• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Penryn 3.33GHz Quad-Core Benchmarks Released

malware

New Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2004
Messages
5,422 (0.72/day)
Location
Bulgaria
Processor Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 G0 VID: 1.2125
Motherboard GIGABYTE GA-P35-DS3P rev.2.0
Cooling Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme + Noctua NF-S12 Fan
Memory 4x1 GB PQI DDR2 PC2-6400
Video Card(s) Colorful iGame Radeon HD 4890 1 GB GDDR5
Storage 2x 500 GB Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 32 MB RAID0
Display(s) BenQ G2400W 24-inch WideScreen LCD
Case Cooler Master COSMOS RC-1000 (sold), Cooler Master HAF-932 (delivered)
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi XtremeMusic + Logitech Z-5500 Digital THX
Power Supply Chieftec CFT-1000G-DF 1kW
Software Laptop: Lenovo 3000 N200 C2DT2310/3GB/120GB/GF7300/15.4"/Razer
Intel unveiled the first benchmark numbers of its recently announced Penryn quad-core processor, which runs at 3.33GHz, at the IDF event in Beijing, China. Intel presented the benchmark numbers of a Penryn 45nm quad-core processor running at 3.3GHz with a 1333MHz FSB and 12MB cache versus an Intel Core 2 Extreme processor QX6800 introduced last week at 2.93GHz with 1066FSB and 8MB cache. Another dual-core version of the Penryn family named Wolfdale with 6MB L2 cache was also included in the comparison. Intel said that the three test systems were configured with identical hardware, including Intel D975XBX2 BadAxe 2 motherboard, single GeForce 8800 GTX graphics card, 2GB of DDR2-800 memory with 5-5-5-15 timings, and a 32-bit version of Windows Vista Ultimate. The results are available below:



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Wow... this cpu will be great for gaming... Look at the HL2 difference between Penryn and conroe... amazing..
 
Don't forget that the Kentsfield QX6800 CPU is clocked at 2.93GHz, while the Penryn CPUs work at 3.33GHz...
 
Awesome numbers. Hell, the Penryn Dual Core is right up there and all of these. Great for gaming, that is, if these numbers arent fudged. We all know AMD and Intel tend to fudge them though.

With that said, still looks awesome and I cant wait for them to come out.
 
Don't forget that the Kentsfield QX6800 CPU is clocked at 2.93GHz, while the Penryn CPUs work at 3.33GHz...

i bet if you clock the qx6800 to 3.3 you will have very close results :)
 
numbers dont tell much as cpu speed is different

other than 45nm, wat is different with the penryn that makes it better ?
 
Anandtech's final words

Obviously we'll reserve final judgments on Penryn for our official review of the CPU, but these initial results look very promising. We would expect to see clock for clock Penryn vs. Conroe improvements to be in the 5 - 10% range at minimum depending on the application. Factor in higher clock speeds and you can expect our CPU performance charts to shift up by about 20% by the end of this year.

Intel has shown its cards, now it's time for AMD to respond with those long overdue Barcelona tests...

Even if you do factor in clock differences, there is a clock for clock increase in performance. Something which is most evident in the divx test.

Even the need for a clock for clock comparison is unnecessary sometimes. If a CPU can be clocked higher, why shouldnt it recieve the credit of doing so? Say in the future, barcelona turns out to be better clock for clock however penryn is able to beat it due to higher clock speed, which is the better CPU?
 
Q3, is that septemeber or later and no earlier ?
 
Back
Top