• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Seagate Hit with Class Action Lawsuit over High HDD Failure Rates

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
46,274 (7.69/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Hard drive major Seagate has been hit with a class action lawsuit, accusing it of abnormally high failure rates for its 1.5 TB and 3 TB internal and external/portable hard drives. It also accuses the company of false claims over "reliability" and "dependability" in its marketing.

The lawsuit cites data aggregated by cloud solutions company Backblaze. According to this data, a 3 TB Seagate hard drive is three times as likely to fail, as a Western Digital (WD) 3 TB hard drive. It's also ten times as likely to fail as a Hitachi drive. The data appears to look at percentage failure rate, and not raw failed drive volumes, so market-share and volumes shipped by each company is not relevant. Seagate is yet to respond to the lawsuit.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 

Athlon2K15

HyperVtX™
Joined
Sep 27, 2006
Messages
7,909 (1.24/day)
Location
O-H-I-O
Processor Intel Core i9 11900K
Motherboard MSI Z590 Carbon EK X
Cooling Custom Water
Memory Team DDR4 4000MHz
Video Card(s) ASUS TUF RTX 3080 OC
Storage WD WN850 1TB
Display(s) 43" LG NanoCell 4K 120Hz
Power Supply Asus Thor 1200w
Mouse Asus Strix Evolve
Keyboard Asus Strix Claymore
great source for their data, lol. I wouldnt trust backblaze with a KB of my data.
 
Joined
Mar 7, 2011
Messages
3,882 (0.81/day)
Seriously Seagate needs to wake up about their overall quality of harddrives. Also both WD and Seagate should lower the prices of drives as it seems like SSDs are getting more and more affordable enough to replace the HDDs.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,944 (0.65/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
Processor OCed 5800X3D
Motherboard Asucks C6H
Cooling Air
Memory 32GB
Video Card(s) OCed 6800XT
Storage NVMees
Display(s) 32" Dull curved 1440
Case Freebie glass idk
Audio Device(s) Sennheiser
Power Supply Don't even remember
Big surprise. Seagate has been junk for more years than I can remember.
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2008
Messages
1,180 (0.21/day)
Location
Australia
Processor Intel i7 4790K
Motherboard Asus Z97 Deluxe
Cooling Thermalright Ultra Extreme 120
Memory Corsair Dominator 1866Mhz 4X4GB
Video Card(s) Asus R290X
Storage Samsung 850 Pro SSD 256GB/Samsung 840 Evo SSD 1TB
Display(s) Samsung S23A950D
Case Corsair 850D
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek
Power Supply Corsair AX850
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech G710+
Software Windows 10 x64
interesting about Hitachi.....How does Samsung fare? I only have one spinning drive left and its not in my main PC.
 
Joined
Apr 18, 2015
Messages
234 (0.07/day)
Indeed reliability went down pretty hard on the hard drive side, however they also got cheaper.

I think to get the old times reliability you need to look at disks with 5 years warranty, WD RE like, which are significantly more expensive than mainstream disks.
 
Joined
Mar 30, 2011
Messages
957 (0.20/day)
System Name Better than before
Processor 10400
Motherboard B460 Pro4
Cooling Id-Cooling 224
Memory 16 GB
Video Card(s) 1650 Super
Storage Swordfish 500 GB
Display(s) AOC G2
Case Coolermaster Ammo 533
Audio Device(s) Micca MB42X
Power Supply Pure Power 11
Mouse G403
Keyboard Sidewinder x4
Software Windows 10 (ugh)
interesting about Hitachi.....How does Samsung fare? I only have one spinning drive left and its not in my main PC.

Yea, me too. I have a Samsung Spinpoint that runs a lot and it's about 4 years old.
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
563 (0.13/day)
Processor i5 4670K - @ 4.8GHZ core
Motherboard MSI Z87 G43
Cooling Thermalright Ultra-120 *(Modded to fit on this motherboard)
Memory 16GB 2400MHZ
Video Card(s) HD7970 GHZ edition Sapphire
Storage Samsung 120GB 850 EVO & 4X 2TB HDD (Seagate)
Display(s) 42" Panasonice LED TV @120Hz
Case Corsair 200R
Audio Device(s) Xfi Xtreme Music with Hyper X Core
Power Supply Cooler Master 700 Watts
I need to get myself some Hitachissss... :cool:
 
Joined
May 19, 2009
Messages
1,817 (0.33/day)
Location
Latvia
System Name Personal \\ Work - HP EliteBook 840 G6
Processor 7700X \\ i7-8565U
Motherboard Asrock X670E PG Lightning
Cooling Noctua DH-15
Memory G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB Black 32GB 6000MHz CL36 \\ 16GB DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) ASUS RoG Strix 1070 Ti \\ Intel UHD Graphics 620
Storage 2x KC3000 2TB, Samsung 970 EVO 512GB \\ OEM 256GB NVMe SSD
Display(s) BenQ XL2411Z \\ FullHD + 2x HP Z24i external screens via docking station
Case Fractal Design Define Arc Midi R2 with window
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150 with Logitech Z533
Power Supply Corsair AX860i
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Corsair K55 RGB PRO
Software Windows 11 \\ Windows 10
Purely from my experience with HP business line of desktops, which are using Seagate drives by default.
If something dies within those computers, it will be the hard drive in most cases. Note - it is not that often it happens, but it has kinda made me think that these drives may fail sooner that I would like to.
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2012
Messages
6,401 (1.44/day)
Location
Florida
System Name natr0n-PC
Processor Ryzen 5950x/5600x
Motherboard B450 AORUS M
Cooling EK AIO - 6 fan action
Memory Patriot - Viper Steel DDR4 (B-Die)(4x8GB)
Video Card(s) EVGA 3070ti FTW
Storage Various
Display(s) PIXIO IPS 240Hz 1080P
Case Thermaltake Level 20 VT
Audio Device(s) LOXJIE D10 + Kinter Amp + 6 Bookshelf Speakers Sony+JVC+Sony
Power Supply Super Flower Leadex III ARGB 80+ Gold 650W
Software XP/7/8.1/10
Benchmark Scores http://valid.x86.fr/79kuh6
This is hilarious they've been selling shit for the longest time.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,944 (0.65/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
Processor OCed 5800X3D
Motherboard Asucks C6H
Cooling Air
Memory 32GB
Video Card(s) OCed 6800XT
Storage NVMees
Display(s) 32" Dull curved 1440
Case Freebie glass idk
Audio Device(s) Sennheiser
Power Supply Don't even remember
interesting about Hitachi.....How does Samsung fare? I only have one spinning drive left and its not in my main PC.

Western Digital has owned Hitachi for almost as long as Crapgate has owned Samsung.

Yea, me too. I have a Samsung Spinpoint that runs a lot and it's about 4 years old.
Seagate bought Samsung's HDD division in 2011. That's why they went to shit, too. You could still get rebadged Samsung hardware for a while, but Crapgate didn't continue production.

Samsung had very solid and cheap drives (remember those sweet 1 and 2TB models before prices were artificially jacked up b/c of the flood). I bet Sammy regretted the sale b/c drives doubled in price overnight LOL.

I have a real Samsung 1TB and it's a beast (5 yrs old).
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
1,187 (0.30/day)
Processor 11700
Motherboard TUF z590
Memory G.Skill 32gb 3600mhz
Video Card(s) ROG Vega 56
Case Deepcool
Power Supply RM 850
I'm so used to using SSDs because hdds remind me of 1990s that nice grinding sound and thous low speeds and nice failure rates :)
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,944 (0.65/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
Processor OCed 5800X3D
Motherboard Asucks C6H
Cooling Air
Memory 32GB
Video Card(s) OCed 6800XT
Storage NVMees
Display(s) 32" Dull curved 1440
Case Freebie glass idk
Audio Device(s) Sennheiser
Power Supply Don't even remember
interesting about Hitachi.....How does Samsung fare? I only have one spinning drive left and its not in my main PC.

But SSDs won't get you a 21TB NAS unless you have some decent spending cash. I speak from experience LOL
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
1,187 (0.30/day)
Processor 11700
Motherboard TUF z590
Memory G.Skill 32gb 3600mhz
Video Card(s) ROG Vega 56
Case Deepcool
Power Supply RM 850
But SSDs won't get you a 21TB NAS unless you have some decent spending cash. I speak from experience LOL

cry.gif
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,944 (0.65/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
Processor OCed 5800X3D
Motherboard Asucks C6H
Cooling Air
Memory 32GB
Video Card(s) OCed 6800XT
Storage NVMees
Display(s) 32" Dull curved 1440
Case Freebie glass idk
Audio Device(s) Sennheiser
Power Supply Don't even remember
Mine is already almost filled...there was no waiting. I'm going to need to build another one or upgrade to 6TB drives.
 
Joined
Nov 5, 2014
Messages
714 (0.21/day)
The lawsuit cites data aggregated by cloud solutions company Backblaze.

Erm, so the lawsuit has no actual evidence/data to support it then? lol.

Backblaze are a bargain basement data storage company, they build file servers out of consumer HDDs and pack them into densely populated homemade enclosures that starve them of air and run ridiculously hot, their data on failure rates is no more relevant to the consumer than McLarens failure rate of Honda engines in Formula one.

All their data shows is that Seagate's consumer drives are more likely to die if subjected to stupid levels of torture which are completely incomparable to consumer usage.
 
Joined
Mar 30, 2011
Messages
957 (0.20/day)
System Name Better than before
Processor 10400
Motherboard B460 Pro4
Cooling Id-Cooling 224
Memory 16 GB
Video Card(s) 1650 Super
Storage Swordfish 500 GB
Display(s) AOC G2
Case Coolermaster Ammo 533
Audio Device(s) Micca MB42X
Power Supply Pure Power 11
Mouse G403
Keyboard Sidewinder x4
Software Windows 10 (ugh)
Western Digital has owned Hitachi for almost as long as Crapgate has owned Samsung.


Seagate bought Samsung's HDD division in 2011. That's why they went to shit, too. You could still get rebadged Samsung hardware for a while, but Crapgate didn't continue production.

Samsung had very solid and cheap drives (remember those sweet 1 and 2TB models before prices were artificially jacked up b/c of the flood). I bet Sammy regretted the sale b/c drives doubled in price overnight LOL.

I have a real Samsung 1TB and it's a beast (5 yrs old).

Thanks for the info. I have the 500gb model shown here: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/2tb-hdd-7200,2430-2.html

I assume this is the real deal and not a SG rebrand. I notice they state that it uses very little power and runs cool. Open Hardware Monitor agrees with this. It's at 31c with a crappy case with no intake fan.

I'm actually gonna get a 2tb drive in 2 days because I'm tired of deleting stuff from this 500gb drive. I'm going with Hitachi if able, or maybe Toshiba since I can't really find anything on them. I figure they can't be worse than WD.

Erm, so the lawsuit has no actual evidence/data to support it then? lol.

Backblaze are a bargain basement data storage company, they build file servers out of consumer HDDs and pack them into densely populated homemade enclosures that starve them of air and run ridiculously hot, their data on failure rates is no more relevant to the consumer than McLarens failure rate of Honda engines in Formula one.

All their data shows is that Seagate's consumer drives are more likely to die if subjected to stupid levels of torture which are completely incomparable to consumer usage.

There's still thousands of drives tested in the same conditions and the numbers don't lie. (at least, not to my knowledge, unless they are trying to make SG look bad)
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 8, 2012
Messages
1,445 (0.34/day)
Location
Israel
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard B550 Aorus PRO V2
Cooling Corsair H115i RGB Platinum
Memory Gskill Trident Z Neo 3600 2x16GB
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 3070 Trio X
Storage WD Blue SN550 1TB NVME/Supertalent Teranova 2x1TB
Display(s) Acer XV340CK
Case Corsair 4000D Airflow
Power Supply Corsair HX850i
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Logitech G513 Tactile
Software Windows 10 Pro
I actually found WD to be most reliable, followed by Hitachi and with Seagate being the absolutely worst.
 
Joined
Nov 5, 2014
Messages
714 (0.21/day)
There's still thousands of drives tested in the same conditions and the numbers don't lie. (at least, not to my knowledge, unless they are trying to make SG look bad)

It's not really that simple, the numbers don't lie but the context does. To use a hypothetical example, imagine two watches, one can survive being submerged in water to 50 feet, the other can survive being submerged in water to 50,000 feet, that means if they are used by divers then the will be a big disparity in the failure rate, however if they are used normally by the general public then nobody will see a real difference.

That's effectively the situation here, all the drives are consumer level drives yet they are being subjected to a ridiculous amount of abuse, far beyond what any enterprise drive would normally be subjected to. The extra failure rate of the Seagate drives is irrelevant because it's not a situation any of the drives will ever encounter, it's an artificial situation created by Backblazes greed.
 
Joined
Mar 30, 2011
Messages
957 (0.20/day)
System Name Better than before
Processor 10400
Motherboard B460 Pro4
Cooling Id-Cooling 224
Memory 16 GB
Video Card(s) 1650 Super
Storage Swordfish 500 GB
Display(s) AOC G2
Case Coolermaster Ammo 533
Audio Device(s) Micca MB42X
Power Supply Pure Power 11
Mouse G403
Keyboard Sidewinder x4
Software Windows 10 (ugh)
It's not really that simple, the numbers don't lie but the context does. To use a hypothetical example, imagine two watches, one can survive being submerged in water to 50 feet, the other can survive being submerged in water to 50,000 feet, that means if they are used by divers then the will be a big disparity in the failure rate, however if they are used normally by the general public then nobody will see a real difference.

That's effectively the situation here, all the drives are consumer level drives yet they are being subjected to a ridiculous amount of abuse, far beyond what any enterprise drive would normally be subjected to. The extra failure rate of the Seagate drives is irrelevant because it's not a situation any of the drives will ever encounter, it's an artificial situation created by Backblazes greed.

There's some relevance to your point so I will not pursue this argument any further. I do however think that given the numbers, it would be foolish for anyone to buy a SG drive if they can get another brand at the same $/GB.
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2014
Messages
483 (0.13/day)
Location
Cyprus
Processor 13700KF (5.7GHZ @ 1.38v)
Motherboard Z690 UNIFY-X
Cooling NOCTUA U12A
Memory 2x16 G.SKILL M-DIE (7200-34-44-44-28)
Video Card(s) XFX MERC 7900XT
Storage 1TB KINGSTON KC3000
Display(s) FI32Q
Case LIAN LI O11 DYNAMIC EVO
Audio Device(s) HD599
Power Supply RMX1000
Mouse PULSAR XLITE V2 MINI (RETRO)
Keyboard KEYCHRON V3 (DUROCK T1 + MT3 GODSPEED R2)
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores Superposition 4k optimized - 20652
Told you.. i would never buy a seagate hdd and WD unless it was WD-black-WD red-pro, which HGST Deskstar Nas is way cheaper and maybe more reliable.
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2015
Messages
451 (0.13/day)
System Name Marmo / Kanon
Processor Intel Core i7 9700K / AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Pro WiFi / X570S Aorus Pro AX
Cooling Noctua NH-U12S x 2
Memory Corsair Vengeance 32GB 2666-C16 / 32GB 3200-C16
Video Card(s) KFA2 RTX3070 Ti / Asus TUF RX 6800XT OC
Storage Samsung 970 EVO+ 1TB, 860 EVO 1TB / Samsung 970 Pro 1TB, 970 EVO+ 1TB
Display(s) Dell AW2521HFA / U2715H
Case Fractal Design Focus G / Pop Air RGB
Audio Device(s) Onboard / Creative SB ZxR
Power Supply SeaSonic Focus GX 650W / PX 750W
Mouse Logitech MX310 / G1
Keyboard Logitech G413 / G513
Software Win 11 Ent
With this kind of failure rate, no wonder why Seagate offer only 1-year warranty with their 7200.12 drives.

WD RE is what I would go for with a server build. However they are expensive and with SSD prices dropping, I think my choice will start to change soon.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
6,457 (1.41/day)
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-13700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory 32GB(2x16) DDR5@6600MHz G-Skill Trident Z5
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo
Storage 2TB SK Platinum P41 SSD + 4TB SanDisk Ultra SSD + 500GB Samsung 840 EVO SSD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Logitech Hero G502 SE
Software Windows 11 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
interesting about Hitachi.....How does Samsung fare? I only have one spinning drive left and its not in my main PC.
I have both Hitachi and Samsung for almost 10 years now, and except for some noise, they are good as new. Seagate on the other hand are THE WORST drives ever. Maybe just OCZ is worst than them on the old SSDs... Ditched this shitty company long time ago.
 
Last edited:

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,472 (4.25/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Hard drive major Seagate has been hit with a class action lawsuit, accusing it of abnormally high failure rates for its 1.5 TB and 3 TB internal and external/portable hard drives. It also accuses the company of false claims over "reliability" and "dependability" in its marketing.

The lawsuit cites data aggregated by cloud solutions company Backblaze. According to this data, a 3 TB Seagate hard drive is three times as likely to fail, as a Western Digital (WD) 3 TB hard drive. It's also ten times as likely to fail as a Hitachi drive. The data appears to look at percentage failure rate, and not raw failed drive volumes, so market-share and volumes shipped by each company is not relevant. Seagate is yet to respond to the lawsuit.



Source: OC3D


That entire study was total bullshit. The company uses desktop drives in servers in RAID. And their definition of failure was that the RAID controller kicked the drive out of the array and labeled it as failed. Well, that is what happens when you use desktop drives with server RAID controllers. The controllers are picky, and just don't like some drives. The 1.5TB drives had high failure rates because most of the 1.5TB sector were LP drives, which really don't get along with picky RAID controllers.

Also, why doesn't anyone every pick up on the fact that, according to BlackBlaze, one of the WD models had a 100% failure rate?

A better source of failure rates is this. They actually track consumer return rates. And the reality is they are pretty close together.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 16, 2009
Messages
272 (0.05/day)
Processor Intel Core i7 2500K @ 5GHz 1.4v
Motherboard Asrock Z77E-ITX
Cooling Corsair H60 with 2 x 120mm push/pull exhaust, 140mm intake
Memory 8GB Samsung 30nm DDR3 1600 @ 2133 9-10-10-20-1t 1.45v
Video Card(s) Asus Geforce 480 GTX w/low idle voltage BIOS
Storage 128GB Plextor M3P SSD, 3 x 2TB Hitachi 5400rpm in RAID0
Display(s) 2x eMachines 22" 1080p LCDs
Case Lian Li Q08A Mini-ITX
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair AX750 80Plus Gold
Software Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Erm, so the lawsuit has no actual evidence/data to support it then? lol.

All their data shows is that Seagate's consumer drives are more likely to die if subjected to stupid levels of torture which are completely incomparable to consumer usage.


They've been compiling these results for years. The trend is consistent. I've given Seagate multiple chances and they have failed me every time. I had six 1.5TB 7200.11 drives that all failed due to the notorious mechanical defects in that line. Then I foolishly bought two 4TB consumer grade fileservers a few years ago. I have only actually used one of them for storage and it is failing, the same way that so many others have had it fail. This was a drive that sat idle, heads parked, a majority of the time. At this point, I'm not even sure I want to use the second one.
 
Top