• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Apple's Homebrew Mac Processor to Leverage Arm big.LITTLE

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
46,283 (7.69/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
The first homebrew processor for Macs by Apple could leverage Arm big.LITTLE technology, according to a slide from a developer-relations presentation leaked by Erdi Özüağ of Donanim Haber. Apple is referring to the setup as "asymmetric cores" in its documentation, although it essentially is big.LITTLE, a technology that's been implemented by Arm SoC vendors since 2012. It combines groups of low-power (high-efficiency) and high-performance (low-efficiency) cores in response to processing demands by software, with the high-performance cores only been engaged when needed. Intel only recently introduced its rendition of this tech, called Hybrid Processing, with its Core "Lakefield" processor, and looks to scale it up with future chips such as "Meteor Lake."

Besides a multi-core big.LITTLE CPU, the Apple SoC features dedicated AI acceleration hardware, including a neural engine and matrix-multiplication hardware (dubbed ML accelerators), a dedicated video hardware encoder and decoder, and memory controller that's optimized for UMA (unified memory) for the iGPU and system memory. Apple has already started shipping Mac Mini prototypes with an Arm-based processor to its ISVs along with a special version of MacOS "Big Sur" and a wealth of software development kit to help port their x86 Mac software over to the new machine architecture.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
8,863 (3.36/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
I kept saying it but no one wanted to believe it.

The blisteringly fast "Mac SoCs" are just going to be mobile SoCs with higher power envelopes. big.LITTLE architectures serve no purposes in PCs.
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2020
Messages
1,632 (1.12/day)
I kept saying it but no one wanted to believe it.

The blisteringly fast "Mac SoCs" are just going to be mobile SoCs with higher power envelopes. big.LITTLE architectures serve no purposes in PCs.

On desktops, I agree. But on laptops like a Macbook Air, the big/little config can mean a lot in terms of battery life. Especially if it is properly optimized, which is feasible in Apple's ecosystem.

The SOCs may not differ from what they use in say their iPhones/ iPads. But given the larger battery and higher power envelope, you may expect to see more cores.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
6,729 (1.68/day)
Till we've seen a good (enough) implementation you cannot dismiss big.LITTLE just based on <your hypothesis> & certainly don't count Lakefield as any sort of proof of concept :shadedshu:
Intel these days is best at adding ++ to their burgeoning process nodes, everything else they seem to botch pretty hard.
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2018
Messages
961 (0.44/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Motherboard Asus ROG Crosshair VIII Hero WiFi
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420
Memory 32Gb G-Skill Trident Z Neo @3806MHz C14
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX2070
Storage Seagate FireCuda 530 1TB
Display(s) Samsung G9 49" Curved Ultrawide
Case Cooler Master Cosmos
Audio Device(s) O2 USB Headphone AMP
Power Supply Corsair HX850i
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Cherry MX
Software Windows 11
Wow, I could never have guessed that Apple would use this... Jeez people, how can anyone be surprised by this, it's been in Apples architecture for years now, so long that it's old.

And to those saying "what use is this in a PC, it's a waste of time", then you clearly have no idea how modern software works, as well as the fact that these CPUs will mostly be found in battery powered devices.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 20, 2007
Messages
20,714 (3.41/day)
System Name Pioneer
Processor Ryzen R9 7950X
Motherboard GIGABYTE Aorus Elite X670 AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 + A whole lotta Sunon and Corsair Maglev blower fans...
Memory 64GB (4x 16GB) G.Skill Flare X5 @ DDR5-6000 CL30
Video Card(s) XFX RX 7900 XTX Speedster Merc 310
Storage 2x Crucial P5 Plus 2TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSDs
Display(s) 55" LG 55" B9 OLED 4K Display
Case Thermaltake Core X31
Audio Device(s) TOSLINK->Schiit Modi MB->Asgard 2 DAC Amp->AKG Pro K712 Headphones or HDMI->B9 OLED
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti Pro 850W
Mouse Logitech G305 Lightspeed Wireless
Keyboard WASD Code v3 with Cherry Green keyswitches
Software Windows 11 Enterprise (legit), Gentoo Linux x64
I kept saying it but no one wanted to believe it.

The blisteringly fast "Mac SoCs" are just going to be mobile SoCs with higher power envelopes. big.LITTLE architectures serve no purposes in PCs.

Intel disagrees with you.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
8,863 (3.36/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
Intel disagrees with you.

Oh I'm sure they are, doesn't mean the idea is great. What they don't tell you is the real reason why they would want a big.LITTLE architecture in PCs out there : it's cheaper. They'll sell you less transistors, for the same amount of cores. If they'll find a way to sell an 8 core CPU with half the cores being a 4th of the size of the other half, they'll have a winner, not for the consumer mind you but their pockets. We'll see how it goes, people wouldn't shut up about AMD and FX cores and how they were scamming people I wonder what they'll say about this.
 
Last edited:
Top