• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 and 1600X CPUs Found With 8 Working Cores

Bimg_20171002233041_igrgnctu.png

That's all the proof I need, what more could you ask for?
This is so actually funny in that awesome sort of way!
 
No, it's clearly YOU who "don't get it". Let it go. Just let it go.

Why? If you don't believe it, don't believe it. It's like the bios trick to enable the fourth core on the old AMD three core models. Many didn't want to believe until motherboard makers actually made official bios updates to do it.
This is nothing like the implemented BIOs unlock feature

Sheep can believe what they please without actual evidence

I'll believe what i please as well
 
That's true.
Bcuz It was first discovered in Korea on September 26. Someone has already tested.
This address contains cpu-z&hwmornitor 1600 x core issue benchmark test information.
(with Photo)
http://blog.naver.com/hyunnni87/221110492220

#CPU-Z SIMPLE TEST
1600x (8core 16thread) - Single 459 Multi 4786 <Core issue>

1700x (8core 16thread) - Single 385 Multi 4271

1800x (8core 16thread) - Single 400 Multi 4542
 
This may indicate a quality control issue at this specific AMD factory. Alternatively, AMD could be bolstering its stock of Ryzen 5 1600 and 1600X CPUs to meet the higher demand of the mid-range chip, by labeling 1800 and 1800X CPUs as 1600 and 1600X respectively.

Not surprising since the six core Ryzen offer the best bang for the buck
 
6e9bed87-7d59-48e3-8c6d-2f176ebaf8f4.jpg


Man I scored big
 
6e9bed87-7d59-48e3-8c6d-2f176ebaf8f4.jpg


Man I scored big
Is this your continuing statement about not believing? The difference is that your screenshot is an obvious fake as the font you used for the "12" and "24" are different and don't match the size of the rest of the text. The other screen shots posted above are far more believable as they don't seem to have been doctored like yours. Sad, just sad..
EDIT; You also forgot to modify the caches..
 
Last edited:
+11111111111 Durvele GG
 
That screen shot and what you do to prove you are right is sad really.

Well the original forum post from korea had screen photographs showing cinebench and CPU Z benchmark + cpu and cpu box photographs. this does not prove that the 8C/16T thread 1600x's are real, but if they aren't the "scam" was a little more elaborate than changing some numbers on a screenshot.
 
Well the original forum post from korea had screen photographs showing cinebench and CPU Z benchmark + cpu and cpu box photographs. this does not prove that the 8C/16T thread 1600x's are real, but if they aren't the "scam" was a little more elaborate than changing some numbers on a screenshot.
Let's wait to hear from AMD on this one. Besides, if this were a scam, what could possibly be gained?
 
Let's wait to hear from AMD on this one. Besides, if this were a scam, what could possibly be gained?

AMD will deny it, I bet. Just to troll the entire hardware sites and forums?
 
Back
Top