• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Micron Ships 2400 PCIe Gen4 Client SSD Based on 176-layer 3D QLC NAND Flash

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,667 (7.43/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Micron Technology, Inc., today announced it has begun volume shipments of the world's first 176-layer QLC NAND SSD. Built with the most advanced NAND architecture, Micron's 176-layer QLC NAND delivers the industry's leading storage density and optimized performance for a broad range of data-rich applications. Designed for use cases spanning client and data center environments, Micron's transformative new NAND technology is now available with the introduction of the Micron 2400 SSD, the world's first 176-layer PCIe Gen4 QLC SSD for client applications. The new 176-layer QLC NAND will also be incorporated into select Micron Crucial consumer SSDs, and available as a component for system designers.

Micron's groundbreaking 176-layer QLC NAND provides a layer count and density unprecedented in QLC NAND flash and follows Micron's delivery of the industry's first 176-layer TLC NAND. Additionally, Micron's 176-layer QLC NAND enables 33% higher I/O speed and 24% lower read latency than Micron's prior generation solution. Its replacement-gate architecture is the only mass production QLC flash storage that combines charge trap with a CMOS-under-array design. These improvements are driving adoption of QLC SSDs in the client PC market, which is expected to triple QLC adoption by 2023, exceeding 35%, and reaching nearly 80% bit share in 2025.



"Micron's 2400 SSD builds upon our 176-layer NAND industry leadership to drive the transition to QLC-based storage for the client market," said Jeremy Werner, corporate vice president and general manager of Micron's Storage Business Unit. "Furthering our market leadership, we expect the new 2400 PCIe Gen4 SSD will significantly accelerate the adoption of QLC in client devices as it enables broader design options and more affordable capacity."

QLC NAND SSD for everyday computing
The Micron 2400 SSD delivers industry-leading storage density in a mainstream, value NVMe SSD to enable flexible OEM solution design and provide an uncompromising user experience. With 176-layer NAND and PCIe Gen4 technologies combined, the 2400 SSD doubles the performance of Micron's previous generation client SSD and delivers 23% faster read time for accelerated boot and load times.

The Micron 2400 SSD is also the world's only 2 TB 22x30mm M.2 SSD. This form factor shrinks the physical space required by 63% when compared with a 22x80mm M.2 form factor, providing design flexibility and making the drive ideal for small, mobile laptop designs. It is also available in 22x42mm and 22x80mm M.2 form factors, all with common firmware to minimize design qualification efforts.

The 2400 SSD provides a robust user experience across diverse use cases enabled in part by Micron's Host Memory Buffer technology that allows the host to flexibly optimize performance. The SSD features low-power consumption for all-day, untethered computing, with active idle power being reduced by 50% from Micron's previous generation solution. The Micron 2400 SSD is designed to meet Intel Project Athena requirements, enabling more than nine hours of real-world battery life on laptops even when using high-definition displays.



For more information, visit this page.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2013
Messages
2,202 (0.49/day)
Location
Deez Nutz, bozo!
System Name Rainbow Puke Machine Reborn :D
Processor Intel Core i5-11400 (MCE enabled, PL removed)
Motherboard ASUS STRIX B560-G GAMING WIFI mATX
Cooling Corsair H60i RGB PRO XT AIO + HD120 RGB (x3) + SP120 RGB PRO (x3) + Commander PRO
Memory Corsair Vengeance RGB RT 2 x 8GB 3200MHz DDR4 C16
Video Card(s) ASRock ARC B580 Challenger 12GB (Stock)
Storage Corsair MP600 PRO 1TB M.2 PCIe Gen4 x4 SSD
Display(s) LG 29WK600-W Ultrawide 1080p IPS Monitor (primary display)
Case Corsair iCUE 220T RGB Airflow (White) w/Lighting Node CORE + Lighting Node PRO RGB LED Strips (x4).
Audio Device(s) ASUS ROG Supreme FX S1220A w/ Savitech SV3H712 AMP + Sonic Studio 3 suite
Power Supply Corsair RM750x 80 Plus Gold Fully Modular
Mouse Corsair M65 RGB FPS Gaming (White)
Keyboard Corsair K60 PRO RGB Mechanical w/ Cherry VIOLA Switches
Software Tweaked Windows 11 Professional x64 (Update 24H2) OS
perfect to be a game library drive.
 
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
137 (0.04/day)
System Name Computer!
Processor i7-6700K
Motherboard AsRock Z170 Extreme 7+
Cooling EKWB on CPU & GPU, 240 slim and 360 Monsta, Aquacomputer Aquabus D5, Aquaaero 6 Pro.
Memory 32Gb Kingston Hyper-X 3Ghz
Video Card(s) Asus 980 Ti Strix
Storage 2 x 950 Pro
Display(s) Old Acer thing
Case NZXT 440 Modded
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Seasonic PII 600W Platinum
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma
Keyboard Logitech G15
Software Win 10 Pro
Barely faster than HDD but much smaller and more expensive.
Not a fan of QLC at all - but the read performance should be ok... or?
 

TheLostSwede

News Editor
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
18,468 (2.47/day)
Location
Sweden
System Name Overlord Mk MLI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 SE with offsets
Memory 32GB Team T-Create Expert DDR5 6000 MHz @ CL30-34-34-68
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 4080 Phantom GS
Storage 1TB Solidigm P44 Pro, 2 TB Corsair MP600 Pro, 2TB Kingston KC3000
Display(s) Acer XV272K LVbmiipruzx 4K@160Hz
Case Fractal Design Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 12 M 850 W
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Corsair K70 Max
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/yfsd9w
Barely faster than HDD but much smaller and more expensive.
Care to share what kind of hard drives you use, as I want me some of those, if these SSDs are barely any faster.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
15,769 (6.86/day)
Location
Midlands, UK
System Name My second and third PCs are Intel + Nvidia
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D @ 45 W TDP Eco Mode
Motherboard MSi Pro B650M-A Wifi
Cooling be quiet! Shadow Rock LP
Memory 2x 24 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800
Video Card(s) PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 XT
Storage 2 TB Corsair MP600 GS, 4 TB Seagate Barracuda
Display(s) Dell S3422DWG 34" 1440 UW 144 Hz
Case Corsair Crystal 280X
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z333 2.1 speakers, AKG Y50 headphones
Power Supply 750 W Seasonic Prime GX
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S
Keyboard Logitech G413 SE
Software Bazzite (Fedora Linux) KDE Plasma
Micron? :wtf: What about Crucial? I thought they were one and the same company. Or is it some kind of illusion of internal competition like with Coca-Cola and Fanta?
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
2,081 (0.49/day)
System Name DarkStar
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master 1.0 (BIOS F39g)
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420mm AIO (rev4)
Memory 4x8GB Patriot Viper DDR4 4400C19 @ 3733Mhz 14-14-13-27 1T
Video Card(s) GAINWARD GeForce RTX 2080Ti Phoenix GS 11GB GDDR6 @ 2100Mhz Core/16Gbps Mem
Storage 1TB Samsung 990 Pro (OS);2TB Samsung PM9A1;4TB XPG S70 Blade (Games);14TB WD UltraStar HC530 (Video)
Display(s) 27" ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q @ 2560x1440 @ 165Hz IPS G-Sync
Case be quiet! Dark Base Pro 900 Rev.2
Audio Device(s) SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Wireless
Power Supply 1000W Seasonic PRIME Ultra Titanium;600W APC SMT750i UPS
Mouse Logitech G604
Keyboard Logitech G910 Orion Spark
Software Windows 11 Pro x64 24H2 (Build 26100.3775)
Micron? :wtf: What about Crucial? I thought they were one and the same company. Or is it some kind of illusion of internal competition like with Coca-Cola and Fanta?
Micron = Enterprise
Crucial = Consumer
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
15,769 (6.86/day)
Location
Midlands, UK
System Name My second and third PCs are Intel + Nvidia
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D @ 45 W TDP Eco Mode
Motherboard MSi Pro B650M-A Wifi
Cooling be quiet! Shadow Rock LP
Memory 2x 24 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800
Video Card(s) PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 XT
Storage 2 TB Corsair MP600 GS, 4 TB Seagate Barracuda
Display(s) Dell S3422DWG 34" 1440 UW 144 Hz
Case Corsair Crystal 280X
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z333 2.1 speakers, AKG Y50 headphones
Power Supply 750 W Seasonic Prime GX
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S
Keyboard Logitech G413 SE
Software Bazzite (Fedora Linux) KDE Plasma
Micron = Enterprise
Crucial = Consumer
Ah! I thought Micron manufactured the chips, but Crucial was the brand of the final product. A bit of learning every day. :oops:
 

TheLostSwede

News Editor
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
18,468 (2.47/day)
Location
Sweden
System Name Overlord Mk MLI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 SE with offsets
Memory 32GB Team T-Create Expert DDR5 6000 MHz @ CL30-34-34-68
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 4080 Phantom GS
Storage 1TB Solidigm P44 Pro, 2 TB Corsair MP600 Pro, 2TB Kingston KC3000
Display(s) Acer XV272K LVbmiipruzx 4K@160Hz
Case Fractal Design Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 12 M 850 W
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Corsair K70 Max
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/yfsd9w
Micron = Enterprise
Crucial = Consumer
Micron is also OEM, used by system integrators, so not only enterprise.
Crucial being the retail brand of Micron if you want to use fancy terms.
 
Joined
Mar 7, 2011
Messages
5,043 (0.98/day)
Care to share what kind of hard drives you use, as I want me some of those, if these SSDs are barely any faster.
I am currently using Seagate 8TB IronWolf Pro HDDs in NAS(repurposed old PC) and for my PC use I have pair of Samsung 870 EVO SSDs. Many QLC drives seem to struggle with large file transfers(I copy large number of photos and videos at once and post culling they get pushed to NAS from PC).

Not a fan of QLC at all - but the read performance should be ok... or?
Would be curious to see if some OEM picks them up for making small portable SSDs given these 2230 SSD might be DRAMless it could be good replacement for portable HDDs and flash drives.
 

TheLostSwede

News Editor
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
18,468 (2.47/day)
Location
Sweden
System Name Overlord Mk MLI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 SE with offsets
Memory 32GB Team T-Create Expert DDR5 6000 MHz @ CL30-34-34-68
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 4080 Phantom GS
Storage 1TB Solidigm P44 Pro, 2 TB Corsair MP600 Pro, 2TB Kingston KC3000
Display(s) Acer XV272K LVbmiipruzx 4K@160Hz
Case Fractal Design Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 12 M 850 W
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Corsair K70 Max
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/yfsd9w
I am currently using Seagate 8TB IronWolf Pro HDDs in NAS(repurposed old PC) and for my PC use I have pair of Samsung 870 EVO SSDs. Many QLC drives seem to struggle with large file transfers(I copy large number of photos and videos at once and post culling they get pushed to NAS from PC).
Depends if you run out of SLC cache or not, but no SSD is slower than a hard drive.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
9,251 (4.09/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
Not a fan of QLC at all - but the read performance should be ok... or?
Yeah, the read performance will be good.

Like others say, for a game library drive that you barely ever write to at high speed, it'll be fine. I think every game store now streams installs direct to the target drive via the web - so as long as the pitiful QLC sustained write speeds are faster than your internet connection (or the download server) then it doesn't matter if your write performance is utter shit.

For application or OS use, QLC is a massive performance downgrade that cannot possibly justify the miniscule cost/GB savings.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 18, 2021
Messages
2,751 (1.95/day)
4500MB/s is not bad for a game drive, way faster than any HDD

Not bad? That's well above the max speed possible with a pcie3.0 drive (3940MB/s) which is awesome. WAYYYY above the max you can do with any HDD (last time I checked bellow 200MB/s)
 
D

Deleted member 24505

Guest
Not bad? That's well above the max speed possible with a pcie3.0 drive (3940MB/s) which is awesome. WAYYYY above the max you can do with any HDD (last time I checked bellow 200MB/s)

Tbh faster than my PCIe gen3x4 boot m.2 :p
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
15,769 (6.86/day)
Location
Midlands, UK
System Name My second and third PCs are Intel + Nvidia
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D @ 45 W TDP Eco Mode
Motherboard MSi Pro B650M-A Wifi
Cooling be quiet! Shadow Rock LP
Memory 2x 24 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800
Video Card(s) PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 XT
Storage 2 TB Corsair MP600 GS, 4 TB Seagate Barracuda
Display(s) Dell S3422DWG 34" 1440 UW 144 Hz
Case Corsair Crystal 280X
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z333 2.1 speakers, AKG Y50 headphones
Power Supply 750 W Seasonic Prime GX
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S
Keyboard Logitech G413 SE
Software Bazzite (Fedora Linux) KDE Plasma
Tbh faster than my PCIe gen3x4 boot m.2 :p
Reliability matters more than speed for a boot drive, imo. ;) As long as it's nvme, you don't feel the difference anyway.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
15,769 (6.86/day)
Location
Midlands, UK
System Name My second and third PCs are Intel + Nvidia
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D @ 45 W TDP Eco Mode
Motherboard MSi Pro B650M-A Wifi
Cooling be quiet! Shadow Rock LP
Memory 2x 24 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800
Video Card(s) PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 XT
Storage 2 TB Corsair MP600 GS, 4 TB Seagate Barracuda
Display(s) Dell S3422DWG 34" 1440 UW 144 Hz
Case Corsair Crystal 280X
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z333 2.1 speakers, AKG Y50 headphones
Power Supply 750 W Seasonic Prime GX
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S
Keyboard Logitech G413 SE
Software Bazzite (Fedora Linux) KDE Plasma
Micron? You can take QLC and shovel it into a landfill were it belongs.
Why do I have the feeling that PLC (penta level cell) and HLC (hexa level cell) are coming with even worse reliability? We'll get to the point when you have to buy a new system SSD for every reinstall.

And then the same companies preach about environmental protection, net zero and all that crap... yeah, right.

What I also don't get is that the transition from SLC to MLC and then from MLC to TLC brought cheaper SSDs to the market. Then why do QLC drives cost relatively the same as TLC ones?
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
30,553 (7.07/day)
Why do I have the feeling that PLC (penta level cell) and HLC (hexa level cell) are coming with even worse reliability?
Not without a breakthrough in NAND chemistry in both speed and chemical stability. HLC is actually not possible currently because the voltages required exceed the limits which the chemical formulation can handle. PLC isn't yet viable for the same reason. QLC is garbage likewise. If the chemical engineers can find a formulation that can either withstand the voltages needed to induce a multibit state or ideally require less voltage for shorter periods then QLC, PLC and beyond would be viable and even TLC would be vastly improved. The problem is that the existing chemistry just isn't very durable. This is why QLC cell durability is measured in the 100's of program/erase cycles and TLC is measured just barely in the 1500 range(compared to MLC at just over 22,000 and SLC north of 300,000). PLC in Micro's R&D has only recently broken the 100P/E cycle limit(no I will not discuss my source and if anyone doesn't like that, get knotted). Rumor has it Samsung has yet to do so. With such abysmal performance durability it would be damn near criminal to release PLC anytime soon as a viable storage solution.
Then why do QLC drives cost relatively the same as TLC ones?
Because they cost about the same to make.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
15,769 (6.86/day)
Location
Midlands, UK
System Name My second and third PCs are Intel + Nvidia
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D @ 45 W TDP Eco Mode
Motherboard MSi Pro B650M-A Wifi
Cooling be quiet! Shadow Rock LP
Memory 2x 24 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800
Video Card(s) PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 XT
Storage 2 TB Corsair MP600 GS, 4 TB Seagate Barracuda
Display(s) Dell S3422DWG 34" 1440 UW 144 Hz
Case Corsair Crystal 280X
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z333 2.1 speakers, AKG Y50 headphones
Power Supply 750 W Seasonic Prime GX
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S
Keyboard Logitech G413 SE
Software Bazzite (Fedora Linux) KDE Plasma
Because they cost about the same to make.
Then there should be no reason to make lesser quality products (other than to chase sale numbers).

MLC brought SSDs for the masses. TLC made extra large capacity SSDs possible. What has QLC brought to the table?
 
Joined
Jun 18, 2021
Messages
2,751 (1.95/day)
Then there should be no reason to make lesser quality products (other than to chase sale numbers).

MLC brought SSDs for the masses. TLC made extra large capacity SSDs possible. What has QLC brought to the table?

It increases storage even more. The thing is the storage increase starts to get less noticeable as we move upwards. The move from SLC to MLC doubled density but from TLC to QLC it's only a 25% difference
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
30,553 (7.07/day)
What has QLC brought to the table?
Nothing. The solution is not data density per cell.

Makers need to tell the industry pundits to release the SATA4-72gbps spec and release SATA drives with lots of TLC chips for higher capacity drives. M.2 is a great interface for ultra compact PC platforms like ultra compact desktops, laptops and ultrabooks. Normal desktops need normal drives. Practicality and functionality need to prevail. We don't need motherboards with 3 or 4 NVMe slots. What we need is standard size(2.5" & 3.5") drives of decently large capacity and a bus the supports the speed they can provide.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
15,769 (6.86/day)
Location
Midlands, UK
System Name My second and third PCs are Intel + Nvidia
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D @ 45 W TDP Eco Mode
Motherboard MSi Pro B650M-A Wifi
Cooling be quiet! Shadow Rock LP
Memory 2x 24 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800
Video Card(s) PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 XT
Storage 2 TB Corsair MP600 GS, 4 TB Seagate Barracuda
Display(s) Dell S3422DWG 34" 1440 UW 144 Hz
Case Corsair Crystal 280X
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z333 2.1 speakers, AKG Y50 headphones
Power Supply 750 W Seasonic Prime GX
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S
Keyboard Logitech G413 SE
Software Bazzite (Fedora Linux) KDE Plasma
Nothing. The solution is not data density per cell.

Makers need to tell the industry pundits to release the SATA4-72gbps spec and release SATA drives with lots of TLC chips for higher capacity drives. M.2 is a great interface for ultra compact PC platforms like ultra compact desktops, laptops and ultrabooks. Normal desktops need normal drives. Practicality and functionality need to prevail. We don't need motherboards with 3 or 4 NVMe slots. What we need is standard size(2.5" & 3.5") drives of decently large capacity and a bus the supports the speed they can provide.
I agree and disagree. SATA is great for data storage, although I prefer having only M.2 drives in my desktop PC for better cable management.
 
Top