• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Et tu, Samsung? Samsung Too Changes Components for their 970 EVO Plus SSD

Raevenlord

News Editor
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
3,755 (1.35/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name The Ryzening
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard MSI X570 MAG TOMAHAWK
Cooling Lian Li Galahad 360mm AIO
Memory 32 GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3733 (4x 8 GB)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 3070 Ti
Storage Boot: Transcend MTE220S 2TB, Kintson A2000 1TB, Seagate Firewolf Pro 14 TB
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG270UP (1440p 144 Hz IPS)
Case Lian Li O11DX Dynamic White
Audio Device(s) iFi Audio Zen DAC
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ 750 W
Mouse Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Software Windows 10 x64
A number of manufacturers have been caught red-handed, so to speak, by changing components on their SSD products without as much as a product specifications change. This has happened in the past with ADATA, Patriot, and more recently with Western Digital and its WD Blue SN550; now, it's Samsung that's being on the receiving end of a more attentive look at their recent batches of the 970 EVO SSD - particularly its 1 TB configuration.

According to Computerbase, a YouTube channel in Asia seems to have first noticed the difference. They've tested the older version of Samsung's 970 Evo Plus 1 TB (product number MZVLB1T0HBLR, April 2021 production date, a Phoenix controller [S4LR020] and 96-layer 3D TLC NAND) against the newer (product number MZVL21T0HBLU and is equipped with an Elpis controller [S4LV003] and 3D-NAND with the identifier K9DUGY8J5B-CCK0), which likely features different packaging and density for the same 96-layer 3D TLC NAND.





It seems that the new version of the SSD is faster in workloads up to 115 GB - the size of its revised SLC cache, meant to absorb burst of write activity at faster speeds than the remainder NAND working in TLC mode. The original SLC cache provision stood at 42 GB, which is what the original version shipped with, and whose behavior is confirmed in testing - the original release of the Samsung 970 Evo Plus exhausts its SLC cache (with the appropriate performance drop from overflowing into TLC) at around 40 GB. This performance change is a welcome one, even if it too should be updated on the drives' official specifications. The drive does however deliver lower performance once its SLC cache is exhausted - the original version kept chugging along with data writing speeds of around 1,500 MB/s after the first 40 GB were written, while the new revision drops that performance to 800 MB/s after 115 GB of writes. So users can be faced with either improved performance, or worsened performance, in this same product compared to the original. Check the results in the gallery below, where the original revision is on the left side (BIOS 2B2QEXM7), and the new revision is on the right (3B2QEXM7).



Component changes in electronics are not uncommon themselves; there are a number of products and chips that can employ several alternatives in the supply chain. this has become especially more important a safety mechanism for manufacturers with the still straining electronics supply chains, which are still reeling from Covid-19. However, sometimes changes are enacted not because manufacturers are forced to do it on account of component shortages; sometimes, they do it to save some extra dollars here and there. The problem arises when a products' performance characteristics suffers from the component change, which has been the case, every single time, for these changes in SSD components. The Samsung case is a different one - there are specific performance improvement and degradation according to workload.

Samsung differs in its peers by actually introducing a new serial number - as well as a new BIOS version - for this particular 970 EVO Plus rendition. However, would it be so hard to do this the right way again? Samsung had already done it with their 850 EVO V2 - which clearly demonstrated that two different revisions were available for the same product, with differing specifications listings as well. this is the way to not confuse customers. However, maybe Samsung felt they had no good way of doing this change: the drive isn't clearly better or clearly worse than the original revision it replaces. That said, slightly more information - or a press release from Samsung - could have mitigated these issues. Users should be able to know exactly what their money is purchasing. Check the original video below.


View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 

GabrielLP14

SSD DB Maintainer
Staff member
Joined
Aug 2, 2021
Messages
246 (0.25/day)
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
System Name Gabriel-PC
Processor Core i7-13700K (All Core 5.7GHz)
Motherboard MSI Z790-P PRO WIFI DDR4
Cooling NZXT Kraken X72 360mm
Memory Netac DDR4-3200 MT/s CL-16
Video Card(s) RTX 4060 Galax 1-Click
Storage Solidigm P44 Pro 2TB (OS), SK Hynix P41 1TB (Games) + 4x 4TB WD Black HD (Synology NAS DS1817)
Display(s) AOC G2460PF 144Hz 1ms (Kinda trash)
Case NZXT Phantom 820 Black
Audio Device(s) Motherboard onboard audio (good enough for me)
Power Supply Corsair RM1000X
Mouse Have no idea (Generic)
Keyboard Have no idea (Generic)
Software Windows 11 Pro 23H2 + Windows Server 2022 + Synology in NAS
It's saying "9700" instead of 970 in the first paragraph, thanks for the head's up with this news
 
Joined
Jan 7, 2020
Messages
20 (0.01/day)
I think that it will actually work faster for most users. writing 115GB in one go is not something that is done often. But copying small files is something that frustrates me on NVME drives since it's not that much faster than SATA ssd's. I have checked, have the old 2TB version but actually wouldn't have minded having the new version.
 

GabrielLP14

SSD DB Maintainer
Staff member
Joined
Aug 2, 2021
Messages
246 (0.25/day)
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
System Name Gabriel-PC
Processor Core i7-13700K (All Core 5.7GHz)
Motherboard MSI Z790-P PRO WIFI DDR4
Cooling NZXT Kraken X72 360mm
Memory Netac DDR4-3200 MT/s CL-16
Video Card(s) RTX 4060 Galax 1-Click
Storage Solidigm P44 Pro 2TB (OS), SK Hynix P41 1TB (Games) + 4x 4TB WD Black HD (Synology NAS DS1817)
Display(s) AOC G2460PF 144Hz 1ms (Kinda trash)
Case NZXT Phantom 820 Black
Audio Device(s) Motherboard onboard audio (good enough for me)
Power Supply Corsair RM1000X
Mouse Have no idea (Generic)
Keyboard Have no idea (Generic)
Software Windows 11 Pro 23H2 + Windows Server 2022 + Synology in NAS
I think that it will actually work faster for most users. writing 115GB in one go is not something that is done often. But copying small files is something that frustrates me on NVME drives since it's not that much faster than SATA ssd's. I have checked, have the old 2TB version but actually wouldn't have minded having the new version.
one think we also need to consider is the time it takes for the pSLC Caching algorithm to recover, if the drive still have some Static portion, it would recover immediatly, however the dynamic portion, could take a while depending on how well the firmware is configured.
Smaller buffers have the advantage of higher sustained speeds in most cases
 

SuMMoN

New Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2021
Messages
4 (0.00/day)
Why you exclude the fact that new revision use the same controller and PCB layout as 980 Pro from the video in this article?
 
Joined
Jun 12, 2017
Messages
184 (0.07/day)
System Name Linotosh
Processor Dual 800mhz G4
Cooling Air
Memory 1.5 GB
I agree they should have changed the product name, but as already stated, this will likely improve performance for most people. It's refreshing to see a change that has potentially positive performance implications considered the recent trend of degrading performance without any mention by the manufacturer that it has changed the specs.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2020
Messages
9,162 (6.11/day)
Location
Louisianna
System Name Ghetto Rigs z490|x99|Acer 17 Nitro 7840hs/ 5600c40-2x16/ 4060/ 1tb acer stock m.2/ 4tb sn850x
Processor 10900k w/Optimus Foundation | 5930k w/Black Noctua D15
Motherboard z490 Maximus XII Apex | x99 Sabertooth
Cooling oCool D5 res-combo/280 GTX/ Optimus Foundation/ gpu water block | Blk D15
Memory Trident-Z Royal 4000c16 2x16gb | Trident-Z 3200c14 4x8gb
Video Card(s) Titan Xp-water | evga 980ti gaming-w/ air
Storage 970evo+500gb & sn850x 4tb | 860 pro 256gb | Acer m.2 1tb/ sn850x 4tb| Many2.5" sata's ssd 3.5hdd's
Display(s) 1-AOC G2460PG 24"G-Sync 144Hz/ 2nd 1-ASUS VG248QE 24"/ 3rd LG 43" series
Case D450 | Cherry Entertainment center on Test bench
Audio Device(s) Built in Realtek x2 with 2-Insignia 2.0 sound bars & 1-LG sound bar
Power Supply EVGA 1000P2 with APC AX1500 | 850P2 with CyberPower-GX1325U
Mouse Redragon 901 Perdition x3
Keyboard G710+x3
Software Win-7 pro x3 and win-10 & 11pro x3
Benchmark Scores Are in the benchmark section
Why you exclude the fact that new revision use the same controller and PCB layout as 980 Pro from the video in this article?
Hi,
980's have had lots of read/. write issues hitting spec's so this might not be a good thing.

Would of been nice to call it 970 evo minus lol
 
Joined
Dec 29, 2020
Messages
159 (0.13/day)
Seems Samsung made the best out of their nand downgrade. However, because of the quite different characteristics, I still think it's pretty bad that they gave it the same name.

Sure, most writes will be faster considering roughly 150gb is the break-even point however, for people who regularly write above that it can be quite significant:
118 vs 147 seconds for 200gb
246 vs 384 at 400gb
roughly 30 seconds slower at 200gb
more than 138 seconds at 400gb
Where the maximum time saving the new drive this way would be just be 18 seconds

These are just my numbers plotted in google sheets, I have skimped over details / possibly contains errors,
In case anyone cares: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1pGIGu38fhuUbchcOKSaccEU7AMIbXHyoOSGqgJevDyw/edit?usp=sharing

Another thing is temperatures, the new drive runs hotter, possibly consumes more power? not something you want in a laptop which is quite a common usecase.

Either way, I think it's generally bad to keep the sku the same with such potential regressions, even if the vast majority of users will only benefit.
Just call it the 975 EVO Plus or if you want to go the intel route the 970 EVO Plus Plus.
I know keeping things in stock and continuity is an issue but a complete redesign warrants a new name at least.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2012
Messages
2,715 (0.61/day)
System Name MSI GP76
Processor intel i7 11800h
Cooling 2 laptop fans
Memory 32gb of 3000mhz DDR4
Video Card(s) Nvidia 3070
Storage x2 PNY 8tb cs2130 m.2 SSD--16tb of space
Display(s) 17.3" IPS 1920x1080 240Hz
Power Supply 280w laptop power supply
Mouse Logitech m705
Keyboard laptop keyboard
Software lots of movies and Windows 10 with win 7 shell
Benchmark Scores Good enough for me
Seems Samsung made the best out of their nand downgrade. However, because of the quite different characteristics, I still think it's pretty bad that they gave it the same name.

Sure, most writes will be faster considering roughly 150gb is the break-even point however, for people who regularly write above that it can be quite significant:
118 vs 147 seconds for 200gb
246 vs 384 at 400gb
roughly 30 seconds slower at 200gb
more than 138 seconds at 400gb
Where the maximum time saving the new drive this way would be just be 18 seconds

These are just my numbers plotted in google sheets, I have skimped over details / possibly contains errors,
In case anyone cares: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1pGIGu38fhuUbchcOKSaccEU7AMIbXHyoOSGqgJevDyw/edit?usp=sharing

Another thing is temperatures, the new drive runs hotter, possibly consumes more power? not something you want in a laptop which is quite a common usecase.

Either way, I think it's generally bad to keep the sku the same with such potential regressions, even if the vast majority of users will only benefit.
Just call it the 975 EVO Plus or if you want to go the intel route the 970 EVO Plus Plus.
I know keeping things in stock and continuity is an issue but a complete redesign warrants a new name at least.
You have any proof of using higher power.
 
Joined
Dec 29, 2020
Messages
159 (0.13/day)
You have any proof of using higher power.
Sorry, I do not, I just watched the original video showcasing higher thermals. While certainly not confirmed, I would figure similar heat-dissipation from the surface, thus it would make a lot of sense if the power consumption under load would be higher.

But indeed I do not have any proof.
 
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
543 (0.14/day)
And when people keep buying these things up, it'll teach these companies that not only can they charge more for the same products, they can also notably make them worse.

No one will care enough to stop buying. The pandemic/tariffs lessons these companies are being taught are going to have massive implications going forward to how businesses treat consumers.
 
Joined
Jan 5, 2006
Messages
17,693 (2.66/day)
System Name AlderLake / Laptop
Processor Intel i7 12700K P-Cores @ 5Ghz / Intel i3 7100U
Motherboard Gigabyte Z690 Aorus Master / HP 83A3 (U3E1)
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A 2 fans + Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme + 5 case fans / Fan
Memory 32GB DDR5 Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 6000MHz CL36 / 8GB DDR4 HyperX CL13
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio / Intel HD620
Storage Samsung 980 Pro 1TB + 970 Evo 500GB + 850 Pro 512GB + 860 Evo 1TB x2 / Samsung 256GB M.2 SSD
Display(s) 23.8" Dell S2417DG 165Hz G-Sync 1440p / 14" 1080p IPS Glossy
Case Be quiet! Silent Base 600 - Window / HP Pavilion
Audio Device(s) Panasonic SA-PMX94 / Realtek onboard + B&O speaker system / Harman Kardon Go + Play / Logitech G533
Power Supply Seasonic Focus Plus Gold 750W / Powerbrick
Mouse Logitech MX Anywhere 2 Laser wireless / Logitech M330 wireless
Keyboard RAPOO E9270P Black 5GHz wireless / HP backlit
Software Windows 11 / Windows 10
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R23 (Single Core) 1936 @ stock Cinebench R23 (Multi Core) 23006 @ stock
A number of manufacturers have been caught red-handed, so to speak, by changing components on their SSD products without as much as a product specifications change.
Maybe reasons for W1zzard to review these SSD's with changed components again?
 
Joined
Jun 18, 2021
Messages
2,252 (2.22/day)
And when people keep buying these things up, it'll teach these companies that not only can they charge more for the same products, they can also notably make them worse.

The problem has nothing to with charging more for the same or worse product. They could charge whatever they want for the new revision as long as they announce it, so people will now it's a different product that might have different specs. Most people will think that it might be better but then, since it's a new product, reviewers can validate if it is or isn't better instead of having to ramdonly find out that under the cooling sticker the product changed!
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,163 (4.07/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Do we have a trend here? "Give them more SLC cache, so they won't notice the flash is actually slower"?
 
Joined
Jun 18, 2021
Messages
2,252 (2.22/day)
Do we have a trend here? "Give them more SLC cache, so they won't notice the flash is actually slower"?

for regular office work I don't think it's such a bad idea, but clearly market it as such. More intense workloads will suffer and this isn't even a low tier device where we could try to excuse a more varied performance (we shouldn't excuse it either way but anyway)
 
Joined
Sep 5, 2004
Messages
1,956 (0.27/day)
Location
The Kingdom of Norway
Processor Ryzen 5900X
Motherboard Gigabyte B550I AORUS PRO AX 1.1
Cooling Noctua NB-U12A
Memory 2x 32GB Fury DDR4 3200mhz
Video Card(s) PowerColor Radeon 5700 XT Red Dragon
Storage Kingston FURY Renegade 2TB PCIe 4.0
Display(s) 2x Dell U2412M
Case Phanteks P400A
Audio Device(s) Hifimediy Sabre 9018 USB DAC
Power Supply Corsair AX850 (from 2012)
Software Windows 10?
heh hopefully people will sue them for false marketing
 
Joined
May 3, 2018
Messages
2,234 (1.04/day)
Yet again undocumented changes not telling people of how performance will change, so they can decide for themselves if this is worthwhile to them. Have they slashed the price?

So glad I got my 2TB model early in the year.
 
Joined
Feb 15, 2019
Messages
1,525 (0.82/day)
System Name Personal Gaming Rig
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI X670E Carbon
Cooling MO-RA 3 420
Memory 32GB 6000MHz
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 ICHILL FROSTBITE ULTRA
Storage 4x 2TB Nvme
Display(s) Samsung G8 OLED
Case Silverstone FT04
So it is a 980Pro with PCI-E 4.0 disabled ?
 

Mussels

Freshwater Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
58,413 (8.21/day)
Location
Oystralia
System Name Rainbow Sparkles (Power efficient, <350W gaming load)
Processor Ryzen R7 5800x3D (Undervolted, 4.45GHz all core)
Motherboard Asus x570-F (BIOS Modded)
Cooling Alphacool Apex UV - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora + EK Quantum ARGB 3090 w/ active backplate
Memory 2x32GB DDR4 3600 Corsair Vengeance RGB @3866 C18-22-22-22-42 TRFC704 (1.4V Hynix MJR - SoC 1.15V)
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 3090 SG 24GB: Underclocked to 1700Mhz 0.750v (375W down to 250W))
Storage 2TB WD SN850 NVME + 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 1TB Intel 6000P NVME USB 3.2
Display(s) Phillips 32 32M1N5800A (4k144), LG 32" (4K60) | Gigabyte G32QC (2k165) | Phillips 328m6fjrmb (2K144)
Case Fractal Design R6
Audio Device(s) Logitech G560 | Corsair Void pro RGB |Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply Fractal Ion+ 2 860W (Platinum) (This thing is God-tier. Silent and TINY)
Mouse Logitech G Pro wireless + Steelseries Prisma XL
Keyboard Razer Huntsman TE ( Sexy white keycaps)
VR HMD Oculus Rift S + Quest 2
Software Windows 11 pro x64 (Yes, it's genuinely a good OS) OpenRGB - ditch the branded bloatware!
Benchmark Scores Nyooom.
Really should have been a V2, with the drive being slightly better for most use cases and worse in rare cases, most users would not have card or notice... but sales and interest in the new and improved V2 would have been good marketing vs this shite
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,163 (4.07/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
heh hopefully people will sue them for false marketing
There's no case here, marketing is smart enough not to advertise the NAND itself ;)
 
Joined
Apr 11, 2021
Messages
214 (0.20/day)
So it is a 980Pro with PCI-E 4.0 disabled ?
They also come with different NANDs, 96L vs 136L.

On the new model itself, I can try to understand why they don't want to make it a V2, but they should have made a short press release to announce the change.
 
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Messages
533 (0.13/day)
Location
Bulgaria
System Name Black Knight | White Queen
Processor Intel Core i9-10940X | Intel Core i7-5775C
Motherboard ASUS ROG Rampage VI Extreme Encore X299G | ASUS Sabertooth Z97 Mark S (White)
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 chromax.black | Xigmatek Dark Knight SD-1283 Night Hawk (White)
Memory G.SKILL Trident Z RGB 4x8GB DDR4 3600MHz CL16 | Corsair Vengeance LP 4x4GB DDR3L 1600MHz CL9 (White)
Video Card(s) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4090 OC | KFA2/Galax GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Hall of Fame Edition
Storage Samsung 990 Pro 2TB, 980 Pro 1TB, 850 Pro 256GB, 840 Pro 256GB, WD 10TB+ (incl. VelociRaptors)
Display(s) Dell Alienware AW2721D 240Hz, ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q 170Hz, ASUS PA246Q 60Hz| Samsung JU7500 48'' TV
Case Corsair 7000D AIRFLOW (Black) | NZXT ??? w/ ASUS DRW-24B1ST
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar Essence STX | Realtek ALC1150
Power Supply Enermax Revolution 1250W 85+ | Super Flower Leadex Gold 650W (White)
Mouse Razer Basilisk Ultimate, Razer Naga Trinity | Razer Mamba 16000
Keyboard Razer Blackwidow Chroma V2 (Orange switch) | Razer Ornata Chroma
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
Top