- Joined
- May 19, 2009
- Messages
- 1,825 (0.33/day)
- Location
- Latvia
| System Name | Personal \\ Work - HP EliteBook 840 G6 |
|---|---|
| Processor | 7700X \\ i7-8565U |
| Motherboard | Asrock X670E PG Lightning |
| Cooling | Noctua DH-15 |
| Memory | G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB Black 32GB 6000MHz CL36 \\ 16GB DDR4-2400 |
| Video Card(s) | ASUS RoG Strix 1070 Ti \\ Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
| Storage | 2x KC3000 2TB, Samsung 970 EVO 512GB \\ OEM 256GB NVMe SSD |
| Display(s) | BenQ XL2411Z \\ FullHD + 2x HP Z24i external screens via docking station |
| Case | Fractal Design Define Arc Midi R2 with window |
| Audio Device(s) | Realtek ALC1150 with Logitech Z533 |
| Power Supply | Corsair AX860i |
| Mouse | Logitech G502 |
| Keyboard | Corsair K55 RGB PRO |
| Software | Windows 11 \\ Windows 10 |
Tanks are far, far from becoming irrelevant. Missiles have advanced, true, but so has protection. Abrams has frontal armour equivalent of, what, close to one meter of steel? Merkava IV boasts the most advanced antimissile protection ever deployed (emphasis on the word deployed, as in actual use, not on paper and internet boards). Armata could, in theory, be considered the most safe tank for the crew due to unmanned turret.
Chinese, Russians, others are still developing new models, and so does the West (though the deployment of a truly new tank is quit far due to multitude of reasons).
You can argue that in urban territories it is of less use, but so is everything else on wheels.
And APCs and IFVs doesnt have the same intimidating factor as tanks.
Chinese, Russians, others are still developing new models, and so does the West (though the deployment of a truly new tank is quit far due to multitude of reasons).
You can argue that in urban territories it is of less use, but so is everything else on wheels.
And APCs and IFVs doesnt have the same intimidating factor as tanks.