Wile E
Power User
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2006
- Messages
- 24,318 (3.77/day)
System Name | The ClusterF**k |
---|---|
Processor | 980X @ 4Ghz |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 BIOS F12 |
Cooling | MCR-320, DDC-1 pump w/Bitspower res top (1/2" fittings), Koolance CPU-360 |
Memory | 3x2GB Mushkin Redlines 1600Mhz 6-8-6-24 1T |
Video Card(s) | Evga GTX 580 |
Storage | Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB, 2xSeagate 320GB RAID0; 2xSeagate 3TB; 2xSamsung 2TB; Samsung 1.5TB |
Display(s) | HP LP2475w 24" 1920x1200 IPS |
Case | Technofront Bench Station |
Audio Device(s) | Auzentech X-Fi Forte into Onkyo SR606 and Polk TSi200's + RM6750 |
Power Supply | ENERMAX Galaxy EVO EGX1250EWT 1250W |
Software | Win7 Ultimate N x64, OSX 10.8.4 |
There's a difference between you and me. Your own legal system and government backs me up on this. And the rest in the world, of course.
My legal system does not call rebates illegal. And the rest of the world's legal system is inconsequential in this case, and still doesn't make it right anyway.
Just drop it. We disagree completely, and it's going to stay that way until new facts are introduced.
My opinion is that they did nothing wrong, and even if they did break the law, the law is flawed and needs changed. Plain and simple.
You opinion is that they are guilty of wrong doing, and that the law is just. Plain and simple.
Does that about sum it up?