• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Radeon Graphics Roadmap for 2015 Leaked

Joined
Aug 20, 2007
Messages
20,833 (3.40/day)
System Name Pioneer
Processor Ryzen R9 7950X
Motherboard GIGABYTE Aorus Elite X670 AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 + A whole lotta Sunon and Corsair Maglev blower fans...
Memory 64GB (4x 16GB) G.Skill Flare X5 @ DDR5-6000 CL30
Video Card(s) XFX RX 7900 XTX Speedster Merc 310
Storage 2x Crucial P5 Plus 2TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSDs
Display(s) 55" LG 55" B9 OLED 4K Display
Case Thermaltake Core X31
Audio Device(s) TOSLINK->Schiit Modi MB->Asgard 2 DAC Amp->AKG Pro K712 Headphones or HDMI->B9 OLED
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti Pro 850W
Mouse Logitech G305 Lightspeed Wireless
Keyboard WASD Code v3 with Cherry Green keyswitches + PBT DS keycaps
Software Gentoo Linux x64 / Windows 11
Yes, that is the greatest board game all time!

But yeah monopoly is not wanted situation, even current duopoly is kind of lame(and I mean especially dgpus).

I know AMD isn't putting up as much of a fight as we'd all like... my point was mainly that hoping "NVIDIA wins!" is a bad thing. We want AMD to put up a fight, for everyone.

So even if you don't plan to buy it, you should hope the Fury is awesome.
 

64K

Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
6,217 (1.67/day)
Processor i7 7700k
Motherboard MSI Z270 SLI Plus
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 2 x 8 GB Corsair Vengeance
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2070 Super
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250 GB and WD Black 4TB
Display(s) Dell 27 inch 1440p 144 Hz
Case Corsair Obsidian 750D Airflow Edition
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply EVGA SuperNova 850 W Gold
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech G105
Software Windows 10
My disappointment isn't for AMD or Nvidia. I'm disappointed that we've been stuck on the 28nm process for over 3 years and there's only so much that either company can do to increase performance by a lot. Next year will be the leap in performance with 16nm Pascal and 14nm Arctic Islands. Performance per watt should go up a good bit.

As far a VRAM usage there are games that use over 4 GB and there will likely be more in this console life cycle.



"Eight GB of memory would have been more than enough, and, in my opinion, future-proof. Even today, the 6 GB of the two-year-old Titan are too much as 4 GB is enough for all titles to date. Both the Xbox One and PS4 have 8 GB of VRAM of which 5 GB and 4.5 GB are, respectively, available to games, so I seriously doubt developers will exceed that amount any time soon."

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_Titan_X/33.html
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2012
Messages
3,013 (0.67/day)
Location
Zagreb, Croatia
System Name Windows 10 64-bit Core i7 6700
Processor Intel Core i7 6700
Motherboard Asus Z170M-PLUS
Cooling Corsair AIO
Memory 2 x 8 GB Kingston DDR4 2666
Video Card(s) Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Storage Western Digital Caviar Blue 1 TB, Seagate Baracuda 1 TB
Display(s) Dell P2414H
Case Corsair Carbide Air 540
Audio Device(s) Realtek HD Audio
Power Supply Corsair TX v2 650W
Mouse Steelseries Sensei
Keyboard CM Storm Quickfire Pro, Cherry MX Reds
Software MS Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
With HD4000 I "only" had HD4850, but I don't remember HD4950 even existing back then...
Only with series 6000 they introduced x9xx notation for a single GPU cards. Before that flagships were HD3870, HD4870 and HD5870.
I used to have HD4870, it was a great card for DX10 era. I regret never owning 5000 series back when it was fresh, in retrospective it was really stupid of me going green team just before Evergreen series was out. There I was with a brand new GTX 260 sp 216, reading reviews about 5870 and weeping :laugh:
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (1.92/day)
Yeah, the HD5850 that I had doubled the performance of HD4850 (that I had before). It was a 100% increase in performance. That was a really great release by AMD (or was it still ATi back then, I forgot).
 
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
872 (0.15/day)
Location
Copenhagen, Denmark
System Name Ryzen/Laptop/htpc
Processor R9 3900X/i7 6700HQ/i7 2600
Motherboard AsRock X470 Taichi/Acer/ Gigabyte H77M
Cooling Corsair H115i pro with 2 Noctua NF-A14 chromax/OEM/Noctua NH-L12i
Memory G.Skill Trident Z 32GB @3200/16GB DDR4 2666 HyperX impact/24GB
Video Card(s) TUL Red Dragon Vega 56/Intel HD 530 - GTX 950m/ 970 GTX
Storage 970pro NVMe 512GB,Samsung 860evo 1TB, 3x4TB WD gold/Transcend 830s, 1TB Toshiba/Adata 256GB + 1TB WD
Display(s) Philips FTV 32 inch + Dell 2407WFP-HC/OEM/Sony KDL-42W828B
Case Phanteks Enthoo Luxe/Acer Barebone/Enermax
Audio Device(s) SoundBlasterX AE-5 (Dell A525)(HyperX Cloud Alpha)/mojo/soundblaster xfi gamer
Power Supply Seasonic focus+ 850 platinum (SSR-850PX)/165 Watt power brick/Enermax 650W
Mouse G502 Hero/M705 Marathon/G305 Hero Lightspeed
Keyboard G19/oem/Steelseries Apex 300
Software Win10 pro 64bit
seems fine! i dont get why people are bitching about.. if what you buy does what you wanted it to do.. why are you bitching????
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.60/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
Yeah, the HD5850 that I had doubled the performance of HD4850 (that I had before). It was a 100% increase in performance. That was a really great release by AMD (or was it still ATi back then, I forgot).
HD 2### were the last developed exclusively by ATI. HD 5### were the last to have ATI branding; HD 6### were AMD branded.
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2012
Messages
3,013 (0.67/day)
Location
Zagreb, Croatia
System Name Windows 10 64-bit Core i7 6700
Processor Intel Core i7 6700
Motherboard Asus Z170M-PLUS
Cooling Corsair AIO
Memory 2 x 8 GB Kingston DDR4 2666
Video Card(s) Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Storage Western Digital Caviar Blue 1 TB, Seagate Baracuda 1 TB
Display(s) Dell P2414H
Case Corsair Carbide Air 540
Audio Device(s) Realtek HD Audio
Power Supply Corsair TX v2 650W
Mouse Steelseries Sensei
Keyboard CM Storm Quickfire Pro, Cherry MX Reds
Software MS Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
I consider RADEON 9700 and HD 5870 the greatest achievements from red team, those cards doubled the performance at the same price when they became king of the hill. Also first DX9 and first DX11 chips.
They had similar success with 7970 to a lesser extent because of the pricing. I feel that if they could've produced it (or price it) cheaper, they'd taken back their piece of the market.
I have a good feeling about Fury, they just need to patch up their drivers. I sure hope they have found enough developers, they are currently looking for 290 more workers, 19 of those have something to do with drivers and software development, such as this one https://www.amd.apply2jobs.com/ProfExt/index.cfm?fuseaction=mExternal.showJob&RID=30763&CurrentPage=1
guess things are happening ... wheels are in motion
 
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
633 (0.11/day)
Location
Australia
System Name _Speedforce_ (Successor to Strike-X, 4LI3NBR33D-H, Core-iH7 & Nemesis-H)
Processor Intel Core i9 7980XE (Lapped) @ 5.2Ghz With XSPC Raystorm (Lapped)
Motherboard Asus Rampage VI Extreme (XSPC Watercooled) - Custom Heatsinks (Lapped)
Cooling XSPC Custom Water Cooling + Custom Air Cooling (From Delta 220's TFB1212GHE to Spal 30101504&5)
Memory 8x 8Gb G.Skill Trident Z RGB 4266MHz @ 4667Mhz (2x F4-4266C17Q-32GTZR)
Video Card(s) 3x Asus GTX1080 Ti (Lapped) With Customised EK Waterblock (Lapped) + Custom heatsinks (Lapped)
Storage 1x Samsung 970 EVO 2TB - 2280 (Hyper M.2 x16 Card), 7x Samsung 860 Pro 4Tb
Display(s) 6x Asus ROG Swift PG348Q
Case Aerocool Strike X (Modified)
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound BlasterX AE-5 & Aurvana XFi Headphones
Power Supply 2x Corsair AX1500i With Custom Sheilding, Custom Switching Unit. Braided Cables.
Mouse Razer Copperhead + R.A.T 9
Keyboard Ideazon Zboard + Optimus Maximus. Logitech G13.
Software w10 Pro x64.
Benchmark Scores pppft, gotta see it to believe it. . .
GTA5 wants 6 GiB for 4K. Many games will follow thanks to games turning 64-bit, Direct3D 12, and consoles having 8 GiB of memory. Everything that previously stopped games from using ridiculous amounts of memory are now gone--the sky is the limit and 4 GiB isn't a very high limit.

I am running 3x 28" 4K monitors and my GTA5 hits 11Gb totally maxed out.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
748 (0.19/day)
Location
Oceania
Over last ~20yrs the best card I've owned as far as longevity goes would be the 8800GTX. 9800 Pro would come 2nd except I killed it :D.

I currently have a 7950 VaporX Rev2, bought it 2yrs ago and right now it's about to place 1st equal beside the 8000GTX... :)

I don't like the whole rebranding thing....I know both teams do it but it's dishonest marketing imho...
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (1.92/day)
Well, it's a good core, you have to admit that. I'm running EVERYTHING maxed out at 1080p and I very much prefer to use FSAA. So yeah, still quite a lot of grunt for such an old card. But like I said, I'm a curios creature, I want to experience new hardware even if there is no real need. I'll just crank up something, FSAA if there is nothing else. Or just use VSR...

Only game where I'd need more grunt is Natural Selection 2 though. That game is more demanding than GTA5 in late game when teams make tons of structures...
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
748 (0.19/day)
Location
Oceania
Well, it's a good core, you have to admit that. I'm running EVERYTHING maxed out at 1080p and I very much prefer to use FSAA. So yeah, still quite a lot of grunt for such an old card. But like I said, I'm a curios creature, I want to experience new hardware even if there is no real need. I'll just crank up something, FSAA if there is nothing else. Or just use VSR...

Only game where I'd need more grunt is Natural Selection 2 though. That game is more demanding than GTA5 in late game when teams make tons of structures...
Yep and compared to Cayman the difference is like night & day.
After overclocking my 7950, overall performance was nearly double that of a 6950 it replaced. Usually I wait a couple gens before upgrading, I made an exception....glad I did.


Shame AMD's engineers are let down by a lousy driver team.
 
Joined
Apr 24, 2008
Messages
1,899 (0.32/day)
Processor RyZen R9 3950X
Motherboard ASRock X570 Taichi
Cooling Coolermaster Master Liquid ML240L RGB
Memory 64GB DDR4 3200 (4x16GB)
Video Card(s) RTX 3050
Storage Samsung 2TB SSD
Display(s) Asus VE276Q, VE278Q and VK278Q triple 27” 1920x1080
Case Zulman MS800
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Seasonic 650W
VR HMD Oculus Rift, Oculus Quest V1, Oculus Quest 2
Software Windows 11 64bit
These so called rebranded card better have HDMI 2.0,.......
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.60/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
Don't know why they wouldn't. HDMI is not difficult for a PC graphics card to do.
 
Joined
Sep 29, 2013
Messages
97 (0.02/day)
Processor Intel i7 4960x Ivy-Bridge E @ 4.6 Ghz @ 1.42V
Motherboard x79 AsRock Extreme 11.0
Cooling EK Supremacy Copper Waterblock
Memory 65.5 GBs Corsair Platinum Kit @ 666.7Mhz
Video Card(s) PCIe 3.0 x16 -- Asus GTX Titan Maxwell
Storage Samsung 840 500GBs + OCZ Vertex 4 500GBs 2x 1TB Samsung 850
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster ZXR
Power Supply Corsair 1000W
Mouse Razer Naga
Keyboard Corsair K95
Software Zbrush, 3Dmax, Maya, Softimage, Vue, Sony Vegas Pro, Acid, Soundforge, Adobe Aftereffects, Photoshop
Soooo... R9 390 and 390x will be rebrands/refined versions of the 290 and 290x and the next gen HBM stuff will be Fiji and FijiXT?

Makes sense I guess if refined versions are able to keep up with nvidias options at price for performance levels.

Ahh no. Consider these two points:

R9-290x is being rebranded as the R9-380. R9-390x and Fury are not rebrands because they will have different types of memory setups and more streaming processors then the previous generation. Fury is having 4 GBs HBM and R9-390x is having 8 GB VRam. In a sense, these are the GTX 980ti and GTX Titan-X variant, flagship tiers on the AMD side for this generation. GTX Titan with full GM200 and 12 GBs VRam will be in competition with R9-390x for 4k performance supremacy. GTX 980ti, the dumb-down step-child of the GTX Titan-x, is going up against the Fury XT which will beat both GTX Titan-X and 980 Ti in FPS Performance due to HBM. Both R9-390x and Fury will both run 4096 SP.

or

If you want to look at it from another point of view, NVidia 400 to 500 to 600 to 700 to 900 series could be looked at as rebrands of one another. The only differences is the changes between Fermi to kep to Maxwell being the only small difference besides a change in the framebuffer. If people want to call R9-390x a rebrand/refine version of R9-290x, then what I just stated just now is true too. AMD 4000 series got rebranded into the 5000 series, then the 6000 series, then the 7000 series, then the R9-200 series, etc... The main point being that just little 15% to 50% increases were made in between each generation, both AMD and Nvidia, due to rebranding different generations for less than stellar performance increases. Performance increases being the worst on NVidia's end, but that's heavily subjected by every individual's preferences and views on "performance." Difference of 64 Watts doesn't mean crap to a lot, but it's a big deal to NVidia fanboys. Spending $200 dollars more for the GTX 780 Ti over R9-290x for + 10 FPS was really worth it to some...


I think the term "rebrand" is being misused across the web regarding these GPU's. While they have done actual rebrands (IE HD 7970 becomes R9 280X) that offer no improvements over the previous generation (Minus clock bumps) these new chips are all being refined similar to the Tonga R9 285 which bring improvements and new features across the board instead of just an increase in clocks speeds and ram. The chips will be improved upon in more ways than one if the R9 285 was any indication especially now a days where it sits on the board currently in relation to the other R9 series chips. They already confirmed that the R9 370+ were on the newest version of GCN so it depends on what that all entails but these are not just straight up rebrands.

+ 10


Another thing to consider:
GTX 960 = GTX 780 Ti
GTX 760 = GTX 680

In general:

Hypocrisy amongst other TPU members calling AMD out on their rebrands is pretty high since NVidia was the first to do it. Lets look the other way when NVidia does it, but cry like a Bit*** because AMD started copying them. Wa wa! I remember a quote from our very own Humansmoke who told somebody, explaining the hatred between AMD and NVidia fanboys. With Humansmoke siding with the NVidia fanboys, he made a claim that AMD Fanboys are "divorced from reality." Sadly, this little trick of demonizing the other side with their own faults and defects is pretty pathetic on the Green Camp's part, and the only other group of people low enough to resort to this Aquarius-form of tactics and rhetoric is the Republican Party.... Lawls, shots fired! As for the idiots who want NVidia to be a monopoly, you are basically saying you want AMD to die in a raging fire, and your performance increases each proceeding generation after NVidia becomes a monopoly, to only increase by 1% for a flat rate of $200.00 per generation, and no more Titans or 15% performance improvements. GG NVidia Fanboys.

On a side note, I am not an AMD Fanboy. You may mis-construde that because their is an abundants of ignorant people in the world. I'm actually investing in 2 Titan-X for the purposes of using them for 3D animation and content creation, but I am holding out for 3rd party benches on AMD Fury....
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
5,417 (0.97/day)
System Name Cyberline
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k -> 12600k
Motherboard Asus P8P67 LE Rev 3.0 -> Gigabyte Z690 Auros Elite DDR4
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120 -> Custom Watercoolingloop
Memory Corsair (4x2) 8gb 1600mhz -> Crucial (8x2) 16gb 3600mhz
Video Card(s) AMD RX480 -> RX7800XT
Storage Samsung 750 Evo 250gb SSD + WD 1tb x 2 + WD 2tb -> 2tb MVMe SSD
Display(s) Philips 32inch LPF5605H (television) -> Dell S3220DGF
Case antec 600 -> Thermaltake Tenor HTCP case
Audio Device(s) Focusrite 2i4 (USB)
Power Supply Seasonic 620watt 80+ Platinum
Mouse Elecom EX-G
Keyboard Rapoo V700
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
Yep and compared to Cayman the difference is like night & day.
After overclocking my 7950, overall performance was nearly double that of a 6950 it replaced. Usually I wait a couple gens before upgrading, I made an exception....glad I did.


Shame AMD's engineers are let down by a lousy driver team.

My poor 6950 :(
Im already annoyed enough by my friends performance with their 7950 grrr no need for salt in the wound!
 
Top