• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Reveals Specs of Ryzen 2000G "Raven Ridge" APUs

Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (1.94/day)
These are desktop APU's. But being a 65W solution and if it can run modern games at 1080p using medium settings, that's impressive. Seeing how fast Stoney Ridge APU is being a low end part on old 28nm process, these Ryzen ones are gone be nice for those tiny PC's.
 

Mussels

Freshwater Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
58,413 (8.21/day)
Location
Oystralia
System Name Rainbow Sparkles (Power efficient, <350W gaming load)
Processor Ryzen R7 5800x3D (Undervolted, 4.45GHz all core)
Motherboard Asus x570-F (BIOS Modded)
Cooling Alphacool Apex UV - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora + EK Quantum ARGB 3090 w/ active backplate
Memory 2x32GB DDR4 3600 Corsair Vengeance RGB @3866 C18-22-22-22-42 TRFC704 (1.4V Hynix MJR - SoC 1.15V)
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 3090 SG 24GB: Underclocked to 1700Mhz 0.750v (375W down to 250W))
Storage 2TB WD SN850 NVME + 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 1TB Intel 6000P NVME USB 3.2
Display(s) Phillips 32 32M1N5800A (4k144), LG 32" (4K60) | Gigabyte G32QC (2k165) | Phillips 328m6fjrmb (2K144)
Case Fractal Design R6
Audio Device(s) Logitech G560 | Corsair Void pro RGB |Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply Fractal Ion+ 2 860W (Platinum) (This thing is God-tier. Silent and TINY)
Mouse Logitech G Pro wireless + Steelseries Prisma XL
Keyboard Razer Huntsman TE ( Sexy white keycaps)
VR HMD Oculus Rift S + Quest 2
Software Windows 11 pro x64 (Yes, it's genuinely a good OS) OpenRGB - ditch the branded bloatware!
Benchmark Scores Nyooom.
I wonder what kind of performance these would give if tweaked into a console design
 

iO

Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Messages
526 (0.12/day)
Location
Germany
Processor R7 5700x
Motherboard MSI B450i Gaming
Cooling Accelero Mono CPU Edition
Memory 16 GB VLP
Video Card(s) AMD RX 6700 XT
Storage P34A80 512GB
Display(s) LG 27UM67 UHD
Case none
Power Supply SS G-650
Too bad current memory prices ruin a cheap build with these chip a bit.
I wonder what kind of performance these would give if tweaked into a console design

Not that much if you consider the PS4 pro and XBoneX have 36 and 40 CUs compared to this chips 11...
 
Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
85 (0.03/day)
It's impressive because the GPU + CPU is 15W. Show me another GPU with 15W that can do better?
You're totally missing my point. How is this impressive, it's well known that AMD can woop Intels iGPU solutions anyday. Regarding the CPU part is good, not impressive. This has been a long time for AMD.
So short sum, good CPU, underwhelming iGPU.
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
3,475 (0.85/day)
System Name Skunkworks
Processor 5800x3d
Motherboard x570 unify
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A
Memory 32GB 3600 mhz
Video Card(s) asrock 6800xt challenger D
Storage Sabarent rocket 4.0 2TB, MX 500 2TB
Display(s) Asus 1440p144 27"
Case Old arse cooler master 932
Power Supply Corsair 1200w platinum
Mouse *squeak*
Keyboard Some old office thing
Software openSUSE tumbleweed/Mint 21.2
You're totally missing my point. How is this impressive, it's well known that AMD can woop Intels iGPU solutions anyday. Regarding the CPU part is good, not impressive. This has been a long time for AMD.
So short sum, good CPU, underwhelming iGPU.
How is it unimpressive when this chip performs significantly faster then AMD's last 15 watt part, setting a new bar for iGPU performance?

If you let yourself believe you were getting a RX480 in a 15 watt part, of course it will be unimpressive, but that is because your expectations are completely unrealistic. For those of us with realistic expectations, this part looks like quite the upgrade from the current 28nm excavator chips.

EDIT: these are desktop parts, but the point still stands. These are a major step up from AMD's last 65 watt parts, especially for any games that are CPU demanding. Thanks to @RejZoR
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
85 (0.03/day)
How is it unimpressive when this chip performs significantly faster then AMD's last 15 watt part, setting a new bar for iGPU performance?

If you let yourself believe you were getting a RX480 in a 15 watt part, of course it will be unimpressive, but that is because your expectations are completely unrealistic. For those of us with realistic expectations, this part looks like quite the upgrade from the current 28nm excavator chips.

EDIT: these are desktop parts, but the point still stands. These are a major step up from AMD's last 65 watt parts, especially for any games that are CPU demanding. Thanks to @RejZoR
Because it's underwhelming for what most have waited for plus I never stated nor believe we will get RX480 power in a such factor. However I will state as mentioned before. The iGPU is underwhelming and it's not something to debate about it, it's pure facts. The CPU is good and will make the market a bit more competitive.
Also last thing, I don't expect these laptops to perform anything godly, that's not their purpose.
As for the desktop APU, I can't say anything but I hope it won't be as bad as the laptop APUs since they didn't show anything special.
 
Joined
Sep 19, 2016
Messages
43 (0.02/day)
Processor Ryzen 5950X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aurus Master
Cooling Corsair H115i
Memory 32GB (16x2) Crucial DDR4 3200
Video Card(s) Powercolor Radeon RX 480 Red Devil 8GB
Storage 2TB Adata SX8200, 1TB Corsair MP510, 4TB WDC Red, 3TB WDC Black, 6TB Ironwolf, 250GB 850 evo
Display(s) LG 4k 27"
Case Nanoxia Deep Silence 6
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z906
Power Supply 660W Seasonic Platinum Prime
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech
Software Windows 10
Because it's underwhelming for what most have waited for plus I never stated nor believe we will get RX480 power in a such factor. However I will state as mentioned before. The iGPU is underwhelming and it's not something to debate about it, it's pure facts. The CPU is good and will make the market a bit more competitive.
Also last thing, I don't expect these laptops to perform anything godly, that's not their purpose.
As for the desktop APU, I can't say anything but I hope it won't be as bad as the laptop APUs since they didn't show anything special.

If you are saying they are bad based on the Ryzen 5 2500U then things to understand the 2500U is a VEGA 8 part using DDR4 2400. So the GPU is similar to the 2500U but is using memory slower than what is possible on the desktop chips. AMD showed a slide about the 2400G GPU being overclocked along with the memory and it's performance in firestrike. At stock DDR4-2400 the 2400G is capable of a score of 2911 using DDR4-3200 (Stock clocks) it is capable of a score of 3322 which is a 14% performance boost on memory alone. It should be noted that the A12-9800 scores 1954 in firestrike. The Ryzen 5 2500U is around 2042.

Slide -> https://www.pcper.com/news/Processors/CES-2018-AMD-Ryzen-Desktop-CPU-Ryzen-Graphics-Coming-Feb-12
 
Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
85 (0.03/day)
If you are saying they are bad based on the Ryzen 5 2500U then things to understand the 2500U is a VEGA 8 part using DDR4 2400. So the GPU is similar to the 2500U but is using memory slower than what is possible on the desktop chips. AMD showed a slide about the 2400G GPU being overclocked along with the memory and it's performance in firestrike. At stock DDR4-2400 the 2400G is capable of a score of 2911 using DDR4-3200 (Stock clocks) it is capable of a score of 3322 which is a 14% performance boost on memory alone. It should be noted that the A12-9800 scores 1954 in firestrike. The Ryzen 5 2500U is around 2042.

Slide -> https://www.pcper.com/news/Processors/CES-2018-AMD-Ryzen-Desktop-CPU-Ryzen-Graphics-Coming-Feb-12
Synthetic benchmarks aren't comparable in real life usage, it reflects differently overall, plus is thermal limit an issue. Again, I am not mainly interested in the mobile APU and more concern about the desktop APU
 
Joined
Feb 17, 2010
Messages
1,475 (0.29/day)
Location
Azalea City
System Name Main
Processor Ryzen 5950x
Motherboard B550 PG Velocita
Cooling Water
Memory Ballistix
Video Card(s) RX 6900XT
Storage T-FORCE CARDEA A440 PRO
Display(s) Samsung UE590
Case QUBE 500
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z623
Power Supply LEADEX V 1KW
Mouse Cooler Master MM710
Keyboard Huntsman Elite
Software 11 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://hwbot.org/user/damric/
$99. Can it mine? I could see these selling like hot cakes.
 
Joined
Sep 19, 2016
Messages
43 (0.02/day)
Processor Ryzen 5950X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aurus Master
Cooling Corsair H115i
Memory 32GB (16x2) Crucial DDR4 3200
Video Card(s) Powercolor Radeon RX 480 Red Devil 8GB
Storage 2TB Adata SX8200, 1TB Corsair MP510, 4TB WDC Red, 3TB WDC Black, 6TB Ironwolf, 250GB 850 evo
Display(s) LG 4k 27"
Case Nanoxia Deep Silence 6
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z906
Power Supply 660W Seasonic Platinum Prime
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech
Software Windows 10
Synthetic benchmarks aren't comparable in real life usage, it reflects differently overall, plus is thermal limit an issue. Again, I am not mainly interested in the mobile APU and more concern about the desktop APU

Considering I talked mostly about the desktop APU I'm not sure why you mentioned concern about the mobile APU in your response to me. Considering the only information we have is Synthetic benchmarks what do you expect? I know I compared the performance of the desktop APU's Firestrike score to the mobile APU's firestrike score and the current top desktop APU the A12-9800's. This was to give a baseline performance comparison in a similar situation. From this we can draw that the Vega 11 APU in the desktop chip is a bit more than 50% faster than the Ryzen 5 2500U mobile APU and the current fastest Desktop APU the A12-9800 (AM4) in purely graphical situations. This GPU can also be boosted up about 33% (Again in firestrike) via GPU clock and memory clocks. Comparable AMD desktop chips with these numbers are the 7770 Ghz edition (scores around 3000) and the RX 550 (scores around 4000).

Yeah it would be nice to have numbers in games that can be used for comparison. Although we do have some we don't have comparable numbers. The numbers do show that the 2400G should allow someone to play any game off the shelf without needing to buy an off the shelf GPU to even play the game (which right now would be a task in itself thankyou Crypto Miners)
 
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
4,267 (0.70/day)
Location
Sanford, FL, USA
Processor Intel i5-6600
Motherboard ASRock H170M-ITX
Cooling Cooler Master Geminii S524
Memory G.Skill DDR4-2133 16GB (8GB x 2)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte R9-380X 4GB
Storage Samsung 950 EVO 250GB (mSATA)
Display(s) LG 29UM69G-B 2560x1080 IPS
Case Lian Li PC-Q25
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892
Power Supply Seasonic SS-460FL2
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech G110
Software Windows 10 Pro
Cool, I have an A8-5500 (Trinity) box to upgrade. All I need from the R5-2400G is to be > than that.
 
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
7,762 (3.08/day)
Location
Back in Norway
System Name Hotbox
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, 110/95/110, PBO +150Mhz, CO -7,-7,-20(x6),
Motherboard ASRock Phantom Gaming B550 ITX/ax
Cooling LOBO + Laing DDC 1T Plus PWM + Corsair XR5 280mm + 2x Arctic P14
Memory 32GB G.Skill FlareX 3200c14 @3800c15
Video Card(s) PowerColor Radeon 6900XT Liquid Devil Ultimate, UC@2250MHz max @~200W
Storage 2TB Adata SX8200 Pro
Display(s) Dell U2711 main, AOC 24P2C secondary
Case SSUPD Meshlicious
Audio Device(s) Optoma Nuforce μDAC 3
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Logitech G603
Keyboard Keychron K3/Cooler Master MasterKeys Pro M w/DSA profile caps
Software Windows 10 Pro
Hasn't this been up on AMD's site since their pre-CES event? At least base/boost frequencies, GPU CU count and TDP has been freely available for a while.

Now, gief reviews plz.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
2,986 (0.96/day)
Location
Argentina
System Name Ciel
Processor AMD Ryzen R5 5600X
Motherboard Asus Tuf Gaming B550 Plus
Cooling ID-Cooling 224-XT Basic
Memory 2x 16GB Kingston Fury 3600MHz@3933MHz
Video Card(s) Gainward Ghost 3060 Ti 8GB + Sapphire Pulse RX 6600 8GB
Storage NVMe Kingston KC3000 2TB + NVMe Toshiba KBG40ZNT256G + HDD WD 4TB
Display(s) Gigabyte G27Q + AOC 19'
Case Cougar MX410 Mesh-G
Audio Device(s) Kingston HyperX Cloud Stinger Core 7.1 Wireless PC
Power Supply Aerocool KCAS-500W
Mouse Logitech G203
Keyboard VSG Alnilam
Software Windows 11 x64
The IGP performance looks pretty good, it's a good upgrade from the 8 CUs of previous APUs (plus GPU and RAM frequency are higher), but I would have expected the 2200 to have 8 instead of 6 CUs.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
3,204 (1.24/day)
Location
North East Ohio, USA
System Name My Ryzen 7 7700X Super Computer
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
Motherboard Gigabyte B650 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling DeepCool AK620 with Arctic Silver 5
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 NEO DDR5 EXPO (CL30)
Video Card(s) XFX AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Storage Samsung 980 EVO 1 TB NVMe SSD (System Drive), Samsung 970 EVO 500 GB NVMe SSD (Game Drive)
Display(s) Acer Nitro XV272U (DisplayPort) and Acer Nitro XV270U (DisplayPort)
Case Lian Li LANCOOL II MESH C
Audio Device(s) On-Board Sound / Sony WH-XB910N Bluetooth Headphones
Power Supply MSI A850GF
Mouse Logitech M705
Keyboard Steelseries
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/liwjs3
Just need the 400 series chipset with all the latest connectivities and this platform is going to be the best budget gaming desktop.
This is another win for AMD. They are delivering very well in budget gaming arena with these APU's.
Yes, to the both of you. I figure that (that is, as long as GPU prices remain in the stratosphere) eventually APUs will be the only way some of us will be able to afford gaming-strength graphics power.
$99. Can it mine? I could see these selling like hot cakes.
Doubt it, there's a reason why discrete graphics cards are the miner's choice; you can stack a whole hell of a lot of them in a confined space. With these APUs, not so much; you need a motherboard and RAM for each APU whereas with GPUs you can shove a lot of cards into one motherboard.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,158 (4.07/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
The IGP performance looks pretty good, it's a good upgrade from the 8 CUs of previous APUs (plus GPU and RAM frequency are higher), but I would have expected the 2200 to have 8 instead of 6 CUs.
Yes, to the both of you. I figure that (that is, as long as GPU prices remain in the stratosphere) eventually APUs will be the only way some of us will be able to afford gaming-strength graphics power.

Has this thing (the IGP) been benchmarked and I missed it?
 
Joined
Feb 12, 2015
Messages
1,104 (0.33/day)
This doesn't look impressive at all, it looks very underwhelming.

It's all relative buddy. It's a 15w part running games just 1 tier below the 100w XBOX One, and it's not even the full die. Those video's tested the weaker Ryzen Mobile APU.

Add 20% (at least) to their results, and that's the true potential of a tiny 15w cpu. Now scale that up to a 100w desktop APU, and you should have something comparable to a console in a $170 APU!
 
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Messages
1,129 (0.21/day)
Location
Republic of Texas
System Name [H]arbringer
Processor 4x 61XX ES @3.5Ghz (48cores)
Motherboard SM GL
Cooling 3x xspc rx360, rx240, 4x DT G34 snipers, D5 pump.
Memory 16x gskill DDR3 1600 cas6 2gb
Video Card(s) blah bigadv folder no gfx needed
Storage 32GB Sammy SSD
Display(s) headless
Case Xigmatek Elysium (whats left of it)
Audio Device(s) yawn
Power Supply Antec 1200w HCP
Software Ubuntu 10.10
Benchmark Scores http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1780855 http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2158678 http://ww
It's all relative buddy. It's a 15w part running games just 1 tier below the 100w XBOX One, and it's not even the full die. Those video's tested the weaker Ryzen Mobile APU.

Add 20% (at least) to their results, and that's the true potential of a tiny 15w cpu. Now scale that up to a 100w desktop APU, and you should have something comparable to a console in a $170 APU!

Shared gddr5 and many many more 2560sp vs 704... This will be below the original xbox one and get stomped by the xbox one x
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
25,559 (6.52/day)
This will be below the original xbox one and get stomped by the xbox one x
That seems like an assumption. The proof is in the pudding and there have been few, if any, mainstream benchmarking tests run yet. But even when there are, how do you benchmark an Xbox? Show a verifiable benchmark score on ANY Xbox game and make the comparison to the same game for PC and your comment may have some creditably. Til then, it's all just subjective, perspective posturing.
 
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
7,762 (3.08/day)
Location
Back in Norway
System Name Hotbox
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, 110/95/110, PBO +150Mhz, CO -7,-7,-20(x6),
Motherboard ASRock Phantom Gaming B550 ITX/ax
Cooling LOBO + Laing DDC 1T Plus PWM + Corsair XR5 280mm + 2x Arctic P14
Memory 32GB G.Skill FlareX 3200c14 @3800c15
Video Card(s) PowerColor Radeon 6900XT Liquid Devil Ultimate, UC@2250MHz max @~200W
Storage 2TB Adata SX8200 Pro
Display(s) Dell U2711 main, AOC 24P2C secondary
Case SSUPD Meshlicious
Audio Device(s) Optoma Nuforce μDAC 3
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Logitech G603
Keyboard Keychron K3/Cooler Master MasterKeys Pro M w/DSA profile caps
Software Windows 10 Pro
Shared gddr5 and many many more 2560sp vs 704... This will be below the original xbox one and get stomped by the xbox one x
The original Xbox One had 768 shader cores at ~850 MHz. This has 704 cores at ~1250 MHz. The original Xbox One had shared (dual channel) DDR3, plus a small amount of ESRAM. While the ESRAM does somewhat make up for the DDR3's low bandwidth, given its tiny size these APUs will no doubt beat it overall (especially with >3000MT/s DDR4). The One X, on the other hand, with GDDR5, 3x the cores and similar clock speeds, will be another story. But I don't think anyone here is expecting a cheap socketed APU to come close to that. Kaby Lake-G might come close, though.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Messages
1,129 (0.21/day)
Location
Republic of Texas
System Name [H]arbringer
Processor 4x 61XX ES @3.5Ghz (48cores)
Motherboard SM GL
Cooling 3x xspc rx360, rx240, 4x DT G34 snipers, D5 pump.
Memory 16x gskill DDR3 1600 cas6 2gb
Video Card(s) blah bigadv folder no gfx needed
Storage 32GB Sammy SSD
Display(s) headless
Case Xigmatek Elysium (whats left of it)
Audio Device(s) yawn
Power Supply Antec 1200w HCP
Software Ubuntu 10.10
Benchmark Scores http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1780855 http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2158678 http://ww
That seems like an assumption. The proof is in the pudding and there have been few, if any, mainstream benchmarking tests run yet. But even when there are, how do you benchmark an Xbox? Show a verifiable benchmark score on ANY Xbox game and make the comparison to the same game for PC and your comment may have some creditably. Til then, it's all just subjective, perspective posturing.
Seriously you have never seen the xbox vs ps4 benchmarks and just assume its impossible to benchmark them? I don't think I am the one needing credibility here lol.

XBOX One has a paltry 768-sp's buddy, and this APU is clocked 50% faster. Furthermore XB1 still uses GCN 1.0 with at least 20-30% lower IPC.
that is the sp count on the xbox one x not xbox one...but even the paltry 768 sp is more than this new apu...
An Up-to clock means little till we see if it can hold that 1250mhz clock or not, vega is not exactly known for running at advertised clocks.

GCN1.0 based not GCN1.0 ... they fattened the caches and heavily tuned it... so you can throw that wild ipc number out... along with the clock.
Besides the point the xbox one x isn't GCN 1.0 based at all... and the shared gddr5 will make this poor apu a smear on the wall.

The original Xbox One had 768 shader cores at ~850 MHz. This has 704 cores at ~1250 MHz. The original Xbox One had shared (dual channel) DDR3, plus a small amount of ESRAM. While the ESRAM does somewhat make up for the DDR3's low bandwidth, given its tiny size these APUs will no doubt beat it overall (especially with >3000MT/s DDR4). The One X, on the other hand, with GDDR5, 3x the cores and similar clock speeds, will be another story. But I don't think anyone here is expecting a cheap socketed APU to come close to that. Kaby Lake-G might come close, though.

No shit... I clearly quoted the specs for the xbox one x. You should also use the S specs not the original anyways.... That said history tells us (and we have console benchmarks now) due to console optimizations you can't just equal a console on paper to beat it. I will be surprised if the apu has a solid 1250 clock and that isn't the up-to number. That along with optimizations is the main reason why I don't think this will outperform the original, let alone the ps4/pro which have proper memory bandwidth from the start.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
25,559 (6.52/day)
Seriously you have never seen the xbox vs ps4 benchmarks and just assume its impossible to benchmark them? I don't think I am the one needing credibility here lol.


that is the sp count on the xbox one x not xbox one...but even the paltry 768 sp is more than this new apu...
An Up-to clock means little till we see if it can hold that 1250mhz clock or not, vega is not exactly known for running at advertised clocks.

GCN1.0 based not GCN1.0 ... they fattened the caches and heavily tuned it... so you can throw that wild ipc number out... along with the clock.
Besides the point the xbox one x isn't GCN 1.0 based at all... and the shared gddr5 will make this poor apu a smear on the wall.



No shit... I clearly quoted the specs for the xbox one x. You should also use the S specs not the original anyways.... That said history tells us (and we have console benchmarks now) due to console optimizations you can't just equal a console on paper to beat it. I will be surprised if the apu has a solid 1250 clock and that isn't the up-to number. That along with optimizations is the main reason why I don't think this will outperform the original, let alone the ps4/pro which have proper memory bandwidth from the start.
Citation please. Being a PS4Pro owner, I'd LOVE to see some actual utility based benchmarks. Sure there's a ton of spec comparison charts, but that does NOT equate to actual benchmark testing. Without such, you are making assumptions and blowing wind..
 
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Messages
1,129 (0.21/day)
Location
Republic of Texas
System Name [H]arbringer
Processor 4x 61XX ES @3.5Ghz (48cores)
Motherboard SM GL
Cooling 3x xspc rx360, rx240, 4x DT G34 snipers, D5 pump.
Memory 16x gskill DDR3 1600 cas6 2gb
Video Card(s) blah bigadv folder no gfx needed
Storage 32GB Sammy SSD
Display(s) headless
Case Xigmatek Elysium (whats left of it)
Audio Device(s) yawn
Power Supply Antec 1200w HCP
Software Ubuntu 10.10
Benchmark Scores http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1780855 http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2158678 http://ww
Citation please. Being a PS4Pro owner, I'd LOVE to see some actual utility based benchmarks. Sure there's a ton of spec comparison charts, but that does NOT equate to actual benchmark testing. Without such, you are making assumptions and blowing wind..

There is no utility it requires hardware.

It's a pain in the ass because you have to use an external capture card to do the frame pacing... and most games are frame capped anyways...
It pretty much is just measuring how often they drop below the cap.

xbox orig vs ps4 (surprise ps4 wins)

Now you can apologize since you couldn't even see fit to use a damn search engine before attacking the first time.:kookoo:
 
Top