• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Futuremark Readies 3DMark TimeSpy Extreme Benchmark

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,885 (7.38/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Futuremark is giving final touches to its top-tier GPU benchmark, 3DMark "TimeSpy Extreme." This benchmark tests your graphics hardware's performance at the 4K Ultra HD (3840 x 2160 pixels) resolution, with the latest DirectX 12 API. You will need a graphics card with at least 4 GB of video memory to run the test. The benchmark will put not just the fastest graphics cards through their paces, but is also designed to take advantage of today's multi-core processors.

3DMark "TimeSpy" Extreme can take advantage of processors with 8 or more CPU cores, and will benefit from the processors supporting the AVX2 instruction-set. Futuremark claims that the CPU tests of "TimeSpy" Extreme will be 3 times more demanding. The company also mentions that it developed the new benchmark while taking inputs from AMD, NVIDIA, and Intel. The benchmark is expected to launch on the 11th of October as an update.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Last edited:
Will AVX2 support both benefit Intel processors in terms of performance and damn these in terms of power consumption? :D
 
You will need a graphics card with at least 4 GB of video memory to run the test.

How will it run with a GTX970?..... (or SLI) :p
I could imagine that it wouldn't run that well because of the 0.5GB slow vram.:ohwell:
 
How will it run with a GTX970?..... (or SLI) :p
I could imagine that it wouldn't run that well because of the 0.5GB slow vram.:ohwell:
It depends. If the benchmark uses 3.25GB of VRAM, you wouldn't expect the requirements to actually say "a video card having at least 3.25GB RAM".
Plus, I don't expect a 970 will do very well in this test even if had 4GB of full speed VRAM. It lacks HP.
 
It depends. If the benchmark uses 3.25GB of VRAM, you wouldn't expect the requirements to actually say "a video card having at least 3.25GB RAM".
Plus, I don't expect a 970 will do very well in this test even if had 4GB of full speed VRAM. It lacks HP.
HP? high performance?
 
Back
Top