbers, if ATI have new catalyst drivers 9.1 and they've enabled their sideport on the HD 4870x2 then i think it's possible that the HD 4870x2 is beating the GTX 295, though i don't really trust it to beat it by those margins. Also i read some of you saying "well they tested at high resolutions, the GTX 295's weak point". WHO IN THE HELL is going to buy these cards unless they are playing at high resolutions? These are enthusiast, top of the line graphic cards, they're meant for high resolutions, so the fact that they used 1920x1200 and 2560x1600 makes perfect sense to me. As for the marketing ploy, who cares, what company doesn't in some way try to put down their competition?
 
Joined
May 5, 2008
Messages
3,318 (0.57/day)
Location
Dallas, Tx
Processor Intel i5-3570K @ 3.4Ghz
Motherboard Asrock LGA1155 Z77 Extreme 4
Cooling Cooler Master Evo 212
Memory 16GB (4X4) G.Skill Ripjaw 2 DDR3-1600
Video Card(s) Nvidia gForce GTX 660ti
Storage 1x Samsung 840 EVO 256GB 6Gb/s, 1x WD 500GB 6Gb/s, 1x WD 80GB 3Gb/s
Display(s) ASUS VH242H Black + 2 HP 2311x 23" LED
Case Fractal Design R4
Audio Device(s) Realtek OnBoard Both
Power Supply Cooler Master 850w
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit SP1
There just showing of what there card can do. As most of us know some cards do good and some don't. ATI is just pointing out of what the card can do. As you know, some games are made with certain cards, and some games play better on a Nvidia card and some play better on a ATI card. I have see this with my 4850X2. But we are just going to have to wait and see Nvidia's response and see if ATI tries to come out with anything else.

I say there is no point in arguing over this and getting heated. I will say that Nvidia is winning, but ATI is just trying to come back and showing the public what there cards can do... I think that is called marketing?
 

leonard_222003

New Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2006
Messages
241 (0.04/day)
System Name Home
Processor Q6600 @ 3300
Motherboard Gigabyte p31 ds3l
Cooling TRUE Intel Edition
Memory 4 gb x 800 mhz
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 560
Storage WD 1x250 gb Seagate 2x 1tb
Display(s) samsung T220
Case no name
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply chieftec 550w
Software Windows 7 64
I don't find a problem with these results at all, though i'm not sure i trust these numbers, if ATI have new catalyst drivers 9.1 and they've enabled their sideport on the HD 4870x2 then i think it's possible that the HD 4870x2 is beating the GTX 295, though i don't really trust it to beat it by those margins. Also i read some of you saying "well they tested at high resolutions, the GTX 295's weak point". WHO IN THE HELL is going to buy these cards unless they are playing at high resolutions? These are enthusiast, top of the line graphic cards, they're meant for high resolutions, so the fact that they used 19020x1080 and 2560x1600 makes perfect sense to me. As for the marketing ploy, who cares, what company doesn't in some way try to put down their competition?

Exactly , it's not like you buy a card like this to play at 1280x1024 , it's just overkill.
Even testing in low resolution these cards is pointless but they follow the routine.
 
Joined
Sep 2, 2005
Messages
294 (0.04/day)
Location
Szekszárd, Hungary
Processor AMD Phenom II X4 955BE
Motherboard Asus M4A785TD-V Evo
Cooling Xigmatek HDT S1283
Memory 4GB Kingston Hyperx DDR3
Video Card(s) GigaByte Radeon HD3870 512MB GDDR4
Storage WD Caviar Black 640GB, Hitachi Deskstar T7K250 250GB
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster F2380M
Audio Device(s) Creative Audigy ES 5.1
Power Supply Corsair VX550
Software Microsoft Windows 7 Professional x64


Sorry ATi, no matter how you spin it, when impartial independant people analyze your products, your top end Dual-Core solution is matched by nVidia's Single-Core solution.

How about you stop putting so much money into BS marketing, and actually come out with a competitive product, there is no reason you shouldn't be able to do this. Not a product that matches last generation's products from your competitor, an actual competitive product. I'm being totally serious here, I really want ATi to start competiting. The consumer needs competition at the highest level. You have put out such great products in the past, and RV770 was a step in the right direction, but not a big enough step. And now, to top everything off, your letting your drivers degrade. I expect so much more.

Lol, what is that graph? gtx295 is 11% faster than gtx285? :D
 

EastCoasthandle

New Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2005
Messages
6,885 (1.00/day)
System Name MY PC
Processor E8400 @ 3.80Ghz > Q9650 3.60Ghz
Motherboard Maximus Formula
Cooling D5, 7/16" ID Tubing, Maze4 with Fuzion CPU WB
Memory XMS 8500C5D @ 1066MHz
Video Card(s) HD 2900 XT 858/900 to 4870 to 5870 (Keep Vreg area clean)
Storage 2
Display(s) 24"
Case P180
Audio Device(s) X-fi Plantinum
Power Supply Silencer 750
Software XP Pro SP3 to Windows 7
Benchmark Scores This varies from one driver to another.
If graphic card manufacture(s) are cutting their order with the competition (along with some no longer being exclusive to the competition) then this information may in fact be working.
 
Joined
Feb 9, 2007
Messages
696 (0.11/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name Quiet Gaming PC v5
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 5600
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 Aorus Elite V2 (rev. 1.2)
Cooling Thermalright TRUE Rev. C
Memory 2x16GB TeamGroup Vulcan Z Red DDR4-3600 CL18
Video Card(s) XFX Speedster SWFT 309 RX 6700 XT
Storage WD Blue SN550 1TB NVMe // TeamGroup MP34 4TB NVMe // Crucial MX100 512GB
Display(s) MSI G27CQ4 E2
Case Fractal Design Define R4
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1200
Power Supply Corsair RM850x
Mouse Logitech G502 Hero
Keyboard MKPlus Slayer M3 RGB Mechanical Keyboard
Software Windows 11 Pro
What part of INTERNAL PRESENTATION do you people not understand? Nvidia does the same shit, Intel does the same shit.
 

leonard_222003

New Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2006
Messages
241 (0.04/day)
System Name Home
Processor Q6600 @ 3300
Motherboard Gigabyte p31 ds3l
Cooling TRUE Intel Edition
Memory 4 gb x 800 mhz
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 560
Storage WD 1x250 gb Seagate 2x 1tb
Display(s) samsung T220
Case no name
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply chieftec 550w
Software Windows 7 64
What part of INTERNAL PRESENTATION do you people not understand? Nvidia does the same shit, Intel does the same shit.

They need to lie , otherwise they can't be in this bussines for too long :).
 

department76

New Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2008
Messages
519 (0.09/day)
Location
U of WY, USA
System Name Fusilli
Processor AMD Phenom II 965 C3 @ 3.9GHz (200x19.5, 1.51V)
Motherboard MSI K9A2 Platinum 790FX/SB600 (AM2+)
Cooling Zalman 9700NT, 2x silent 80mm & 2x 120mm Scythe & Enermax
Memory 4GB Patriot Viper DDR2 @ 1066 5-5-5-15 2.1V
Video Card(s) Sapphire HD4870 512MB @ 825/1050 (3x heatpipes)
Storage 2x 250GB RAID 0 - Seagate 7200.10 16MB on Promise FastTrak
Display(s) ViewSonic VX2450 & VX1940
Case Lian-Li PC60 PlusII
Audio Device(s) Auzen X-Fi Prelude, Denon AH-D1000 headphones
Power Supply OCZ GameXtreme 600W
Software Windows 7 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores 3DMark Vantage - P10909
Lol, what is that graph? gtx295 is 11% faster than gtx285? :D

gtx285 --> gtx295
+11% performance
+25% price

that's why i don't buy enthusiast... same with intel core extreme stuff, or any intel. usually AMD/ATI is much better for the money you actually pay.
 
Joined
Jan 19, 2009
Messages
331 (0.06/day)
Location
New York, NY
System Name The Baconator
Processor Phenom II X4 965 @ 4.00GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-790FX
Cooling Zalman 9900 CPU Cooler
Memory 16Gb DDR3 @ 1600MHz
Video Card(s) ATi Radeon HD 5870
Storage OS: WD 300Gb @ 10,000rpm. Storage: 2 x 1Tb @ 7,200rpm
Display(s) ASUS 27" LED 1080p Monitor
Case Cooler Master Sniper Medium Tower
Audio Device(s) MoBo Integrated
Power Supply Corsair PSU 750W
Software Windows 7 Ultimate x64
I don't find a problem with these results at all, though i'm not sure i trust these numbers, if ATI have new catalyst drivers 9.1 and they've enabled their sideport on the HD 4870x2 then i think it's possible that the HD 4870x2 is beating the GTX 295, though i don't really trust it to beat it by those margins. Also i read some of you saying "well they tested at high resolutions, the GTX 295's weak point". WHO IN THE HELL is going to buy these cards unless they are playing at high resolutions? These are enthusiast, top of the line graphic cards, they're meant for high resolutions, so the fact that they used 1920x1200 and 2560x1600 makes perfect sense to me. As for the marketing ploy, who cares, what company doesn't in some way try to put down their competition?

You said it partner.

I think it's better for people to think 4870 X2 = GTX 295. Unless you're freaking testing your hardware by milliseconds and digits below 0.01, the usual gamer won't see a damn difference. We're not comparing a GeForce 8600 with the 4870 X2 here, but instead the two TOP OF THE LINE video cards in the market. Doesn't matter which one can give you an extra frame per second. You can't go wrong between these two, at least that's how I see it.
 
Joined
Sep 2, 2005
Messages
294 (0.04/day)
Location
Szekszárd, Hungary
Processor AMD Phenom II X4 955BE
Motherboard Asus M4A785TD-V Evo
Cooling Xigmatek HDT S1283
Memory 4GB Kingston Hyperx DDR3
Video Card(s) GigaByte Radeon HD3870 512MB GDDR4
Storage WD Caviar Black 640GB, Hitachi Deskstar T7K250 250GB
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster F2380M
Audio Device(s) Creative Audigy ES 5.1
Power Supply Corsair VX550
Software Microsoft Windows 7 Professional x64

EastCoasthandle

New Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2005
Messages
6,885 (1.00/day)
System Name MY PC
Processor E8400 @ 3.80Ghz > Q9650 3.60Ghz
Motherboard Maximus Formula
Cooling D5, 7/16" ID Tubing, Maze4 with Fuzion CPU WB
Memory XMS 8500C5D @ 1066MHz
Video Card(s) HD 2900 XT 858/900 to 4870 to 5870 (Keep Vreg area clean)
Storage 2
Display(s) 24"
Case P180
Audio Device(s) X-fi Plantinum
Power Supply Silencer 750
Software XP Pro SP3 to Windows 7
Benchmark Scores This varies from one driver to another.
Joined
Sep 2, 2005
Messages
294 (0.04/day)
Location
Szekszárd, Hungary
Processor AMD Phenom II X4 955BE
Motherboard Asus M4A785TD-V Evo
Cooling Xigmatek HDT S1283
Memory 4GB Kingston Hyperx DDR3
Video Card(s) GigaByte Radeon HD3870 512MB GDDR4
Storage WD Caviar Black 640GB, Hitachi Deskstar T7K250 250GB
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster F2380M
Audio Device(s) Creative Audigy ES 5.1
Power Supply Corsair VX550
Software Microsoft Windows 7 Professional x64
Top