• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

PowerColor Announces the Radeon RX 550 RedDragon

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
46,393 (7.67/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
TUL Corporation, a leading and innovative manufacturer of AMD graphic cards since 1997, has released a new PowerColor Red Dragon RX 550 2GB GDDR5 added in the line of RX 500 series. It is based on AMD's latest GCN 4 architecture designed for GloFo 14nm FinFET that delivers premium VR capability, increased level of performance, smooth VR, seamless support for next-gen gaming monitors and CPU-free game streaming or recording.

Furthermore, the model also supports AMD's optimized DirectX 12,Vulkan Gaming, Radeon FreeSync, and Liquid VR. It has the features of AMD's newest technology called Radeon ReLive which supports 4K, 30 & 60FPS, HEVC & H.264 providing you smooth recording on lower power systems, and Radeon Chill which is an intelligent power-saving feature that regulates dynamically frame rate based on your movement's in-game.



PowerColor Red Dragon RX 550 2GB GDDR5 utilizes 2GB of GDDR5 memory with 512 stream processors, ships with 1190MHz core clock speed, and has 1750MHz (7.0Gbps) memory clock speed which is connected via a new high speed 128-bit memory interface.

To support proper cooling systems for the heat dissipation, RX 550 2GB adopts the one ball + one sleeve fan which increases longevity and efficiency. Besides, the performance is higher 2X than R7 250.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
5,717 (0.97/day)
System Name Virtual Reality / Bioinformatics
Processor Undead CPU
Motherboard Undead TUF X99
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory GSkill 128GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 Ultra
Storage Samsung 960 Pro 1TB + 860 EVO 2TB + WD Black 5TB
Display(s) 32'' 4K Dell
Case Fractal Design R5
Audio Device(s) BOSE 2.0
Power Supply Seasonic 850watt
Mouse Logitech Master MX
Keyboard Corsair K70 Cherry MX Blue
VR HMD HTC Vive + Oculus Quest 2
Software Windows 10 P
TUL Corporation, a leading and innovative manufacturer of AMD graphic cards since 1997, has released a new PowerColor Red Dragon RX 550 2GB GDDR5 added in the line of RX 500 series. It is based on AMD's latest GCN 4 architecture designed for GloFo 14nm FinFET that delivers premium VR capability, increased level of performance, smooth VR, seamless support for next-gen gaming monitors and CPU-free game streaming or recording.

Furthermore, the model also supports AMD's optimized DirectX 12,Vulkan Gaming, Radeon FreeSync, and Liquid VR. It has the features of AMD's newest technology called Radeon ReLive which supports 4K, 30 & 60FPS, HEVC & H.264 providing you smooth recording on lower power systems, and Radeon Chill which is an intelligent power-saving feature that regulates dynamically frame rate based on your movement's in-game.



PowerColor Red Dragon RX 550 2GB GDDR5 utilizes 2GB of GDDR5 memory with 512 stream processors, ships with 1190MHz core clock speed, and has 1750MHz (7.0Gbps) memory clock speed which is connected via a new high speed 128-bit memory interface.

To support proper cooling systems for the heat dissipation, RX 550 2GB adopts the one ball + one sleeve fan which increases longevity and efficiency. Besides, the performance is higher 2X than R7 250.



Even for PR this is sketchy as shit. Most 480/1060 struggles with newer VR titles and here we are RX550 trying to put VR over itself in a shady way.
 
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Messages
193 (0.03/day)
Location
Nashville, Tennessee
System Name DeathAdder
Processor Intel Core i7 6700K @4.6 Ghz 1.31v
Motherboard Gigabyte Gaming 7 Z170X
Cooling NZXT Kraken x61 280mm
Memory 4x8GB G.Skill 3200Mhz
Video Card(s) MSI NVidia GeForce 980 Ti 6GB
Storage 2x Samsung 850 EVO 500 GB + 16 TB in HDDs
Display(s) LG UC87C 34" Ultrawide 3440x1440
Case NZXT H440 White
Audio Device(s) JBL LSR310S + 2x JBL LSR308
Power Supply EVGA P2 Platinum 1000 W
Mouse Corsair M65
Keyboard Corsair K70 RGB
Software Windows 10 Pro
This should have been a single slot card, possible even a passive heat sink design. If the heat sink size keeps increasing, we will start seeing GPUs in their own enclosures soon.
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
13,210 (3.80/day)
Location
Sunshine Coast
System Name Black Box
Processor Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5
Motherboard MSI E3 KRAIT Gaming v5
Cooling Tt tower + 120mm Tt fan
Memory G.Skill 16GB 3600 C18
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 970 Mini
Storage Kingston A2000 512Gb NVME
Display(s) AOC 24" Freesync 1m.s. 75Hz
Case Corsair 450D High Air Flow.
Audio Device(s) No need.
Power Supply FSP Aurum 650W
Mouse Yes
Keyboard Of course
Software W10 Pro 64 bit
If the heat sink size keeps increasing, we will start seeing GPUs in their own enclosures soon.
That would be a good thing, for those that have laptops etc.
There are some available already, but still too pricey.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
3,595 (1.26/day)
Based on what AMD said about RX580, the min 400W PSU means this card could pull a lot more than it's 50W TDP...

Also, I love how they're marketing this card as great for "CPU-free game streaming or recording" a month after they said that maybe Ryzen is slower than i7 in gaming, but the extra cores are great for streaming. :)

Honestly: IMO RX560-580 are big disappointments. RX550 at least gives us a card more affordable than RX460 (and maybe less power-hungry).
I'm still waiting for reviews of the low-end stuff: 520-540. That seems to be the only interesting thing in this Polaris refresh. :)
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2016
Messages
2,843 (1.00/day)
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ASRock X670E Taichi
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 Chromax
Memory 32GB DDR5 6000 CL30
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 4090 Trio
Storage Too much
Display(s) Acer Predator XB3 27" 240 Hz
Case Thermaltake Core X9
Audio Device(s) Topping DX5, DCA Aeon II
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Titanium 850w
Mouse G305
Keyboard Wooting HE60
VR HMD Valve Index
Software Win 10
Based on what AMD said about RX580, the min 400W PSU means this card could pull a lot more than it's 50W TDP...

Also, I love how they're marketing this card as great for "CPU-free game streaming or recording" a month after they said that maybe Ryzen is slower than i7 in gaming, but the extra cores are great for streaming. :)

Honestly: IMO RX560-580 are big disappointments. RX550 at least gives us a card more affordable than RX460 (and maybe less power-hungry).
I'm still waiting for reviews of the low-end stuff: 520-540. That seems to be the only interesting thing in this Polaris refresh. :)

Just a heads up, AMD video cards do most of the work on the GPU and thus you can get away with a weaker CPU than Nvidia cards, which offload more work to the CPU. The advertising is pretty sensible, especially if you have a weak CPU.
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2016
Messages
748 (0.28/day)
Based on what AMD said about RX580, the min 400W PSU means this card could pull a lot more than it's 50W TDP...

I doubt this, because I have a unlocked and undervolted RX460 which is exactly double of this card and it uses only around 60W during gaming (maybe 70W with Furmark) - measured via watt meter. This should be 30W or 40W max like the HD7750 was, unless they pumped up the voltage too high.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
3,595 (1.26/day)
Just a heads up, AMD video cards do most of the work on the GPU and thus you can get away with a weaker CPU than Nvidia cards, which offload more work to the CPU. The advertising is pretty sensible, especially if you have a weak CPU.
Correct. But a month ago AMD was telling a client he should replace his 7700K with a Ryzen 1700, because it'll make it easier to stream. Now they're giving him a GPU that promises to take streaming-related stress of the CPU. :)
I have to say... the products they released this year vary in quality (Ryzen easily at the top, followed by so-so chipsets and poor GPUs).
But the advertising and sales strategy? The hype? The very careful control of "leaks"? All excellent.
History of Ryzen launch could join the canon of examples analyzed on marketing studies. It's not just food, cars and cloths any more - PC parts are joining the party :)
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
13,210 (3.80/day)
Location
Sunshine Coast
System Name Black Box
Processor Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5
Motherboard MSI E3 KRAIT Gaming v5
Cooling Tt tower + 120mm Tt fan
Memory G.Skill 16GB 3600 C18
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 970 Mini
Storage Kingston A2000 512Gb NVME
Display(s) AOC 24" Freesync 1m.s. 75Hz
Case Corsair 450D High Air Flow.
Audio Device(s) No need.
Power Supply FSP Aurum 650W
Mouse Yes
Keyboard Of course
Software W10 Pro 64 bit
...Also, I love how they're marketing this card as great for "CPU-free game streaming or recording" a month after they said that maybe Ryzen is slower than i7 in gaming, but the extra cores are great for streaming. :)
Streaming is just one example of how the extra cores can assist while multi tasking, which clearly Ryzen easily beats a 7700K which people care to compare it to.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
3,595 (1.26/day)
Streaming is just one example of how the extra cores can assist while multi tasking, which clearly Ryzen easily beats a 7700K which people care to compare it to.
I know, I know. You can render, simulate phase transitions or do something else... :D

The argument about streaming was used a lot - both by AMD and consumers. Directly after the launch journalists often mentioned that streaming is usually done by GPU anyway, but these voices have faded out in reviews dominated by the excellent benchmark results. :)

I'm by no means trying to discredit the potential of latest AMD's products. But how they've organized the whole release schedule is really impressive (now we know that showing Ryzen 5 a month after 7 was just a first step :)).

I doubt this, because I have a unlocked and undervolted RX460 which is exactly double of this card and it uses only around 60W during gaming (maybe 70W with Furmark) - measured via watt meter. This should be 30W or 40W max like the HD7750 was, unless they pumped up the voltage too high.

I think 40W is what AMD should be targeting - paired with either large passive cooling or simple fans (like with HD7750). It still leaves some space for cheaper models with - potentially - even lower power needs (and these could be passive and single-slot by default).
And I quite miss the HD7750 as well. :D Such a great budget GPU. That was basically the only AMD GPU I considered since the 9500/9600 years ago. Today I'm just to attached to CUDA anyway.
 
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Messages
193 (0.03/day)
Location
Nashville, Tennessee
System Name DeathAdder
Processor Intel Core i7 6700K @4.6 Ghz 1.31v
Motherboard Gigabyte Gaming 7 Z170X
Cooling NZXT Kraken x61 280mm
Memory 4x8GB G.Skill 3200Mhz
Video Card(s) MSI NVidia GeForce 980 Ti 6GB
Storage 2x Samsung 850 EVO 500 GB + 16 TB in HDDs
Display(s) LG UC87C 34" Ultrawide 3440x1440
Case NZXT H440 White
Audio Device(s) JBL LSR310S + 2x JBL LSR308
Power Supply EVGA P2 Platinum 1000 W
Mouse Corsair M65
Keyboard Corsair K70 RGB
Software Windows 10 Pro
That would be a good thing, for those that have laptops etc.
There are some available already, but still too pricey.

For some reason I miss the smaller single slot cards. I think we need to focus more on efficiency and in every generation have some cards that don't require PCIe power connector, for HTPC and casual gaming < 1080p. There are no low end cards or mid range cards nowadays.
 
Top