• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Intel to Deploy Management Engine Lock to Prevent Disabling, Rollback

voltage said:
I really don't want to move back to AMD product for a number of reasons, but this issue is really me make me re-think doing so. Then again, I dont have much of anything to hide, it boils down to principle I suppose. I just don't like the idea Intel has implemented this without disclosure from the start. That said, I am very curious what kind of performance increase Intel's 10nm will have. Even if it was just another 10-15% over coffee lake, I would be satisfied, because I am still using a old i7 870, but it works great! I suppose ME wont go away? I do wonder will AMD implement a version of ME?
Click to expand...

Unfortunately AMD has their own version of ME, it's called Platform Security Processor (PSP).
 
voltage said:
I really don't want to move back to AMD product for a number of reasons
Click to expand...
Moving to AMD gets you the same embedded (ARM Cortex A5 using ARM's Trustzone) security processor.
 
R-T-B said:
My brothers x58 system had management engine drivers IIRC, board was a dx58so2.

Either way, it's present on anything newer than or equal to a core 2. Whether or not there are drivers, it's there.
Click to expand...

I had an X58/920 system too and there was no IME installation drivers for those boards. Here is the link for the driver support for the Asus P6X58-D Premium motherboard, and there are no IME drivers in the list:

https://www.asus.com/au/supportonly/P6X58D Premium/HelpDesk_Download/

And here is the link for a Asus P67/Sandybridge board that does have IME installation drivers:

https://www.asus.com/au/supportonly/P8H67-I Deluxe/HelpDesk_Download/

Maybe they used them on xeon or something like that, but the Sandy Bridge systems was the first mainstream/consumer platform that used IME installation drivers, that was around 2010. I never like having to install those drivers. I dont know why, I think because I never really understood what they do, besides "security"
 
buggalugs said:
I never like having to install those drivers. I dont know why, I think because I never really understood what they do, besides "security"
Click to expand...
Also gets rid of the yellow exclamation icon in Device Manager.
 
ah, so no choice really. since you seem to know much regarding this issue. AMD X86 procs do not use ARM architecture. Are you suggesting AMD took Trustzone security processor and added it to their X86 platforms??? wow if yes...
 
voltage said:
ah, so no choice really. since you seem to know much regarding this issue. AMD X86 procs do not use ARM architecture. Are you suggesting AMD took Trustzone security processor and added it to their X86 platforms??? wow if yes...
Click to expand...

I'm not certain, but I think the "security processor" in AMD CPUs actually is an ARM core. It doesn't have to be x86 and until recently Intel didn't use an x86 one either.

The security processor is an extra processor added to the main CPU, it doesn't have to be anything like the main cores.
 
OK, got ya. Then, knowing all this info. I ask you your opinion, Why is it that the entire web is freaking out (exaggerating of course to make a point) over Intel's ME, yet no one bitched, moaned or complained over AMD's version??? (ARM's Trustzone)
Another way to ask the same question, why all the Intel bashing and no AMD bashing? any idea as to why?
 
Last edited:
voltage said:
OK, got ya. Then, knowing all this info. I ask you your opinion, Why is it that the entire web is freaking out (exaggerating of course to make a point) over Intel's ME, yet no one bitched, moaned or complained over AMD's version??? (ARM's Trustzone)
Another way to ask the same question, why all the Intel bashing and no AMD bashing? any idea as to why?
Click to expand...

Possibly because it was recently discovered that Intel ME runs the MINIX operating system and subsequently there have been some bugs and security holes found in it. That and everyone knows about Intel and few know about AMD.
 
voltage said:
Yet, in 2009 there was this claiming MINIX is more secure than Windows itself OR even more secure than Linux. https://www.infoq.com/news/2009/05/MINIX

I suppose its a never ending subject, no matter the angle.
Click to expand...

It's not hard to be more secure than linux actually... and that has been the argument between Linus and Tanenbaum since the beginning. Or rather, the argument of monolithic vs microkernels.
 
StrayKAT said:
Unpopular, but it's not going to affect the typical user either way. Still, everyone should have options. These are PCs, after all.
Click to expand...

It is when spyware begins to hijack it.

voltage said:
I do wonder will AMD implement a version of ME?
Click to expand...

They already have, for some time. It's called the AMD PSP.
 
R-T-B said:
It is when spyware begins to hijack it.
Click to expand...

Well, personally, that's not a concern of mine. I haven't had spyware problems for ages... but I'm probably more dilligent than others.

I'd be more worried about a specifically targetted attack.. I can see getting really screwed by a personal enemy (or if I had a business with enemies). But I'm under the radar here too. As are many.
 
StrayKAT said:
Well, personally, that's not a concern of mine. I haven't had spyware problems for ages... but I'm probably more dilligent than others.
Click to expand...

I haven't either. But we aren't really normal use cases, as you note.
 
OSdevr said:
:mad:

If I'm not mistaken Intel switched to an x86 core with Skylake and were using a different architecture before. Why they didn't use an x86 core to begin with I have no idea.

EDIT: Can't find a source saying they switched architectures with Skylake but they did at least change a great deal of it according to me_cleaner. Also Libreboot agrees that it began in 2006 on the northbridge and was moved onto the CPU with Nehalem (aka the first of the Core i series).
Click to expand...

You're correct that they used to use a different CPU architecture before, it was running on an ARC core in the early days - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARC_(processor)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Active_Management_Technology#Hardware
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top