• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Second-Gen. ASUS Zenbook Ivy Bridge and Kepler Driven

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,670 (7.43/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
ASUS Zenbook is perhaps the closest the Ultrabook has gone to Apple's MacBook Air in terms of features and aesthetics. Its makers are saving its successor for the Computex spotlight. It is reported that the second-generation Zenbook will be driven by Intel "Ivy Bridge" Core processor, its compatible 7-series platform, and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M discrete graphics. It will feature NVIDIA Optimus technology that marshals graphics loads between the discrete GPU and Intel HD 4000 graphics, to minimize power draw when on light graphics loads.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
I hope they refined the product as the first iteration was a bit raw.

The title reports Kepler wrong bta :toast:
 
I hope it come with friendly pricing too
 
I do not see the sense of GT640M near Intel HD4000. Can they work together, like crosffireX?
 
I do not see the sense of GT640M near Intel HD4000. Can they work together, like crosffireX?

It switches between the GPUs. So for light graphics usage integrated 4000 and for like a game GT640M. It's to save power
 
I do not see the sense of GT640M near Intel HD4000. Can they work together, like crosffireX?

You can call it Nvidia Optimus
 
Well I mean, I have seen tests and Intel HD4000 seems pretty strong IGP. If GT640M not significantly faster than Intel HD4000 than I do not see the sense of it, unless the two GPU can work together.
 
Well I mean, I have seen tests and Intel HD4000 seems pretty strong IGP. If GT640M not significantly faster than Intel HD4000 than I do not see the sense of it, unless the two GPU can work together.

On its desktop iteration it's sizeably slower than GT240 and this one's against GT640M.
 
I would think a 640M ever Kepler based would be good if it got close to a Desktop GT240 DDR5. Seem like a lot of hoops for not a lot bump. Hope the hand-off can be seamless. I'd rather not pay what will probably be handsomely, to play genie pig with this. Then when a good Fusion A series can provide this realm, and with as good maybe better power consumption… why.
 
Back
Top