• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

AMD Launches Ryzen 9 3900 and Ryzen 5 3500X Processors

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,849 (7.39/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
AMD Tuesday expanded its 3rd generation Ryzen desktop processor lineup with two new product additions, the 12-core/24-thread Ryzen 9 3900, and the 6-core/12-thread Ryzen 5 3500X. Both chips are particularly interesting given their naming. The 3900 is a slightly subdued twin of the company's current flagship, the 3900X, with a small amount of clock speed traded off for a huge drop in TDP. This chip ticks at 3.10 GHz with 4.30 GHz boost, compared to 3.80/4.60 GHz frequencies of the 3900X. Its TDP, however, is rated at just 65 W, compared to 105 W of the 3900X. You get 512 KB of dedicated L2 cache per core, and 64 MB of L3 cache.

The Ryzen 5 3500X is another interesting part, in which the "X" makes a world of difference from the Ryzen 5 3500. Whilst the 3500 is a 6-core/6-thread part devoid of SMT, the 3500X is 6-core/12-thread (features SMT), has the same exact 3.60 GHz nominal clocks as the popular Ryzen 5 3600, but a slightly lower 4.10 GHz boost frequency, compared to 4.20 GHz of the 3600. The Ryzen 5 3500X is expected to be marginally cheaper than the 3600, at around $189, and is currently only being offered to OEMs and system integrators in China. The company hasn't finalized pricing for the 3900, yet.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
The 3900 is apparently OEM only, for now at least.
fdsv.png

 
3500X: "What is my purpose?"
3600: "You pass butter."
 
3900 holds a lot of appeal as a high core, low wattage monster

irrelevant to many, but the kind of thing a home server needs
 
I suppose you could always down clock a 3900X or limit voltages etc... But then I suppose you would have to find one first as well....?? :(

AMD we need more of your CPUs!!
 
3900 OEM for now, 5500 OEM for now. I guess AMD is already having problems with TSMC's manufacturing constrains, so it gives priority where it should give. To OEMs. I wonder if we will see a 3950 also.
 
3500X: "What is my purpose?"
3600: "You pass butter."

So thats what Rick used for it's CPU......

The 3900 looks like an interesting chip and it's nice to see a low wattage variant in the lineup.
 
Only 7 months to go and 4000 series cpu's will be launching! I decided to wait for that, no doubt in my mind they will launch in July or August next year. At this point I might as well wait
 
Only 7 months to go and 4000 series cpu's will be launching! I decided to wait for that, no doubt in my mind they will launch in July or August next year. At this point I might as well wait
You should keep an eye on TSMC's problems with manufacturing capacity or you could end up buying a more expensive 3000 series in 7 months compare with it's pricing today.
 
You should keep an eye on TSMC's problems with manufacturing capacity or you could end up buying a more expensive 3000 series in 7 months compare with it's pricing today.

If that is the case I will just wait another 14 or 30 months. My gtx 1070 laptop handles everything just fine for now. also I have enough backlog to last me a decade as it is. I am in no rush.
 
If that is the case I will just wait another 14 or 30 months. My gtx 1070 laptop handles everything just fine for now. also I have enough backlog to last me a decade as it is. I am in no rush.
I went from 2500K to 3800X this month. I would have taken 3900X but it was impossible to find. Now that i have 3800X then 3900X is in stock and in store for weeks. Just my luck. I will upgrade to 4900X or 4950X next year as it will be likely the last AM4 compatible CPU. Unless they will do cross socket compatibility for 5000 series and up (you never know with a massive AM4 install base). Ofcourse some features will be unavailable on AM4 and only DDR4 can be used but i don't think that's a bad thing.
 
You should keep an eye on TSMC's problems with manufacturing capacity or you could end up buying a more expensive 3000 series in 7 months compare with it's pricing today.

Amd's manufacturing node is almost 100% exclusive to AMD so they do not share manufacturing line with Apple, Kirin, Qualcomm etc.
 
umm every other major site has 3500x pegged as 6 core/6 threads?
So can someone clarify, or is TPU the only one right?
 
Toms said this, not sure how true it is:

Regrettably, the new six-core chip will not be available outside of the Chinese OEM market.

EDIT: seeing this mentioned in a few places. They also mention it being 6C/6T.
 
Ali Express has 3500X already for sale for $160. And a youtuber already tested it vs 9400F.
I can see why there is no need for AMD to sell it worldwide since 2600X is on sale for $130 and 3600 for $190. It would stop most gamers from getting the 3600. In China though, most people cannot afford 3600 and would get the 9400F if 3500X didn't exist. And China is by far the biggest PC market for budget gamers. Smart move from a financial and marketing aspect for AMD imho.
 
Back
Top