• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Radeon Pro 5600M with HBM2 Benchmarked

You know, doing things at point scale is a driver choice which OGSSAA is akin to. You might enjoy the greater textural quality, however the method is not without its disclaimer: ordered sampling introduces its grid pattern into the sampling distribution. So, it skews the sampling distribution rather than filtering it. RGSSAA provides more(root^2) multisample antialiasing at xy axis, in relation to diagonal antialiasing(-root^2).
All things said, it is not without cause; antialiasing is for filtering, not sampling aliases.
So, these aren't just preferential differences why the fraction is not set to be divisible.
As usual, your posts are needlessly technical gibberish that generally don't relate to the topic. "point scale"? "textural quality"? "sampling distribution"? I'm talking about being able to compare two things with the same metric. For gaming performance, that generally means the same game, at the same resolution, at the same settings, with the same driver and as few background applications as possible. What you are talking about has no relevance to this whatsoever.
 
As usual, your posts are needlessly technical gibberish that generally don't relate to the topic. "point scale"? "textural quality"? "sampling distribution"? I'm talking about being able to compare two things with the same metric. For gaming performance, that generally means the same game, at the same resolution, at the same settings, with the same driver and as few background applications as possible. What you are talking about has no relevance to this whatsoever.
The game designers cannot introduce repeating patterns just some random npc found necessary, alright?
 
one would think the editor should mention that
actually They did HERE:

"With 2,560 RDNA stream processors, you'd expect more performance, ****but this card was designed to meet stringent power limits of 50 W, **** and has significantly lower clock-speeds than "Navi 10" based Radeon Pro graphics cards (1035 MHz max boost engine clock vs. 1930 MHz and 205 W TDP of the Pro W5700). Find more interesting commentary in the Max Tech video presentation."

That RX 5600M config is what i wish i had in a NUC-sized computer, for real.
oh yea, Me TOO!!!! ") Just not an apple devce :P
 
Back
Top