• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Samsung PM971 NVMe SSD Surfaces

Raevenlord

News Editor
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
3,755 (1.15/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name The Ryzening
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard MSI X570 MAG TOMAHAWK
Cooling Lian Li Galahad 360mm AIO
Memory 32 GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3733 (4x 8 GB)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 3070 Ti
Storage Boot: Transcend MTE220S 2TB, Kintson A2000 1TB, Seagate Firewolf Pro 14 TB
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG270UP (1440p 144 Hz IPS)
Case Lian Li O11DX Dynamic White
Audio Device(s) iFi Audio Zen DAC
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ 750 W
Mouse Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Software Windows 10 x64
Last week, we were introduced to Samsung's upcoming PM981 SSDs, which should give way to higher-performance parts such as the 980 series. Today, however, it's the slightly lower-tier PM971 platform that has surfaced, which should give way to Samsung 970 series of NVMe SSDs. Remember that the company seems to be moving away from their "EVO" and "PRO" monikers as performance differentiators, and this new nomenclature series should replace it come launch time.

The PM971-based SSDs will feature a 22mm x 16mm x 1.5mm multi-chip package that includes Samsung's Proton controller, LPDDR4 DRAM cache, and V-NAND flash into a single chip. As was to be expected from a more mainstream solution, performance will be noticeably lower (at least in pure numbers) when compared to the higher-tier 980 series.





Whereas the 512 GB version of the 980 series is expected to deliver 3,000 MB/s read and 1,800 MB/s write speeds (sequential), the 970 series' 512 GB part should deliver up to 1,500 MB/s sequential read and up to 900 MB/s sequential write speeds - which are more than enough for all but the most demanding users, and shouldn't deliver that different of an experience.

Samsung claims random performance up to 190,000 IOPS read and 170,000 IOPS write, which are in line with other known performance metrics. Initial capacities should be available in 128 GB, 256 GB, and 512 GB parts, though with the advent of higher density 64-layer TLC and QLC V-NAND on the horizon, capacities are very likely to increase in time.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Samsung does seem to know how to keep making higher performing drives with each generation while competitors are barely able to keep with older drives from samsung.
 
Samsung does seem to know how to keep making higher performing drives with each generation while competitors are barely able to keep with older drives from samsung.

Well it helps when they make their own NAND and controllers specifically for their drives.
 
I liked to use before CORSAIR SSD, but Samsung is leader last 3 years in SATA III SSD and M.2 NVMe SSD Market.
Now I look first Samsung and Intel. But I expect always to find nicer performance for price with Samsung.
They could become leaders and with DDR4 memory and DDR5 later. Only if they launch some cool desktop memory with heatsinks.
But they like more to sell modules and CORSAIR, Kingston, GSkill to optimize them with different platforms. There Samsung lose significant price than if they decide to offer high end DDR4 directly to customers.
But only I know for sure is that Dominator Platinum will look better.
 
Just to recap with this new name nomenclature, the PM971 Would be the new EVO and PM981 Would be the new Pro?

Also it looks like to me this time around the PRO would have a lot of performance over the EVO line, ¿that statement would be accurate?

PD: Humble user of a Samsung EVO 840

Regards
 
Just to recap with this new name nomenclature, the PM971 Would be the new EVO and PM981 Would be the new Pro?

Also it looks like to me this time around the PRO would have a lot of performance over the EVO line, ¿that statement would be accurate?

PD: Humble user of a Samsung EVO 840

Regards

That is how I understood it also
 
Just to recap with this new name nomenclature, the PM971 Would be the new EVO and PM981 Would be the new Pro?

Also it looks like to me this time around the PRO would have a lot of performance over the EVO line, ¿that statement would be accurate?

PD: Humble user of a Samsung EVO 840

Regards

Not exactly... PM is reserved for TLC released only to distributors for notebook production. The 970/980 will have similar (but significantly better) performance using V-NANDS

See: SM951 vs 950 EVO/PRO
 
Back
Top