• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

PCI SIG Releases PCI-Express Gen 4.0 Specifications

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,878 (7.38/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
The Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) special interest group (SIG) published the first official specification (version 1.0) of PCI-Express gen 4.0 bus. The specification's previous draft 0.9 was under technical review by members of the SIG. The new generation PCIe comes with double the bandwidth of PCI-Express gen 3.0, reduced latency, lane margining, and I/O virtualization capabilities. With the specification published, one can expect end-user products implementing it. PCI SIG has now turned its attention to the even newer PCI-Express gen 5.0 specification, which will be close to ready by mid-2019.

PCI-Express gen 4.0 comes with 16 GT/s bandwidth per-lane, per-direction, which is double that of gen 3.0. An M.2 NVMe drive implementing it, for example, will have 64 Gbps of interface bandwidth at its disposal. The SIG has also been steered toward lowering the latencies of the interconnect as HPC hardware designers are turning toward alternatives such as NVLink and InfinityFabric, not primarily for the bandwidth, but the lower latency. Lane margining is a new feature that allows hardware to maintain a uniform physical layer signal clarity across multiple PCIe devices connected to a common root complex. This is particularly important when you have multiple pieces of mission-critical hardware (such as RAID HBAs or HPC accelerators), and require uniform performance across them. The new specification also adds new I/O virtualization features that should prove useful in HPC and cloud computing.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The new generation PCIe comes with double the bandwidth of PCI-Express gen 3.0, reduced latency, lane magining, and I/O virtualization capabilities.

Lane magining... man I've been waiting for this almost as long as I've been waiting for TPU to hire a proofreader who is actually literate.
 
Lane magining... man I've been waiting for this almost as long as I've been waiting for TPU to hire a proofreader who is actually literate.

Using the word "literate" is a bit harsh, don't you think?

I know I made typoes. It's vs Its was my favorite. It doesn't mean I didn't try to fix them as fast as I could.
 
How many watts will each slot output? I heard rumors awhile back about like 150w or something over 75w.

Also you guys shouldn't be so fixated on a typo; the world will continue.
 
Lane magining... man I've been waiting for this almost as long as I've been waiting for TPU to hire a proofreader who is actually literate.
Typos are part and parcel of news sites, it's better to take in gist of the story. You need to see kind of typos mainstream news outlet make while reporting on technology and compared to that these are quite few and far in between.
 
Lane magining... man I've been waiting for this almost as long as I've been waiting for TPU to hire a proofreader who is actually literate.
'magine you had all of them lanes.....
 
Fixed. And I thought you were discussing the actual technology
 
Fixed. And I thought you were discussing the actual technology
People's priorities.... :ohwell:

Regarding this gen 4.0, does this mean we can finally have RAID 5 for M.2 SSD drives on non-HEDT platforms? ;)
 
Better not go to Guru3D then :D

Using the word "literate" is a bit harsh, don't you think?

Of course it's harsh. It's harsh because I'm trying to make a point (also because I'm a dick but that should come as a surprise to nobody). That point is that even the most basic spellchecker (including the one built into any web browser) would have flagged "magining" as a non-word, which means that the only way it could have got into a published news post is if nobody bothered to do the absolute bare minimum of even looking at the wavy red underlines before pressing the button.

That might be acceptable for the barely-coherent English-Dutch pidgin that Guru3D's Hilbert excretes, but I've come to expect higher standards from TPU. I don't criticise because it makes me feel better or superior, I criticise because I care about the quality and professionalism of this site's content. And yeah, maybe public shaming isn't the best way to do it, but honestly it should never have happened in the first place.

I know I made typoes. It's vs Its was my favorite. It doesn't mean I didn't try to fix them as fast as I could.

It's vs its is semi-acceptable because a spellchecker won't (and can't) flag that case.
 
As for the news itself, it seems to me that PCIe 4.0 and up are going to be more focused on enterprise than consumer features. Which IMO makes sense, because PCIe 3.0 has already been around for half a decade on desktop and isn't really showing any signs that it needs to be replaced.

What will be interesting is to see how (and when) Intel and AMD implement this on their CPU and motherboards. I'm expecting Intel to do their standard cheap-assery and offer half the number of lanes they currently do (so instead of 16 lanes of 3.0 from their mainstream CPUs, we'll get 8x 4.0 lanes, although I can hope that they will go with 12 lanes so that M.2 devices aren't bottlenecked through the chipset). I guess it will depend on the actual hardware requirements of PCIe 4.0 i.e. trace thickness.
 
Fixed. And I thought you were discussing the actual technology
that was my exact reaction - I red the article and tought to my self: "damn, those are pretty big news, and there are lot of comments... I hope I will read them to make more insight when will 4.0 hit market and when/why 5.0"... and all comments are about meaningless typo :confused:
 
I recently built a new PC, I am not buying an entirely new system in the next 5-6 years or so. If they manage to launch PCIe 4.0 into serial production and GPU's to actually utilize it by this period, then I will see it when I buy my new computer. Until then, I don't really get excited.

@Assimilator that burn man, that burn :D Reading the first comment for the news, I was like : ohhh snap :D
 
Last edited:
People's priorities.... :ohwell:

Regarding this gen 4.0, does this mean we can finally have RAID 5 for M.2 SSD drives on non-HEDT platforms? ;)
Meh pcie 5.0 is coming soon enough, maybe it'll be mainstream by 2020 even, possibly for servers!
 
Intel announced a pcie 4 capable SSD.

It means it current HEDT may live a short life...
 
Of course it's harsh. It's harsh because I'm trying to make a point (also because I'm a dick but that should come as a surprise to nobody). That point is that even the most basic spellchecker (including the one built into any web browser) would have flagged "magining" as a non-word, which means that the only way it could have got into a published news post is if nobody bothered to do the absolute bare minimum of even looking at the wavy red underlines before pressing the button.

That might be acceptable for the barely-coherent English-Dutch pidgin that Guru3D's Hilbert excretes, but I've come to expect higher standards from TPU. I don't criticise because it makes me feel better or superior, I criticise because I care about the quality and professionalism of this site's content. And yeah, maybe public shaming isn't the best way to do it, but honestly it should never have happened in the first place.



It's vs its is semi-acceptable because a spellchecker won't (and can't) flag that case.
There are errors in your post, correct them and try again.
 
...if the only thing you care about is PCIe 4.0, sure.
And only if that PCIe 4 SSD is able to saturate PCIe 3.0 bandwidth in the first place would it be worth it. ;)



Also, to the writers and editors... may I suggest a browser plugin Grammarly. :)
 
It's vs its is semi-acceptable because a spellchecker won't (and can't) flag that case.

Complains about typos, but can't follow basic rules of not double posting. Hypocrite much?

@EarthDog I use Grammarly, and it doesn't pick everything up unfortunately, especially when there's tonnes of html/bbs coding. Spellcheckers in code don't work. :p

For example, that word, tonnes. That's plain English. But not American English. It's actual value is different, even (1.102 short tons US). Do you know how many spell checkers flag that as wrong? Nearly every one. If they can't get THAT right, they can get lots of other things wrong too.

AS to the news, I don't think that this could come soon enough. We need faster drives overall, and SATA just doesn't cut it these days. It would be nice if mechanical drives could be faster, but I don't know if that's even possible. :P
 
Nothing picks up everything, but it would pick up quite a bit of the errors we see daily in these news articles. Also, don't use it on code...why would that work on code in the first place???

This place needs a gatekeeper BEFORE the news articles are published. Of the many that go up in a day, I would say a few have easily correctable errors which an editor should catch. Many of which Grammarly would catch. Again, it isn't perfect, but it's a lot better than nothing. :)

RE: tonnes/tons, etc.... your EIC needs to pick a writing style and have the team stick to it.
 
Nothing picks up everything, but it would pick up quite a bit of the errors we see daily in these news articles. Also, don't use it on code...why would that work on code in the first place???

This place needs a gatekeeper BEFORE the news articles are published. Of the many that go up in a day, I would say a few have easily correctable errors which an editor should catch. Many of which Grammarly would catch. Again, it isn't perfect, but it's a lot better than nothing. :)

RE: tonnes/tons, etc.... your EIC needs to pick a writing style and have the team stick to it.

Are you going to keep being an ass or are you volunteering?
Give them a break, were lucky enough that they post news articles. A few typos isn't the end of the world, seriously. I promise that you won't die.
 
I know I'm going to get a warning, but it's all worth it, however, seriously, some people in here are plain real hypocritical ASSHOLES. I saw native English speaking writers doing way worst mistakes than this on huge sites like CNN, BBC, etc.
Just give the guy a break for fk sake! How many foreign languages do you speak btw?? And I mean fluently. Jeeeeez!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Back on topic, Dave is right. I'm only looking to the PCIE bandwidth for the NVMe SSDs primary.
Seems that, for some reason (overhead), the current PCIE 3.0 x4 lines gets fully saturated on the latest Samsung 960 Pro drives. This can be easily seen when doing a RAID0 with 2 of those drives that caps at ~3.5GB/s for both reads/writes, when already a single drive can do 3.5GB/s for the reads.

Cannot wait for PCIE 4.0 motherboards.
 
Back on topic, Dave is right. I'm only looking to the PCIE bandwidth for the NVMe SSDs primary.
Seems that, for some reason (overhead), the current PCIE 3.0 x4 lines gets fully saturated on the latest Samsung 960 Pro drives. This can be easily seen when doing a RAID0 with 2 of those drives that caps at ~3.5GB/s for both reads/writes, when already a single drive can do 3.5GB/s for the reads.
Cannot wait for PCIE 4.0 motherboards.

I wonder if AM4 and TR4 will be updated this year to have pcie 4.0 motherboards, and if intel is going to release z470 for that, claim they "needed to update it" :P
 
Back
Top