- Joined
- Mar 6, 2017
- Messages
- 3,414 (1.12/day)
- Location
- North East Ohio, USA
System Name | My Ryzen 7 7700X Super Computer |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 7700X |
Motherboard | Gigabyte B650 Aorus Elite AX |
Cooling | DeepCool AK620 with Arctic Silver 5 |
Memory | 2x16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 NEO DDR5 EXPO (CL30) |
Video Card(s) | XFX AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE |
Storage | Samsung 980 EVO 1 TB NVMe SSD (System Drive), Samsung 970 EVO 500 GB NVMe SSD (Game Drive) |
Display(s) | Acer Nitro XV272U (DisplayPort) and Acer Nitro XV270U (DisplayPort) |
Case | Lian Li LANCOOL II MESH C |
Audio Device(s) | On-Board Sound / Sony WH-XB910N Bluetooth Headphones |
Power Supply | MSI A850GF |
Mouse | Logitech M705 |
Keyboard | Steelseries |
Software | Windows 11 Pro 64-bit |
Benchmark Scores | https://valid.x86.fr/liwjs3 |
That may be so for architectures such as Intel's Core architecture because it's an older architecture, that's not so with AMD's Zen architecture. It's a new architecture, less than four years old so there's some more gas in the tank whereas with Intel's Core architecture all of the low-hanging fruit has been picked already. AMD's finding ways to tweak caches, branch prediction, and all sorts of things but that's to be expected with a new architecture such as the Zen architecture.It's awfully difficult to squeek out better IPC from today's designs. I have a tough time believing an additional 17% improvement on IPC and clock increase combined. On multicore I can easily see 17% on better SMT or triple SMT etc.