• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AOC Unveils the Q2778VQE 27-inch WQHD Monitor

27 inch is too big for a normal monitor. Most people use their phones, tablets or in the worst case some type of laptops.

If you have so high PPI on smartphones, you need to have equally high quality on tablets, laptops and those used by the true enthusiasts - the desktop machines with monitors or laptops with the same monitors.

What I am saying is that it makes perfect sense to have mainstream 4k 24 inch monitors and slowly growing all others - incl 17 inch.
For the sake of the quality of the viewing device.

Because my smartphone beats in quality all full HD monitors in the world.

Dude, I will take my chances and answer some of your "inquiries", but not sure you will get the point anyways.

1. There is no point a monitor/display to have the same PPI as a mobile phone. You are not using the monitor on the same viewing distance as you do with the phone. Not unless you have really shitty eyesight, or you want to destroy your eye sight.

resolution_chart.jpg

4cd4431b_200ppdengleski.png

2.
On mobile phones, there is no point going over 1080p because your eyes won't be able to discern the single pixels anyways. Specially for phones up to 6" diagonal. If you go more, the only thing that will happen will be a reduce in battery life and crappy performance on 3D apps.

3. Currently no single video card can properly play the latest 3D games even on 1440p resolution with MAX details, not to mention about 4K; Btw, 27" is not too big, there is no such thing as too big, as long as you adjust your viewing distance. I used to have a 42" 1080p TV used as a monitor and it was awesome, because I was keeping it on the wall in front, not on my desk.

Cheers.
 
"Thank you" again for the excuses but you will not sell me them.

My eyesight is strong (not shitty) enough to be annoyed by all those shitty monitors that those manufacturers sell.

Do you understand that I see the grainy, big pixels even at distance of 50 cm.

The only thing that saves them is the stupidity of people and that they had already gotten used to it.

But I am tired!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
"Thank you" again for the excuses but you will not sell me them.

My eyesight is strong (not shitty) enough to be annoyed by all those shitty monitors that those manufacturers sell.

Do you understand that I see the grainy, big pixels even at distance of 50 cm.

The only thing that saves them is the stupidity of people and that they had already gotten used to it.

But I am tired!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

But he's helping your argument. At 50 cm that chart tells you you're absolutely right, including being able to see 8K on a 17 inch monitor. He's also giving a bunch of good reasons why it's not feasible, yet. If you're upset the world hasn't turned out the way you would like ... well no one would argue with that, because it sure hasn't.

My dream monitor is a 27 inch 1440p monitor, simply because scaling (at least not in Windows) is not perfect yet and that would be good enough. Scaling is getting better and better but it's not quite there yet.
 
He's also giving a bunch of good reasons why it's not feasible, yet.

He didn't say why it is "not feasible" yet. He just gave silly excuses which no one would believe. :D
 
At 50 cm that chart tells you you're absolutely right, including being able to see 8K on a 17 inch monitor.

Actually 50 Cm is a little less than 20 Inchs ;) :D
 
Back
Top