• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Crytek Releases Hardware-Agnostic Raytracing Benchmark "Neon Noir"

RTX2080
RT Ultra:
- 1080p: 10071
- 1440p: 6495 (6803 with a small OC)
RT Very High:
- 1080p: 11959
- 1440p: 7818

Very high has obviously lower resolution, both have temporal artifacts (more noticeable at RT Very High).
What I assume is a cutoff point from RT to voxels seems to be closer at Very High as well.
 
Last edited:
Then why you guys were complaining about Vega prices. HBM was not cheap and was more expensive than TU104 die.
Probably because Vega didn't offer a unique feature in return? (And no, HBM is not a feature.)
 
RTX 2060 with a 75 MHz bump over the MSI factory overclock, and 875 MHz+ for the GDDR6
Same clock speed for the GPU/GDDR6 at 1440P

Ultra
1440P: 4781
1080P: 7853
Untitled.jpg

Nothing seems off with the bullet shell casings rasterized rendering or RTRT. Maybe it shows up at the Very High setting?
 
Last edited:
CRYTEK needs only to release a refresh of CRYSIS.

NANOSUIT vs. North Korea.

Take the stupid aliens out of it and make the game solely about a government issued supersoldier team going up against a bunch of technologically inferior North Koreans.

Melt my computer if you can.
 

Attachments

  • 6932790662_a498a8697e_b.jpg
    6932790662_a498a8697e_b.jpg
    161.9 KB · Views: 317
With Unigine and Unreal engine gobbling up the dev market Crytek is desprately looking for ways to attract game developers:

"Hey look at us! We got Ray Tracing on DX11! Buy our engine PLEASE!"
 
i7 4790@4GHz, GTX980@1400MHz, ----> score 4434 (1080p ultra fullscreen). so old computer doing very well. i'm waiting for first games for ps5 with RT.
 
trash.jpg


- 1080p
- Ultra

Disappointing........ :wtf:
 
I wouldn't call the score disappointing.

Well I figured this benchmark was all about GPU horsepower, no RTX involved but it seems your RTX 2060 is edging out my RX 5700 XT which gives me the impression that those RT/tensor cores are kicking in? Idk but I was just expecting a bit more but then again this benchmark is new, don't really have a reference point of performance yet. :toast:
 
The benchmark seems to run without the additional launcher.
That's good then. You still have to use the launcher to get it in the first place though.
 
Well I figured this benchmark was all about GPU horsepower, no RTX involved but it seems your RTX 2060 is edging out my RX 5700 XT which gives me the impression that those RT/tensor cores are kicking in?
It most likely is the Turing architecture than a hardware assist from RTX hardware on the die. Crytek is suppose to patch in DXR hardware support at a later time.

However, the developer has added that they will add hardware acceleration support in the future, which should only improve performance,
 
Last edited:
@T4C Fantasy what you say buddy? pal? comrade?
I think he checked out on doing benchmark threads. I haven't seen any activity on the prior threads.
 
On 2080Ti oced I get:
RT Ultra
1080p : 15400
1440p : 9900
162fps avg and 122fps 1% low at 1080P ultra.

 
Last edited:
This is with a bios modded 5700 on water. No idea if this score means anything.
This was 1440P with Ultra Raytracing.


test.PNG
 
Well I figured this benchmark was all about GPU horsepower, no RTX involved but it seems your RTX 2060 is edging out my RX 5700 XT which gives me the impression that those RT/tensor cores are kicking in? Idk but I was just expecting a bit more but then again this benchmark is new, don't really have a reference point of performance yet. :toast:

so far this the only comparison i can find on youtube. maybe we will see more in a few days:

 
Seems like the reflections when using AMD gpu is less detailed and has some rendering errors there


with Nvidia


Wccftech clip

My Clip with 2080Ti
 
Seems like the reflections when using AMD gpu is less detailed and has some rendering errors there


with Nvidia


Wccftech clip

My Clip with 2080Ti
It's been reported before (and acknowledged by devs) that in the absence of hardware acceleration, this implementation cuts many corners.
It may not be that big of a deal if you won't notice the difference in motion.
 
It's been reported before (and acknowledged by devs) that in the absence of hardware acceleration, this implementation cuts many corners.
It may not be that big of a deal if you won't notice the difference in motion.

Kinda defeat the purpose of vendor agnostic ray tracing when one vendor can render ray traced images better than the other ain't it :D. Also could you kindly point me to where the developers admit they were cutting corners ?
Also the torchlight reflections from the drone with AMD is quite jarring.
 
Last edited:

2070 super is getting about 40% higher framerate than 5700XT,and that's a hardware-agnostic benchmark that's no using any of turing's additional RT-specific cores.
Radeon VII loses to 5700XT by 10% despite being 10% faster otherwise.
GTX 1080 is 11% faster than Vega 64.
 
If anyone is curious here is a video showing 3800x paired with rx580 nitro+, 1080p ultra settings:

I just recorded this video and finished uploading, right after i finished uploading i see new driver got released... Well, i assume it wouldn't make much of a difference in this particular case.
 
Hah I read this elsewhere and missed the news post here... made a topic for results

My first, bumpy run was 7085 pts @ 1080p/Ultra. Very good FPS, frame time consistency not so much.

 
Back
Top