• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

HANNspree Launches HQ272PQD Monitor: 27" HS-IPS, QHD, Quantum Dot, 60 Hz, 5 ms

Raevenlord

News Editor
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
3,755 (1.18/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name The Ryzening
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard MSI X570 MAG TOMAHAWK
Cooling Lian Li Galahad 360mm AIO
Memory 32 GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3733 (4x 8 GB)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 3070 Ti
Storage Boot: Transcend MTE220S 2TB, Kintson A2000 1TB, Seagate Firewolf Pro 14 TB
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG270UP (1440p 144 Hz IPS)
Case Lian Li O11DX Dynamic White
Audio Device(s) iFi Audio Zen DAC
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ 750 W
Mouse Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Software Windows 10 x64
HANNspree, are pleased to announce that its performance series of monitors is set to offer a new 27 inch solution featuring Quantum Dot technology. The enhanced display of the HQ272PQD is ideal for gamers, designers and multimedia professionals, offering visual excellence and enhanced color accuracy for all graphic content.

In addition to a WQHD resolution and HANNspree's active contrast ratio, the HQ272PQD display is enhanced with unmatched color purity and brilliant visual brights. Thanks to Quantum Dot technology the HQ272PQD display recreates the full color palette that your natural eye can see and appears four times brighter than a standard display. With enhanced blue and yellow colors through the panel, the HQ272PQD has a vastly enhanced display ability with 116% Adobe RGB, 110% NTSC, and 156% HDTV BR.709 color to bring you a more 'what you see is what you get' experience. Quantum Dots are also durable, meaning colors won't fade, and are the most efficient light emitting material on the planet, ensuring a longer life display that is almost 100% energy efficient. Furthermore, the HQ272PQD also features HS-IPS technology for super wide viewing angles to ensure you can enjoy high-quality visuals from almost any direction, and an easy to use settings menu of intuitive pre-set picture modes.





The new HQ272PQD offers extensive connectivity options. Four digital inputs including; 2 x HDMI, a Display Port and a Mini DisplayPort for native WQHD, provide seamless connectivity with your PC and AV equipment. The HQ272PQD also has twin built-in stereo speakers that provide convenient audio for music, videos and games without the hassle and expense of connecting external speakers, while a headphone socket provides the means to plug in a headset for discreet sound when you don't want to disturb others.

This new monitor from HANNspree has a contemporary desktop design with a robust, stylish stand. Alternatively, you can wall mount the HQ272PQD thanks to VESA support.

HQ272PQD - SRP £279.00 / 319 EUR / 309 USD
  • Display: 27.5" LED with HS-IPS technology
  • Resolution: 2560 x 1440 (16:9) QHD (2K)
  • Brightness: 250cd/m2
  • Contrast Ratio (typ.): 1,000:1
  • Active Contrast: 10,000,000:1
  • Viewing Angles: H/V 178°/178°
  • Display Colors: 1.07B Colors, NTSC Color Gamut 110%, Adobe RGB Color Gamut 116%, sRGB Color Gamut 156%
  • Response Time: 5ms
  • Max Refresh Rate @ 2560x1440: 60 Hz
  • Inputs: HDMI 1.4 x 2, DisplayPort, Mini DisplayPort
  • Dimensions (mm): (w) 712 (h) 120 (d) 453
  • Pre-set Picture Modes: PC / Movie / Game / ECO
  • Built-in Stereo Speakers 2 x 2W
  • Tilt: -15-15°
  • VESA Mounting 100 x 100mm
  • 3 Year Warranty

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Might have been interesting at 144Hz, but it isn't, so it ain't.
I don't care about high refresh, but I would have expected a QD monitor to do HDR easily.
 
This isn't a gaming monitor so I understand the choice of 60 Hz.
What I don't understand is the obligation of jumping from 60 Hz straight to 144 Hz :mad: personally I'd be satisfied with an all-purpose 90 Hz, IPS, x1440 monitor.
But it seems that there are prosumers (whatever that means) and gamers (whatever that is) and nothing in between.
I live in a limbo :eek:
 
This isn't a gaming monitor so I understand the choice of 60 Hz.
What I don't understand is the obligation of jumping from 60 Hz straight to 144 Hz :mad: personally I'd be satisfied with an all-purpose 90 Hz, IPS, x1440 monitor.
But it seems that there are prosumers (whatever that means) and gamers (whatever that is) and nothing in between.
I live in a limbo :eek:

Exactly! 75Hz refresh rate and freesync would've made this monitor perfect for me.
 
Yawn. A rebadged Samsung Quantom Dot panel with the same, boring specs and meh blacks.

One thing though, how is a panel 'almost 100% energy efficient'? :roll::roll:
 
Yawn. A rebadged Samsung Quantom Dot panel with the same, boring specs and meh blacks.

One thing though, how is a panel 'almost 100% energy efficient'? :roll::roll:

Because quantum dots are magical..?
 
Because quantum dots are magical..?
Is it actual, per pixel quantum dots or just a boring backlight?

Based on the contrast ratio, I'd guess a "quantum dot backlight," which grants a wider gamut at least.

EDIT: rats, I was too slow on the edit :p
 
Is it actual, per pixel quantum dots or just a boring backlight?

Based on the contrast ratio, I'd guess a "quantum dot backlight," which may as well be useless, especially if there isn't wider gamut coverage coming with it.
It has a wider gamut. But it still tops out at 250nits and 1000:1 static contrast. Boooring.
 
This isn't a gaming monitor so I understand the choice of 60 Hz.
What I don't understand is the obligation of jumping from 60 Hz straight to 144 Hz :mad: personally I'd be satisfied with an all-purpose 90 Hz, IPS, x1440 monitor.
But it seems that there are prosumers (whatever that means) and gamers (whatever that is) and nothing in between.
I live in a limbo :eek:

higher refresh rates are not just for gamers, Carmack demonstrated on quake con some years back 2 monitors, 1 running 60hz and 1 running 120hz with no game on it at all, just to let people interact with Windows and see how much nicer and smoother 120hz is for everyone.

Linus has also said many times that the Razer phone (120hz screen) and the Asus ROG phone (90hz) are so nice and smooth to work with.

60hz was just a rediculously low ball and should be dated by now standard.
75hz should be the lowest standard it not 100hz.
 
This isn't a gaming monitor so I understand the choice of 60 Hz.
What I don't understand is the obligation of jumping from 60 Hz straight to 144 Hz :mad: personally I'd be satisfied with an all-purpose 90 Hz, IPS, x1440 monitor.
But it seems that there are prosumers (whatever that means) and gamers (whatever that is) and nothing in between.
I live in a limbo :eek:

Why would you have another step at 90 hz when 120-144 is readily available? Its not like it warrants a huge price difference, all high(er) refresh IPS are pricy. These panels need additional hardware (things like overdrive to suppress slower G2G on IPS) if they go beyond 60 anyway. And in most cases also use a different panel altogether. Panels that are fast enough to hit 120-144.

I would much rather see high refresh become a standard like 60hz is today, and a great point to settle on would be 120hz. A perfect double which means stuff like adaptive Vsync still 'fits' into a nice 60hz refresh which would keep the frame pacing even, and is also a perfect 5X of 24 FPS which is nice for native 24hz content.
 
Last edited:
I've had a Hannspree HF257HP, 25" LCD about ten years ago...it was a decent screen, with some unfortunate yellow glow...not sure if it was from nicotine from my cigarettes that got inside the screen, or something wrong with screen.
 
Why would you have another step at 90 hz when 120-144 is readily available? Its not like it warrants a huge price difference, all high(er) refresh IPS are pricy. These panels need additional hardware (things like overdrive to suppress slower G2G on IPS) if they go beyond 60 anyway. And in most cases also use a different panel altogether. Panels that are fast enough to hit 120-144.

I would much rather see high refresh become a standard like 60hz is today, and a great point to settle on would be 120hz. A perfect double which means stuff like adaptive Vsync still 'fits' into a nice 60hz refresh which would keep the frame pacing even, and is also a perfect 5X of 24 FPS which is nice for native 24hz content.
Eh, IPS needs overdrive to hit 60Hz. Fast panels are usually TN-Film and those are unsuitable for any kind of color-critical work. 120Hz IPS is pretty new afaik.
 
Anyone knows anything about difference on hs-ips? What is it? I can't find any proper info about this type of matrix. Some non-marketing characteristics is what i'm looking for, technical comparison against ips, tn and va.
 
Anyone knows anything about difference on hs-ips? What is it? I can't find any proper info about this type of matrix. Some non-marketing characteristics is what i'm looking for, technical comparison against ips, tn and va.

I don't, but wiki should have the answer...basically if you want speedy screen, you go for TN, if you want colours, go IPS, and if you want good black and contrast, go VA. I personally prefer amva+ matrix, as they are the most advanced va screens, almost as fast as ips, but you usually get a decent screen without lamp leakage like you usually get with ips and tn.
 
Yawn. A rebadged Samsung Quantom Dot panel with the same, boring specs and meh blacks.

One thing though, how is a panel 'almost 100% energy efficient'? :roll::roll:

it comes with an exercise bike which provides electricity as long as you push the pedals
 
Back
Top