• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Releases Radeon Software Crimson ReLive 17.11.4 Drivers

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,949 (7.37/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
AMD today put out its fourth Radeon Software release of the month, the Radeon Software Crimson ReLive 17.11.4 Beta. These drivers come with optimization for "Doom" VFR, and Oculus Dash Open Beta. The drivers fix an issue with certain levels of HBCC size adjustments causing system instability on machines with Radeon RX Vega series graphics cards. It also fixes a system hang noticed when switching display modes on "Star Wars Battlefront II" on CrossFire machines. Also fixed, are incorrect clock and power values being reported on some machines with RX Vega series graphics cards. Grab the drivers from the link below.



DOWNLOAD: AMD Radeon Software Crimson ReLive 17.11.4

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Doesn't really affect performance the way you think it would anyway. I've noticed that drivers that limit overclocking actually perform better than those that let you overclock higher. Basically the increased overclockability comes from the card not working as hard with the specific drivers. And the higher clocks don't make up for it.
 
Doesn't really affect performance the way you think it would anyway. I've noticed that drivers that limit overclocking actually perform better than those that let you overclock higher. Basically the increased overclockability comes from the card not working as hard with the specific drivers. And the higher clocks don't make up for it.

That's never been true for me. Rarely do they break my overclocks, they usually make them more stable in fact.

There was just one early this year that made my 460 overclock worse, but it did seem to mine better afterwards.
 
Had it as long as it’s been available, it’s not new.
Thanks for the info. Didn't know about that. Fury isn't so much neglected from the AMD driver team then. HBM OC needs to be re-enabled and some newer games need to be optimised to get on par to Polaris and Vega archs.
 
Thanks for the info. Didn't know about that. Fury isn't so much neglected from the AMD driver team then. HBM OC needs to be re-enabled and some newer games need to be optimised to get on par to Polaris and Vega archs.
Oh believe me I was surprised to see the switch available, not like I have any use for it. Fury the most neglected flagship ever...
 
Thanks for the info. Didn't know about that. Fury isn't so much neglected from the AMD driver team then. HBM OC needs to be re-enabled and some newer games need to be optimised to get on par to Polaris and Vega archs.

Correct me if I am wrong, but most games that show "Fury aging badly" are simply due to VRAM size right? I mean someone could just lower textures from Ultra to High...
 
Correct me if I am wrong, but most games that show "Fury aging badly" are simply due to VRAM size right? I mean someone could just lower textures from Ultra to High...
Sure thing, but some driver optimisations could help also me thinks.
 
Sure thing, but some driver optimisations could help also me thinks.

I mean maybe haha. But then again Fury is just a half-step between GCN 1.1 and Polaris. GCN has been incredibly optimized for years.

All I am saying is the Fury series generally performs as strongly as a 1070 (Or even a 1080 in a couple games) as long as you keep the VRAM size in check. I would say that's about as good as it will ever get.
 
Back
Top