• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Radeon VII Retested With Latest Drivers

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
28,961 (3.75/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
Just two weeks ago, AMD released their Radeon VII flagship graphics card. It is based on the new Vega 20 GPU, which is the world's first graphics processor built using a 7 nanometer production process. Priced at $699, the new card offers performance levels 20% higher than Radeon RX Vega 64, which should bring it much closer to NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 2080. In our testing we still saw a 14% performance deficit compared to RTX 2080. For the launch-day reviews AMD provided media outlets with a press driver dated January 22, 2019, which we used for our review.

Since the first reviews went up, people in online communities have been speculating that these were early drivers and that new drivers will significantly boost the performance of Radeon VII, to make up lost ground over RTX 2080. There's also the mythical "fine wine" phenomenon where performance of Radeon GPUs significantly improve over time, incrementally. We've put these theories to the test by retesting Radeon VII using AMD's latest Adrenalin 2019 19.2.2 drivers, using our full suite of graphics card benchmarks.




In the chart below, we show the performance deltas compared to our original review, for each title three resolutions are tested: 1920x1080, 2560x1440, 3840x2160 (in that order).

OrBUEdejIlVnPb2m.jpg


Please do note that these results include performance gained by the washer mod and thermal paste change that we had to do when reassembling of the card. These changes reduced hotspot temperatures by around 10°C, allowing the card to boost a little bit higher. To verify what performance improvements were due to the new driver, and what was due to the thermal changes, we first retested the card using the original press driver (with washer mod and TIM). The result was +0.2% improved performance.

Using the latest 19.2.2 drivers added +0.45% on top of that, for a total improvement of +0.653%. Taking a closer look at the results we can see that two specific titles have seen significant gains due to the new driver version. Assassin's Creed Odyssey, and Battlefield V both achieve several-percent improvements, looks like AMD has worked some magic in those games, to unlock extra performance. The remaining titles see small, but statistically significant gains, suggesting that there are some "global" tweaks that AMD can implement to improve performance across the board, but unsurprisingly, these gains are smaller than title-specific optimizations.

Looking further ahead, it seems plausible that AMD can increase performance of Radeon VII down the road, even though we have doubts that enough optimizations can be discovered to match RTX 2080, maybe if suddenly a lot of developers jump on the DirectX 12 bandwagon (which seems unlikely). It's also a question of resources, AMD can't waste time and money to micro-optimize every single title out there. Rather the company seems to be doing the right thing: invest into optimizations for big, popular titles, like Battlefield V and Assassin's Creed. Given how many new titles are coming out using Unreal Engine 4, and how much AMD is lagging behind in those titles, I'd focus on optimizations for UE4 next.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
So basically, aside from 2 titles, everything is within margin of error.
 
Really, all they should do is focus on optimizing for the major game engines.

I mean over time, there will be more and more refinements as their driver teams discover more and more ways to optimize. Right now, this seems more like a bug fix and stability check update to the drivers more than anything.
 
I still like the card and performance it gives, it's a shame that it's not all it can be tho. Here's hoping some time it will be just where it needs to be :)
 
Since the first reviews went up, people in online communities have been speculating that these were early drivers and that new drivers will significantly boost the performance of Radeon VII, to make up lost ground over RTX 2080.
Can anyone remember the last AMD launch where disappointing performance wasn't expected to be mitigated in upcoming drivers?
There's also the mythical "fine wine" phenomenon where performance of Radeon GPUs significantly improve over time, incrementally.
Which won't go away, despite HardOCP looking at AMD's drivers over time and finding very modest increases, with a few (one) exceptions: https://www.hardocp.com/article/2017/01/30/amd_video_card_driver_performance_review_fine_wine/
 
Taking a closer look at the results we can see that two specific titles have seen significant gains due to the new driver version. Assassin's Creed Odyssey, and Battlefield V both achieve multi-digit improvements, looks like AMD has worked some magic in those games, to unlock extra performance.
Is the graph wrong? 5-6% is not multi-digit.
 
I'd like to test this myself but sadly my Radeon 7 arrived as a Dead on Arrival unit and I had to send it back for a replacement. I suppose I'll get the replacement next week.
 
the mythical "fine wine"

Remind me how 780Ti fared against 290x.
"Mythical" eh?

AMD launch where disappointing performance
Yay, that feeling aspect of AMD products is really something special now, isn't it?

I mean, there should be reasons $139 1050Ti outsells 1.5-2 times faster 570 priced at $99, shouldn't there?
 
I mean, there should be reasons $139 1050Ti outsells 1.5-2 times faster 570 priced at $99, shouldn't there?
Stop harping on that. GTX1050Ti has MSRP of $139, RX570 has MSRP of $169. For most part of the lifetime relative prices have reflected that difference only lately moving to where the prices are now.
 
I mean, there should be reasons $139 1050Ti outsells 1.5-2 times faster 570 priced at $99, shouldn't there?
Yes, because you see nVidia logo pop up more often in Games, on ads etc.
The average user might not even have an FPS counter on, they just look at the "safe" option.
They see nVidia / Intel on system requirements they buy that.
 
relative prices have reflected that differenc
BS. 570 wiped the floor with 1050Ti upfront.

There is the same story of 280/280x vs 960, which was a terrible thing to buy, if one had to buy from green, 970 was there.
But it seems to be hard to accept that hordes of consumers make ill informed GPU purchases, for some reason.
 
BS. 570 wiped the floor with 1050Ti upfront.

There is the same story of 280/280x vs 960, which was a terrible thing to buy, if one had to buy from green, 970 was there.
But it seems to be hard to accept that hordes of consumers make ill informed GPU purchases, for some reason.
Yes, RX570 wipes the floor with GTX1050Ti. They are cards from different segments.
RX570 is the intended competitor of GTX1060 3GB.
GTX1050Ti is the intended competitor of RX560.

Pricing in the lowend and midrage is FUBAR.
 
Isn't it the case - the problem for Amd - that ALL games are tested and optimized for nVidia GPU'S?
 
Isn't it the case - the problem for Amd - that ALL games are tested and optimized for nVidia GPU'S?
Not really. Games are calling DX API, they don't know what's going on below that level. Optimizations are more on the level of "don't try to use that feature extensively, because it will bring the hardware to its knees" or "while you do X, you can also do Y, because the hardware can process that in parallel".
It's on;y when you take those optimizations and try to apply them to all hardware that you can get in trouble. But besides a couple of titles that went overboard with hairworks, I don't recall developers being that dumb.
 
Isn't it the case - the problem for Amd - that ALL games are tested and optimized for nVidia GPU'S?
Many on that list are AMD games. FC5,AC, and a couple more I can’t be arsed to install and confirm.
 
Remind me how 780Ti fared against 290x.
"Mythical" eh?

Remind he how 980 Ti fared against Fury X.
7970 was the last good AMD GPU. It's been 7 years.
AMDs GPU business is in a worse state than ever now. I miss ATi.
Fury X, Vega 64 and now Radeon VII - All cards have been a complete joke.
 
Let try to keep this thread clean of red is bad and green is good or vice versa
I'm simply stating facts. I would wish that AMD GPU's were able to compete.. All their "high-end" solutions have been terrible recently. Leaving this segment for Nvidia.
 
Nope. If I pay for full price on day 1 I expect full performance on day 1.
You mean, when you buy 780Ti, you expect it to be beaten by 960 later on, right?

Remind he how 980 Ti fared against Fury X.
Why the hell not!
You might discover interesting things, if you check how results were changing over time in TP charts.
Fury used to beat 980Ti only at 4k at launch (and even then, barely) at 1440p it was about 10% behind:
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/R9_Fury_X/31.html
perfrel_2560.gif


And were are we now:
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/Radeon_RX_Vega_64/31.html
perfrel_2560_1440.png


From 10% behind to several % ahead. Not bad, is it?

And one more point: FineWine in general refers to graceful aging of AMD cards, especially in contrast with that nVidia does with its customers.
Not about some magic dust coming into play later on or AMD purposefully crippling it at launch (the way certain other company does)
 
I'm simply stating facts. I would wish that AMD GPU's were able to compete.. All their "high-end" solutions have been terrible recently. Leaving this segment for Nvidia.

Everybody has a right to their own opinion but with hardware opinion matters not and facts can be bent to serve once narrative.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top