• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

LG Announces the UltraFine 5K and UltraFine 4K Monitors

Joined
Oct 29, 2016
Messages
79 (0.03/day)
Yeah, people with more money than brains will usually buy anything, if you can make it shiny enough.
But here's the thing: when the first thing thing you think about when looking at a monitor is DPI scaling, it means you don't actually want the monitor running at its native resolution. You may find the odd usecase where it may make sense, but overall it just means there are too many pixels per inch.

With PROPER DPI scaling, you can get super sharp (retina-speak) text and lines on display, because you can make use of excellent high DPI fonts and sub-pixel rendering to create text and lines that appear to feature no cusps unlike lower resolution displays. All this is done at NATIVE resolution of the display, the effective displayed content is less than suggested by the resolution of the display, but you gain enormous sharpness (such that at the reading distance your eyes are unable to discern pixels or effects of spatial quantization). This makes reading text (especially smaller fonts because they are subjected to more relative quantization) and vectorized images/art a lot more enjoyable and easier. I believe this is what a lot of people who have never experienced proper DPI-scaling have trouble visualizing. The best analogy is to think that you have enough GPU power to always use the highest setting in anti-aliasing on a 4k display, such that all lines, text and borders of any game are razor sharp and you are unable to see "jaggies".

I have only had the chance to use Windows 10 + 4K screen once earlier this year and I found that many applications (even those that came bundled with the laptop) did not scale properly. This is in stark contrast with OS X, when all bundled applications scale properly and just about all applications since late 2012 (when the first "Retina" Macbooks came out) have scaled properly with razor-sharp text and lines. Even earlier applications are handled by OS X properly (if it isn't high-DPI aware, the OS apparently renders it as if it was viewed on regular-DPI screen), you don't get the benefit of the razor sharp text and lines, but it certainly is properly sized on the screen and usable versus the super-tiny fonts of applications in Windows 10.

By the way, I did not appreciate your insult about me having more money than brains. Let's refrain from stereotypes and applying it to members here, who are trying to make a contribution to the thread.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 5, 2014
Messages
714 (0.21/day)
No thanks, I'll stay with 40" @ 1920x1080

Can you actually buy 1080p monitors that big or are you using a TV?

1080p is aids at 27" so I'm scared to think how bad it must be at 40" /shudder.

*EDIT*

Eww, I thought about it and it's the same as using a 19" screen at 800x600 /vomit.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
13,147 (2.94/day)
Location
Concord, NH, USA
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
By the way, I did not appreciate your insult about me having more money than brains. Let's refrain from stereotypes and applying it to members here, who are trying to make a contribution to the thread.
Neither did I. It's not like I buy Apple products either (other than my archaic iPhone 4s from years ago,) but rather that I get provided one by my employer. Anyone ignorant enough to say anyone who buys Apple has more money than brains doesn't understand when it comes to business, that reliability and usability are far more important than raw performance or specs. As a software engineer, I don't have time to screw around with my machine because it's not working right. Simply put, when it comes to "just working," No distro of Linux and Windows in general can hold a candle to OS X in that respect and that's because Apple maintains a closed platform so they can control hardware and quality.

So yeah, at home I have a tower with a nice GPU so I can play games but, when it comes to work, I would take a modern Macbook Pro over just about anything else.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,228 (4.06/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Neither did I. It's not like I buy Apple products either (other than my archaic iPhone 4s from years ago,) but rather that I get provided one by my employer. Anyone ignorant enough to say anyone who buys Apple has more money than brains doesn't understand when it comes to business, that reliability and usability are far more important than raw performance or specs. As a software engineer, I don't have time to screw around with my machine because it's not working right. Simply put, when it comes to "just working," No distro of Linux and Windows in general can hold a candle to OS X in that respect and that's because Apple maintains a closed platform so they can control hardware and quality.

So yeah, at home I have a tower with a nice GPU so I can play games but, when it comes to work, I would take a modern Macbook Pro over just about anything else.
I did not say _anyone_ buying Apple has more money than brains, that's just you generalizing. But there are (a lot) of Apple buyers like these: http://www.cultofmac.com/288725/iwatch-prank-shows-badly-apple-fans-want-believe/
Software developer that somehow manages to work on laptop running Linux here.
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2016
Messages
79 (0.03/day)

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
13,147 (2.94/day)
Location
Concord, NH, USA
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
I did not say _anyone_ buying Apple has more money than brains, that's just you generalizing.
You mean when you say:
Yeah, people with more money than brains will usually buy anything, if you can make it shiny enough.
that you're not generalizing a population? Is it the entire population, no but, your wording implies the majority of it. You can generalize without including everyone...
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,228 (4.06/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
I believe you implied it via - "people with more money than brains will usually buy anything". I didn't generalize anything, you stereotyped.
Well, people with more money than brains will buy shiny stuff, that's not up for debate. What I was trying to debate is how you took that sentence and somehow thought I was applying it to all Apple customers. Which I don't.
And I hope it's clear enough now, because I'm going to stop, I don't want to turn this into a flame war or smth.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
13,147 (2.94/day)
Location
Concord, NH, USA
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
Well, people with more money than brains will buy shiny stuff, that's not up for debate. What I was trying to debate is how you took that sentence and somehow thought I was applying it to all Apple customers. Which I don't.
And I hope it's clear enough now, because I'm going to stop, I don't want to turn this into a flame war or smth.
It's not a very far leap from your statement to say that if someone has money and buys apple that they're stupid because you're basically saying that stupid people with money will buy Apple (or something shiny.)

How about you refrain from calling people stupid and we won't have a problem...
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,228 (4.06/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
It's not a very far leap from your statement to say that if someone has money and buys apple that they're stupid because you're basically saying that stupid people with money will buy Apple (or something shiny.)

How about you refrain from calling people stupid and we won't have a problem...
Ok, I'll bite. Do the people in the video I linked above looked smart to you?
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2016
Messages
79 (0.03/day)
Well, people with more money than brains will buy shiny stuff, that's not up for debate. What I was trying to debate is how you took that sentence and somehow thought I was applying it to all Apple customers. Which I don't.
And I hope it's clear enough now, because I'm going to stop, I don't want to turn this into a flame war or smth.

Okay, fair enough. Let's chalk it up to a misunderstanding.
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2016
Messages
79 (0.03/day)
It's not a very far leap from your statement to say that if someone has money and buys apple that they're stupid because you're basically saying that stupid people with money will buy Apple (or something shiny.)

How about you refrain from calling people stupid and we won't have a problem...

Aquinus, let it go and we'll all discuss more meaningful things.

Mac users are frequently stereotyped and I remember a time, more than a decade ago, when I thought I was above Macs and therefore their users for some reason. You should see the forums at Wccftech, it is full of personal attacks. I'm glad I joined this forum because it seemed to contain higher discussion standards.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
13,147 (2.94/day)
Location
Concord, NH, USA
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
Ok, I'll bite. Do the people in the video I linked above looked smart to you?
Look at your source, buddy, it's freaking Jimmy Kimmel Live. I suspect they're doing it because it's funny because sitcoms that aren't funny are bad. Also, coming from a place called cultofmac.com, I suspect that bias isn't in short supply.
Aquinus, let it go and we'll all discuss more meaningful things.

Mac users are frequently stereotyped and I remember a time, more than a decade ago, when I thought I was above Macs and therefore their users for some reason.
It's hard to when people like bug are busy trying to derail it. Bullshit needs to be called out.
 

64K

Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
6,104 (1.65/day)
Processor i7 7700k
Motherboard MSI Z270 SLI Plus
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 2 x 8 GB Corsair Vengeance
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2070 Super
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250 GB and WD Black 4TB
Display(s) Dell 27 inch 1440p 144 Hz
Case Corsair Obsidian 750D Airflow Edition
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply EVGA SuperNova 850 W Gold
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech G105
Software Windows 10
Well, in all fairness Kimmel doesn't disclose how many people were asked about the watch. They might have asked 100 people just to find a few that gave silly answers.
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2016
Messages
79 (0.03/day)
It's hard to when people like bug are busy trying to derail it. Bullshit needs to be called out.

I agree, but "bug" didn't seem too genuinely intent on insulting us, as he later explained. He has an opinion, but he didn't intend to directly apply it to us. Although the wording was very general in its application.

PS. I'm new to this forum and as long as this doesn't keep on happening, I'll be okay with that!
 
  • Like
Reactions: bug
Joined
Oct 29, 2016
Messages
79 (0.03/day)
Just as well, about 1/3rd of the people in my department uses Macs for scientific research (including me) and this has been a trend from what I can observe at prestigious universities in the states, Canada and western Europe. I know for a fact that a lot of smart people uses Macs, too.
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2016
Messages
79 (0.03/day)
Well, in all fairness Kimmel doesn't disclose how many people were asked about the watch. They might have asked 100 people just to find a few that gave silly answers.

Yeah, it is just a TV show meant to humor, it isn't statistically relevant or significant as a representative sample. It is meant to convey the joke the writers had in mind.
 
Top