Share your CPUZ Benchmarks!

[Razor12911]

QX9650 @3.8GHz

 

[CAPSLOCKSTUCK]

Celeronadingdong

 

[fusseli]

kabylake 7700k @ 5ghz

 

[Thimblewad]

Devilish CPU, must say.

 

[Jhelms]

My 1700 with a slight OC, just shy of 3.8

 

[WhiteNoise]

My 7800X

 

[phanbuey]

My 7800X
View attachment 90884

so tempted to get one of these... but the Kaffee Lakes are releasing in 1-2 months.

 

[Jhelms]

Wanted to play and do one more entry. Not bad for a $269 processor (what I paid with heatsink). Had to push it a little hard for this speed but nothing crazy - 1.35V. however monitoring software was showing a tad less than 1.39. Not a great OC mobo.... No LLC and only a 3+3 phase. But hey - ran it all night over 4ghz without an issue. Software, games, prime 95... all was stable. But 25mhz further and she could not handle it without a lot more voltage. Went back to my daily 3.8 however which hardly requires any voltage increase. In short - this system does it no problem. I just have no need to push it in any way for daily use. For $269 this little 1700 is a multi threaded beast

 

[WhiteNoise]

so tempted to get one of these... but the Kaffee Lakes are releasing in 1-2 months.

Yeah with the new chips coming it is worth the wait I'm sure.

 

[phanbuey]

Wanted to play and do one more entry. Not bad for a $269 processor (what I paid with heatsink). Had to push it a little hard for this speed but nothing crazy - 1.35V. however monitoring software was showing a tad less than 1.39. Not a great OC mobo.... No LLC and only a 3+3 phase. But hey - ran it all night over 4ghz without an issue. Software, games, prime 95... all was stable. But 25mhz further and she could not handle it without a lot more voltage. Went back to my daily 3.8 however which hardly requires any voltage increase. In short - this system does it no problem. I just have no need to push it in any way for daily use. For $269 this little 1700 is a multi threaded beast

that is a great overclock for a ryzen... you sure that is stable? damn nice ram & scores too.

 

[johnspack]

My poor old cpu... will have to do a run at 5ghz soon I guess... here's grandpa: oops, it's at 4.7..

 

[phanbuey]

Yeah with the new chips coming it is worth the wait I'm sure.

Some rumors are saying 4+2 kaby lake, and cannonlake as true 6 core... who knows might not be a worthwhile wait.

 

[johnspack]

Just so you know the score above wasn't cheating, my load info:

 

[Jhelms]

that is a great overclock for a ryzen... you sure that is stable? damn nice ram & scores too.

Yep - all was rock solid but it was on the wire for the voltage. Any more than that and it got super power hungry. As I mentioned, 25mhz more and things would fall apart in prime or memtest. As it was - ran excellent However 3.8 seems to be the real sweetspot for my 1700. Barely have to touch voltage and I have run it for periods on stock voltage @ 3.8 - no issues. I only bumped it when I was having ram stability issues at 3330ish and the above timings. Once I dropped back to 3200, all was rock stable and I simply never lowered the cpu voltage back to stock. Will drop it back down tonight and see how it goes.

Ram has been great and very fast. Does everything numbers wise it says it will. RGB on the ram does not work with a crap though. Gskill & Asus are still figuring it all out. So I am stuck with rainbows and unicorn farts for a color theme.

 

[xkm1948]

6950X @ 4.2GHz with 3.5GHz Cache

 

[dylricho]

@xkm1948 — May I ask what voltage you are using to achieve 4.20 GHz on that 6950X? ← no longer required; I got it from your system specs.

Hello guys. I am back after a brief hiatus. Looks like CPU-Z got another update which has improved the balancing between Zen and Skylake, so let's start the 1.8.0.x graphs!

CPU-Z v1.8.0.x — Single-Thread | Multi-Thread

 

[Norton]

1700X running on an Asrock X370 Taichi

Trident Z ram is running happily at 2933 after the latest BIOS update

 

[wally_1973]

 

[FR@NK]

Looks like CPU-Z got another update which has improved the balancing between Zen and Skylake, so let's start the 1.8.0.x graphs!

There is no difference with the new update as it uses the same benchmark version.

 

[dylricho]

There is no difference with the new update as it uses the same benchmark version.

Well, the benchmark figures used for the baselines have all increased slightly.

 

[er557]

@dylricho : can you add me to the MT graph

 

[FR@NK]

Well, the benchmark figures used for the baselines have all increased slightly.

I believe you are confused. The new 1.8.0 update doesn't effect any of the benchmarking compared to the 1.79.X version. See http://www.cpuid.com/news.html for more information.

 

[xkm1948]

The Wife's oooold laptop. 8yrs still going strong. Pretty good for a HP

 

[dylricho]

@dylricho : can you add me to the MT graph

Added, thank you!

I believe you are confused. The new 1.8.0 update doesn't effect any of the benchmarking compared to the 1.79.X version. See http://www.cpuid.com/news.html for more information.

Thank you for the link. I am genuinely intrigued because both the i5-7600K and i7-6700K have the same 4.20 GHz turbo frequency on a single core, and yet the i5 (still incorrectly stated as an i7 in 1.8.0, I see) has a better score in the baseline (508 vs. 474). And 7% is a bit much for a margin of error. You can also see other baselines adjusted below.

 

[Readlight]