• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Mitsubishi Electric Releases New Diamondcrysta WIDE 23-inch Monitor

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,670 (7.43/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Mitsubishi Electric released the Diamondcrysta WIDE RDT232WX. This 23-inch LCD display comes in two variants, that with glossy screen, and that with a matte (anti-glare) screen. The panel has a resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels with 3.8 ms of response time (GTG), 1000:1 contrast ratio (5000:1 dynamic), 300 cd/m², and 3W stereo speakers. Inputs include DVI, D-Sub, and HDMI. The variant with the glossy screen will be priced at US $464 and that with the matte screen at $484, when the two release later this month in Japan.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
What panels do these have? If it's anything less than IPS, it's a ripoff.
 
Considering it's 3,8ms with GTG rating, i'd say it's IPS. Most of TN's have 2ms GTG or even less.
Besides, TN for over 400 bucks is not really realistic...
 
Considering it's 3,8ms with GTG rating, i'd say it's IPS. Most of TN's have 2ms GTG or even less.
Besides, TN for over 400 bucks is not really realistic...

Most TN are listed as 5ms, most IPS are listed as 6ms. I haven't seen a single IPS panel rated this low.

I think they are either Tn film, and Mitsu is charging a really exorbitant price for them, or it's IPS, and Mitsu is severely overstating their response times.

Either way, it's a poor choice on their part.
 
whats up with all these new "COMPUTER MONITORS" coming out with high Ms's Its rediculous i was buying monitors 8-9 years ago with faster MS's, *sigh*
 
whats up with all these new "COMPUTER MONITORS" coming out with high Ms's Its rediculous i was buying monitors 8-9 years ago with faster MS's, *sigh*

because they were lying about it back then.


not too bad a price for IPS, but i wouldnt buy a new screen without display port.
 
Whats the diff from Tn and IPS?:confused:
 
all i was wandering is tn look nicer? which it does sound like it
 
Once a pond a time Mitsubishi had the best crt & tv's, from that I would try one & do think this new product does what's stated.
 
all i was wandering is tn look nicer? which it does sound like it

No, IPS looks better. Tn is just cheaper.
whats up with all these new "COMPUTER MONITORS" coming out with high Ms's Its rediculous i was buying monitors 8-9 years ago with faster MS's, *sigh*
If you actually believe the ms and contrast ratings any manufacturer gives you, you have bigger problems than a slow panel. None of them actually do 2ms, or even 5ms. That is only a best case scenario that they pick to give them better numbers, and that is only between 2 different shades of grey. Problem is, there is no industry standard for what shades of grey to use. The real ms ratings are black to white to black, and are much, much higher than what they want you to see.

They use overdrive to achieve these ratings, and overdrive can cause more problems than it solves when it comes to image quality. Negative ghosting, sparkle artifacts, etc., etc. To get 3.8 out of an IPS panel, they are overdriving it to hell and back, possibly defeating the purpose of buying an IPS panel in the first place, which is image quality.
 
Nasty. Notice how the matte screen is more expensive for the same spec. THAT IS WHY the manufacturers have been pawning glossy screens onto gullible consumers; they are cheaper to make!

Ok, which one of you whippersnappers fell for the "glossy gives blacker Apple blacks" marketing spin?

Welcome back matte screens. Let's hope 2010 brings back 1200 or 1440 or 1600 in the "y".

Ok, which one of you whippersnappers fell for the "widescreen but less y gives you bigger FOV" marketing spin?
 
Glossy just looks like crap.
 
Hey glossy is great for ppl who need to watch there back
 
Back
Top