• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Price Hurting Intel and AMD in Competition Against ARM

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,677 (7.43/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
While Intel and AMD are making efforts to come up with low-power x86 processor platforms to compete with the plethora of ARM processor vendors, manufacturers of the target devices of these low-power x86 processors - tablets, netbooks, and smartphones; note that the architecture simply isn't competitive due to its prices. ARM processors are manufactured by a variety of companies, in a variety of different SoC configurations, and as such the tough competition among these companies ensure ARM processor platforms are comparatively cheaper to low-power x86 ones.

Intel recently debuted its 32 nm "Medfield" Atom processors, with power consumption as low as 11W for the platform. In the second half of 2012, it will launch another line of processors with under 10W power consumption, for high-end smartphones. AMD, on the other hand, will unveil "Hondo", which combines its x86 architecture with Radeon graphics IP, and a power consumption target of less than 5W. In 2013, it plans to launch the "Temash" APU, with power consumption under 2W, and built on the 28 nm process.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
and I suppose Via with their Nano CPU are totally indifferent to this
 
The message is pretty much this: "Two x86 vendors is not enough"
 
In 2013, it plans to launch the "Temash" APU, with power consumption under 2W, and built on the 28 nm process.

I really want to see that from AMD! no way jose under 2W...
 
and I suppose Via with their Nano CPU are totally indifferent to this

Could be because they are not really represented at all at the market. At least not here, it's damned near impossible to find Nano based stuff, especially dualcores.
 
two giants playing in the sand... option 1-some ants will be crushed option2 the giants eyes will be
full of sand and they will say wtf was i thinking
 
Back
Top