Review Consensus: AMD FX Processor 8150 Underwhelming

suraswami · Oct 13, 2011

W1zzard said:
but mr. witness protection ... i want sun, beach and bikinis

we can setup a virtual one for you powered by FX processors, it will be so slow and unreal you will already giveup, retire and join the Monks/Saints over there.

3volvedcombat · Oct 13, 2011

Just reading:
http://www.amd.com/US/PRODUCTS/DESKTOP/PROCESSORS/AMDFX/Pages/amdfx.aspx

The features and benefit's are the first thing I see that shows something shady.

Overclock for a big boost......
Get an extra burst of raw speed...... Turbo Core.....
Push your performance with tuning controls.....
Enjoy stable, smoother performance...... (No shit it should be stable and smooth.)

If they practically recommend you to do this, that's the first sign they new what they were doing and they new the performance was going to be Shitty.

Be Epic. Be Brutal. ........
Some kid watching T.V. Ninja Titan's could have thought up that one.
*face palm*

And if it really uses 500+ watts at 4.6Ghz, they can get right the fuck out of here. I don't want to say it like that, but COME on.

FreedomEclipse · Oct 13, 2011

suraswami said:
we can setup a virtual one for you powered by FX processors, it will be so slow and unreal you will already giveup, retire and join the Monks/Saints over there.

Or he can cross the border into Pakistan and set up a huge base with 100 computers for LAN games and 400 sheep on treadmills to provide electicity and air conditioning 5miles away from a goverment building or army camp and no one would ever know he was there.

Not even the Pakistani goverment

btarunr · Oct 13, 2011

W1zzard said:
but mr. witness protection ... i want sun, beach and bikinis

Knowing you, beach destinations are the first places they'll swoop.

[H]@RD5TUFF · Oct 13, 2011

Dent1 said:
Hardware Heaven shows Bulldozer in a positive light. They give it 9/10 overall.

In particular it shows Bulldozer beating the i7 2600k in games. How can this be?

Deus EX
http://www.hardwareheaven.com/revie...i7-2600k-review-deus-ex-human-revolution.html

F1 2011
http://www.hardwareheaven.com/revie...rocessor-vs-core-i7-2600k-review-f1-2011.html

Shogun Total War 2
http://www.hardwareheaven.com/revie...-core-i7-2600k-review-total-war-shogun-2.html

wow 3 whole games. .. .

cadaveca · Oct 13, 2011

[H]@RD5TUFF said:
wow 3 whole games. .. .

I couldn't think of 3 better games...

I gotta say, in the console market, over the past MANY YEARS, developer's have been able to incrementally increase performance by code optimization.

It's pretty obvious by the encoding benchmarks that there's really alot of math power in Bulldozer. You could potentially say it's just under-utilized. It's not like it's really all that bad. It's just a little too ahead of it's time is all. Can I guarantee developer's will take advantage of that math power? Nope.

And those three games are ones that kind of show that very well. And that's why I say that a lot of the reviews seem biased, because not one seems to look to highlight where Bulldozer is a success, and most seem focused on disappointment.

TheMailMan78 · Oct 13, 2011

cadaveca said:
And that's why I say that a lot of the reviews seem biased, because not one seems to look to highlight where Bulldozer is a success, and most seem focused on disappointment.

Much like my parents.

[H]@RD5TUFF · Oct 13, 2011

cadaveca said:
I couldn't think of 3 better games...

I gotta say, in the console market, over the past MANY YEARS, developer's have been able to incrementally increase performance by code optimization.

It's pretty obvious by the encoding benchmarks that there's really alot of math power in Bulldozer. You could potentially say it's just under-utilized. It's not like it's really all that bad. It's just a little too ahead of it's time is all. Can I guarantee developer's will take advantage of that math power? Nope.

And those three games are ones that kind of show that very well. And that's why I say that a lot of the reviews seem biased, because not one seems to look to highlight where Bulldozer is a success, and most seem focused on disappointment.

So the reviews are biased because they aren't looking for the 1 or 2 "positive things", versus the hundreds of disappointing things AMD did with this chip.

SORRY BUT NO! :shadedshu

A real performance chip would have beaten intel in more tests not 3 games . .. :mad:

hence it's fail!

3volvedcombat · Oct 13, 2011

cadaveca said:
I couldn't think of 3 better games...

I gotta say, in the console market, over the past MANY YEARS, developer's have been able to incrementally increase performance by code optimization.

It's pretty obvious by the encoding benchmarks that there's really alot of math power in Bulldozer. You could potentially say it's just under-utilized. It's not like it's really all that bad. It's just a little too ahead of it's time is all. Can I guarantee developer's will take advantage of that math power? Nope.

And those three games are ones that kind of show that very well. And that's why I say that a lot of the reviews seem biased, because not one seems to look to highlight where Bulldozer is a success, and most seem focused on disappointment.

The thing is though, they hyped it way to much already, its already getting announced. They def see every single review on the net, yet most of them are negative.

There AMD, and that is no joke, they should have known about the performance numbers, THERE is no way the could not have known!!!! They tested, they marketed way to extremely and even had some overclocking Guinness record, and by then they new there performance numbers. There is no way this came out of the blue, its impossible with that infrastructure. Impossible.

There is not an excuse that matter's when it come's to the overall number's everybody is seeing. Not optimized is so much bullshit its beyond untrue, they practically guarantied an ENTHUSIAST PRODUCT, they even market it with a HD 6990!!!!!

No ethical way I can see for this seriously being a mistake, or some weird ass optimization problem, AMD knew all along, and they might keep it that way anyways.
There is no excuse for it to be under optimized, AMD knew simple as that. It's there main market and has been sense the 1970's.

So what make's anybody think that its just under optimized yet, they have been pumping out processor's on every window's platforms for a while. There is just no excuse....

TheMailMan78 · Oct 13, 2011

[H]@RD5TUFF said:
wow 3 whole games. .. .

Yeah three of the most heavily multi-threaded games on the market. BD has a shine you guys fail to grasp.

cadaveca · Oct 13, 2011

3volvedcombat said:
The thing is though, they hyped it way to much already, its already getting announced. They def see every single review on the net, yet most of them are negative.

There AMD, and that is no joke, they should have known about the performance numbers, THERE is no way the could not have known!!!! They tested, they marketed way to extremely and even had some overclocking Guinness record, and by then they new there performance numbers. There is no way this came out of the blue, its impossible with that infrastructure. Impossible.

There is not an excuse that matter's when it come's to the overall number's everybody is seeing. Not optimized is so much bullshit its beyond untrue, they practically guarantied an ENTHUSIAST PRODUCT, they even market it with a HD 6990!!!!!

No ethical way I can see for this seriously being a mistake, or some weird ass optimization problem, AMD knew all along, and they might keep it that way anyways.
There is no excuse for it to be under optimized, AMD knew simple as that. It's there main market and has been sense the 1970's.

So what make's anybody think that its just under optimized yet, they have been pumping out processor's on every window's platforms for a while. There is just no excuse....

I cannot excuse some of the marketing. I've been complaining about it for a long time now. There are a lot of good ideas there, they are all just poorly executed.

There's a reason companies do not comment about unreleased products, and yes, AMD very much broke that this time. But, officially, they did an effective job of marketing from the business perspective, because literally every aspect of Bulldozer is something I personally expected. The power consumption, clocking, and performance, are all exactly where expected.

The marketing to the enthusiast failed. The Guinness thing should not have been mentioned except at launch. The FX moniker should have been explained, yet, if look back through Bulldozer posts..I knew what FX meant, but many many others didn't.

I do not understand, why, when adding two cores, and 6 cores weren't used to begin with, that peopel thought that magically there would be more performance. When the cores are used effectively, the 8150 does pull ahead considerably.

The fact these chips use such a high voltage while in max turbo mode, yet live on, no problem, is pretty incredible. The fact they can push 300++ watts through that small of a process is quite amazing, and is part of the reason that things like 8 GHz clocks are possible.

To be completely honest, I don't really see Bulldozer as a failure at all, and frankly, anyone claiming it is, really, is still buying into the hype, because literally everyone is buying into these reviews, and the negative outlook. Clearly there are issues when they are using ES samples for reviews. Why are there so few retail samples?

Nobody gets it. And I'm not about to explain things when it's so bloody obvious.

Oh well, not my problem.

TheMailMan78 · Oct 13, 2011

cadaveca said:
I cannot excuse some of the marketing. I've been complaining about it for a long time now. There are a lot of good ideas there, they are all just poorly executed.

There's a reason companies do not comment about unreleased products, and yes, AMD very much broke that this time. But, officially, they did an effective job of marketing from the business perspective, because literally every aspect of Bulldozer is something I personally expected. The power consumption, clocking, and performance, are all exactly where expected.

The marketing to the enthusiast failed. The Guinness thing should not have been mentioned except at launch. The FX moniker should have been explained, yet, if look back through Bulldozer posts..I knew what FX meant, but many many others didn't.

I do not understand, why, when adding two cores, and 6 cores weren't used to begin with, that peopel thought that magically there would be more performance. When the cores are used effectively, the 8150 does pull ahead considerably.

The fact these chips use such a high voltage while in max turbo mode, yet live on, no problem, is pretty incredible. The fact they can push 300++ watts through that small of a process is quite amazing, and is part of the reason that things like 8 GHz clocks are possible.

To be completely honest, I don't really see Bulldozer as a failure at all, and frankly, anyone claiming it is, really, is still buying into the hype, because literally everyone is buying into these reviews, and the negative outlook. Clearly there are issues when they are using ES samples for reviews. Why are there so few retail samples?

Nobody gets it. And I'm not about to explain things when it's so bloody obvious.

Oh well, not my problem.

RevengE · Oct 13, 2011

I knew it was going to be a fail. I was just waiting for the offical announcement.

CDdude55 · Oct 13, 2011

Going to wait a while to grab an AM3+ chip to put my 990FX board to work i guess, till then i got this to play with

:

Free next delivery ftw! :rockout:

qu4k3r · Oct 13, 2011

I'd like to see more reviews it with all FX cpus included (not 8150 only).
Where is the TPU review of AMD FX Cpu?
Is w1zz still cooking it?
I'm hungry, lol.-

TheMailMan78 · Oct 13, 2011

CDdude55 said:
Going to wait a while to grab an AM3+ chip to put my 990FX board to work i guess, till then i got this to play with :

http://img.techpowerup.org/111013/Capture666678.png

Free next delivery ftw!

Nicely done sir.

Dent1 · Oct 13, 2011

Arguably Bulldozer is the better overall CPU. Granted single threaded performance is poor and makes it perhaps a sceptical choice without a price drop. However in multithreaded applications the Bulldozer often pulls ahead of the i7 Bloomfield and i5 2500K and keeps up with the i7 2600K with ease.

I guess AMD are guilty of releasing the CPU too early. Perhaps if they waited a year or two, say early 2013 to mid 2014 software developers would have moved along with the times to multithreaded coding and results would sway towards AMD's new architecture.

In a away I sort of blame software developers too for holding back current hardware by dragging their feet with multithreaded coding.

Edit:

by cadaveca said:
Clearly there are issues when they are using ES samples for reviews. Why are there so few retail samples

Was Engineering samples really used on the reviews. Isnt that unfair and bias?

LordJummy · Oct 13, 2011

CDdude55 said:
Going to wait a while to grab an AM3+ chip to put my 990FX board to work i guess, till then i got this to play with :

http://img.techpowerup.org/111013/Capture666678.png

Free next delivery ftw!

Performance increase over 470 is not that huge. However, it's a great card. Enjoy it.

If I had an AM3+ board, I would probably buy the 8150 just to test it myself. Have fun though!

TheMailMan78 · Oct 13, 2011

LordJummy said:
Performance increase over 470 is not that huge. However, it's a great card. Enjoy it.

If I had an AM3+ board, I would probably buy the 8150 just to test it myself. Have fun though!

BF3 will prove that statement wrong. That extra VRAM makes a difference in DX11.

cadaveca · Oct 13, 2011

Dent1 said:
Was Engineering samples really used on the reviews. Isnt that unfair and bias?

I would not say unfair and bias, but...

Are you really gonna beleive a company that makes millions of chips couldn't find 50 single retail samples to hand out to reviewers when they said ES chips and retail are different?

And that is all.

Official reviews are equpped with a Crosshair 5 motherboards, a retail chip in the tin, a belt buckle, and a watercooler. If there are not pictures of all of these things, then the review should be ignored.

If the watercooler is NOT used, then the review is invalid, IMHO. If the review uses an ES chip, it is INVALID. I could add several more criteria here, but those two are enough.

CDdude55 · Oct 13, 2011

LordJummy said:
Performance increase over 470 is not that huge. However, it's a great card. Enjoy it.

If I had an AM3+ board, I would probably buy the 8150 just to test it myself. Have fun though!

It fights with the GTX 570s performance plus as mentioned the extra VRAM was a plus. Granted im running at 1080p, but it's never bad to have more of everything, you never know when you'll start running into games that will eat it all up.

I was thinking about getting a 8 core BD chip but it just wasn't worth the cost considering my overclocked X6 1055T pretty much in the same arena as it for now.

I'm also expecting the 6970's power consumption and heat output will be better then my current 470, Fermi runs hot as everybody has come to expect.

Dent1 · Oct 13, 2011

cadaveca said:
Are you really gonna beleive a company that makes millions of chips couldn't find 50 single retail samples to hand out to reviewers when they said ES chips and retail are different?

How can we be sure ES were used in reviews. I read through most of the literature from Tomhshardware, Techspot, Hardware Heaven etc and none of the journalists mention only having Engineering samples available.

Granted some of the literal was extremely long, maybe my eyes missed the parts where they mentioned having ES only.

LordJummy · Oct 13, 2011

CDdude55 said:
It fights with the GTX 570s performance plus as mentioned the extra VRAM was a plus. Granted im running at 1080p, but it's never bad to have more of everything, you never know when you'll start running into games that will eat it all up.

I was thinking about getting a 8 core BD chip but it just wasn't worth the cost considering my overclocked X6 1055T pretty much in the same arena as it for now.

I'm also expecting the 6970's power consumption and heat output will be better then my current 470, Fermi runs hot as everybody has come to expect.

Yeah, I used to run a GTX 470 last year for a month or two. It was a good card. The only reason I started buying 6950's was boredom really. I started reading about the unlocking and wanted eyefinity, etc so I went for it.

The 470 was a great card though. The heat and power was exaggerated a bit by some people, although it is a bit on the warm side. The 6950/6970 reference gets warm too on occasion, and is equally loud. It will outperform the 470 for sure though.

The 6970 is a great card. I'm running two myself, in eyefinity config with a 4th monitor for reading documents when I need it. Best setup evar.

TheMailMan78 said:
BF3 will prove that statement wrong. That extra VRAM makes a difference in DX11.

You, once again misunderstand where I'm coming from. I've owned a gtx 470, and I run two 6970's now. I think I know very well the difference between the two.

I wasn't speaking of VRAM differences. Of course the extra RAM will make a difference in future titles that use over 1GB. "Duh".

(Typical mail man knee jerk reaction)

W1zzard · Oct 13, 2011

qu4k3r said:
Where is the TPU review of AMD FX Cpu?

according to amd they were supposed to have sent a cpu yesterday, no tracking number for the package yet. dont expect a tpu review soon

cadaveca · Oct 13, 2011

Dent1 said:
How can we be sure ES were used in reviews. I read through most of the literature from Tomhshardware, Techspot, Hardware Heaven etc and none of the journalists mention only having Engineering samples available.

Granted some of the literal was extremely long, maybe my eyes missed the parts where they mentioned having ES only.

Look at CPU-Z screenshots for "8130P" as the CPU name. Pretty easy.

If there is no CPU-Z, look for them using the provided watercooler, and for them using the ASUS Crosshair V motherboard. NO Crosshair 5 is an immediate disqualification, in my books, unless they somehow confirm that they have a retail chip.

System Name	---
Processor	FX 8350 @ 4.00 Ghz with 1.28v
Motherboard	Gigabyte 990FX-UD3 v4.0, Hacked Bios F4.x
Cooling	Silenx 4 pipe Tower cooler + 2 x Cougar 120mm fan, 3 x 120mm, 1 x 200 mm Red LED fan
Memory	Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 16GB + Patriot Memory DDR3 1866 16GB
Video Card(s)	Asus R9 290 OC @ GPU - 1050, MEM - 1300
Storage	Inland 256GB PCIe NVMe SSD for OS, WDC Black - 2TB + 1TB Storage, Inland 480GB SSD - Games
Display(s)	3 x 1080P LCDs - Acer 25" + Acer 23" + HP 23"
Case	AeroCool XPredator X3
Audio Device(s)	Built-in Realtek
Power Supply	Corsair HX1000 Modular
Software	Windows 10 Pro 64 bit

System Name	My Computer
Processor	Core 2 Q9550 4Ghz 1.23volts
Motherboard	Gigabyte
Cooling	Corsair
Memory	OCZ
Video Card(s)	Galaxy
Storage	Western Digital
Display(s)	Acer
Case	Lian li
Audio Device(s)	Asus
Power Supply	Corsiar
Software	Microsoft
Benchmark Scores	25,000 3dmark06 at 4.35Ghz processor, 835core card!

System Name	WorkInProgress
Processor	AMD 7800X3D
Motherboard	MSI X670E GAMING PLUS
Cooling	Thermalright AM5 Contact Frame + Phantom Spirit 120SE
Memory	2x32GB G.Skill Trident Z5 NEO DDR5 6000 CL32
Video Card(s)	Gainward RTX 4070Ti Phantom Reunion (The54thvoid Edition)
Storage	WD SN770 1TB (Boot)\|1x WD SN850X 8TB (Gaming)\| 2x2TB WD SN770\| 2x2TB+2x4TB Crucial BX500
Display(s)	LG GP850-B
Case	Corsair 760T (White) {1xCorsair ML120 Pro\|5xML140 Pro}
Audio Device(s)	Yamaha RX-V573\|Speakers: JBL Control One\|Auna 300-CN\|Wharfedale Diamond SW150
Power Supply	Seasonic Focus GX-850 80+ GOLD
Mouse	Logitech G502 X
Keyboard	Cherry G80-3000N (TKL)
Software	Windows 11 Home
Benchmark Scores	ლ(ಠ益ಠ)ლ

System Name	RBMK-1000
Processor	AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard	Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling	DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory	2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s)	Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage	Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s)	BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case	Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s)	ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply	Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse	ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard	Gamdias Hermes E2
Software	Windows 11 Pro

System Name	White Boy
Processor	Core i7 3770k @4.6 Ghz
Motherboard	ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
Cooling	CORSAIR H100
Memory	CORSAIR Vengeance 16GB @ 2177
Video Card(s)	EVGA GTX 680 CLASSIEFIED @ 1250 Core
Storage	2 Samsung 830 256 GB (Raid 0) 1 Hitachi 4 TB
Display(s)	1 Dell 30U11 30"
Case	BIT FENIX Prodigy
Audio Device(s)	none
Power Supply	SeaSonic X750 Gold 750W Modular
Software	Windows Pro 7 64 bit \|\| Ubuntu 64 Bit
Benchmark Scores	2017 Unigine Heaven :: P37239 3D Mark Vantage

System Name	TheMailbox 5.0 / The Mailbox 4.5
Processor	RYZEN 1700X / Intel i7 2600k @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard	Fatal1ty X370 Gaming K4 / Gigabyte Z77X-UP5 TH Intel LGA 1155
Cooling	MasterLiquid PRO 280 / Scythe Katana 4
Memory	ADATA RGB 16GB DDR4 2666 16-16-16-39 / G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB DDR3 1866: 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s)	MSI 1080 "Duke" with 8Gb of RAM. Boost Clock 1847 MHz / ASUS 780ti
Storage	256Gb M4 SSD / 128Gb Agelity 4 SSD , 500Gb WD (7200)
Display(s)	LG 29" Class 21:9 UltraWide® IPS LED Monitor 2560 x 1080 / Dell 27"
Case	Cooler Master MASTERBOX 5t / Cooler Master 922 HAF
Audio Device(s)	Realtek ALC1220 Audio Codec / SupremeFX X-Fi with Bose Companion 2 speakers.
Power Supply	Seasonic FOCUS Plus Series SSR-750PX 750W Platinum / SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold
Mouse	SteelSeries Sensei (RAW) / Logitech G5
Keyboard	Razer BlackWidow / Logitech (Unknown)
Software	Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
Benchmark Scores	Benching is for bitches.

System Name	JIM LAHEY
Processor	CORE I9 9900K
Motherboard	ASROCK Z390 TAICHI
Cooling	COUGAR HELOR 360 AIO
Memory	32GB TRIDENT Z RGB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s)	EVGA 3080Ti FTW3 ULTRA
Storage	SAMSUNG EVO 1TB
Display(s)	ASUS ROG STRIX 4K UG27UQR
Case	THERMALTAKE VIEW 37
Audio Device(s)	STEELSERIES ARCTIS 7 WIRELESS
Power Supply	EVGA SUPERNOVA G+ 1000
Mouse	STEELSERIES RIVAL 600
Keyboard	STEELSERIES APEX 7 TKL
Software	WINDOWS 10 ENTERPRISE
Benchmark Scores	WUT

System Name	CDdude's Rig!
Processor	AMD Athlon II X4 620
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3
Cooling	Corsair H70
Memory	8GB Corsair Vengence @1600mhz
Video Card(s)	XFX HD 6970 2GB
Storage	OCZ Agility 3 60GB SSD/WD Velociraptor 300GB
Display(s)	ASUS VH232H 23" 1920x1080
Case	Cooler Master CM690 (w/ side window)
Audio Device(s)	Onboard (It sounds fine)
Power Supply	Corsair 850TX
Software	Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit SP1

System Name	Tropicaliente \| A515-43-R19L
Processor	FX-6300 \| R3 3200U
Motherboard	ASRock 970 Extreme 4 \| Grumpy_PK
Cooling	EVGA CLC120 \| Stock
Memory	16GB DDR3-1600 \| 16GB DDR4-2666
Video Card(s)	PowerColor RX-570 4GB Red Dragon \| Vega 3
Storage	256GB SSD (OS) + (512GB+256GB) SSD (Games) + 2TB HDD \| 128GB NVME + 512GB SSD
Display(s)	Asus VN247H-P \| 15.6" FHD
Case	Antec ONE
Audio Device(s)	on board + Logitech Z623 \| on board
Power Supply	MSI MAG A600DN \| Powerbrick ac/dc
Mouse	MS Wired Desktop 600
Keyboard	MS Wired Desktop 600
Software	Win 11 x64 Pro \| Win 10 x64 Home

System Name	My baby
Processor	Athlon II X4 620 @ 3.5GHz, 1.45v, NB @ 2700Mhz, HT @ 2700Mhz - 24hr prime95 stable
Motherboard	Asus M4A785TD-V EVO
Cooling	Sonic Tower Rev 2 with 120mm Akasa attached, Akasa @ Front, Xilence Red Wing 120mm @ Rear
Memory	8 GB G.Skills 1600Mhz
Video Card(s)	ATI ASUS Crossfire 5850
Storage	Crucial MX100 SATA 2.5 SSD
Display(s)	Lenovo ThinkVision 27" (LEN P27h-10)
Case	Antec VSK 2000 Black Tower Case
Audio Device(s)	Onkyo TX-SR309 Receiver, 2x Kef Cresta 1, 1x Kef Center 20c
Power Supply	OCZ StealthXstream II 600w, 4x12v/18A, 80% efficiency.
Software	Windows 10 Professional 64-bit

System Name	Workstation1 \| Asus G55VW-DS71
Processor	i7 970 3.8GHz \| i7 3610QM
Motherboard	RIII Formula
Cooling	EK 360 Supreme HF \| Asus G55VW
Memory	24GB Dominator \| 12GB DDR3
Video Card(s)	2x Diamond HD 6970 \| GTX 660M
Storage	2x Vertex4 256GB \| 256GB Vertex4 & 750GB HDD
Display(s)	3x Crossover 27" LED S-IPS + 30" DELL IPS
Case	Corsair Obsidian 800D
Audio Device(s)	X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro + Gigaworks G550W
Power Supply	HX1000 + NZXT Black Sleeved Extensions
Software	Win7Ult64Bit
Benchmark Scores	ballz

Processor	Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory	48 GB
Video Card(s)	RTX 4080
Storage	2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s)	30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software	Windows 10 64-bit

Review Consensus: AMD FX Processor 8150 Underwhelming

New Member

~Technological Technocrat~

Editor & Senior Moderator

My name is Dave

Big Member

New Member

Big Member

My name is Dave

Big Member

Crazy 4 TPU!!!

Big Member

New Member

Big Member

My name is Dave

Crazy 4 TPU!!!

New Member

Administrator

My name is Dave