• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Russia Cut-Off From ARM CPU Designs in Tightening Sanctions Landscape

Raevenlord

News Editor
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
3,755 (1.35/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name The Ryzening
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard MSI X570 MAG TOMAHAWK
Cooling Lian Li Galahad 360mm AIO
Memory 32 GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3733 (4x 8 GB)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 3070 Ti
Storage Boot: Transcend MTE220S 2TB, Kintson A2000 1TB, Seagate Firewolf Pro 14 TB
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG270UP (1440p 144 Hz IPS)
Case Lian Li O11DX Dynamic White
Audio Device(s) iFi Audio Zen DAC
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ 750 W
Mouse Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Software Windows 10 x64
Russia has been dealt yet another blow to its technological capabilities, as countries around the world engage in an economic war against the nation following its invasion of Ukraine back in February. The UK government has recently added two major chip-design Russian companies, Baikal Electronics and MCST (Moscow Center of SPARC Technologies) to its sanctioned entity list, meaning that these companies are no longer able to acquire ARM licensing for its homegrown chips. The move is just another in a series of coordinated (and uncoordinated) sanctions.

According to a note provided by the UK government, the aim of the sanctions is to curb Russia's access to devices that could support its war efforts in Ukraine while propping-up the country's degrading technological infrastructure. This effectively shuts the door for Russia to solicit manufacturing from foundries outside its own territory. And even if Russia elected to manufacture its ARM-based designs in-country, thus skirting sanction-respecting foundries, the country's chip manufacturing is currently thought to only be capable of manufacturing chips at a 90 nm process - which the Western world has moved on from since 2006 already.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source
 
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
8,115 (2.29/day)
Location
SE Michigan
System Name Dumbass
Processor AMD Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ASUS TUF gaming B650
Cooling Artic Liquid Freezer 2 - 420mm
Memory G.Skill Sniper 32gb DDR5 6000
Video Card(s) GreenTeam 4070 ti super 16gb
Storage Samsung EVO 500gb & 1Tb, 2tb HDD, 500gb WD Black
Display(s) 1x Nixeus NX_EDG27, 2x Dell S2440L (16:9)
Case Phanteks Enthoo Primo w/8 140mm SP Fans
Audio Device(s) onboard (realtek?) - SPKRS:Logitech Z623 200w 2.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1000i
Mouse Steeseries Esports Wireless
Keyboard Corsair K100
Software windows 10 H
Benchmark Scores https://i.imgur.com/aoz3vWY.jpg?2
It sure took them some time. I also wonder how much is imported through proxies?
The UK will nitpick specific products to sanction one by one. My magic 8-ball refuses to add to what they should or shouldnt do.
 
Joined
Apr 11, 2021
Messages
214 (0.20/day)
Weaponising ARM's IP is yet another double edged sword, it will probably push others (meaning especially China) to look harder into alternative solutions unencumbered by patents, like RISC V.
 
Joined
Jul 10, 2017
Messages
2,671 (1.09/day)
Weaponising ARM's IP is yet another double edged sword, it will probably push others (meaning especially China) to look harder into alternative solutions unencumbered by patents, like RISC V.
Something makes me think that China at least can produce viable designs even withouth the official IP license. Not quite the case with CCCP.
 
Joined
Apr 11, 2021
Messages
214 (0.20/day)
Something makes me think that China at least can produce viable designs even withouth the official IP license. Not quite the case with CCCP.
The CCCP actually used to produce quite a few viable clones without an official IP license.
 
Joined
Jul 10, 2017
Messages
2,671 (1.09/day)
The CCCP actually used to produce quite a few viable clones without an official IP license.
Eh, at the time.

While 3nm GAA is surely not needed for military purposes, one can argue that modern weapon systems (or at least tactical ones) are not competitive without a good manufacturing process (node). One that CCCP currently don't have.
Exempli gratia, the now popular Javelins, MANPADS and such rely on imaging and other heavy compute intensive (in realtime nonetheless). AFAIK the only publicly known Russian ATGM is only laser-guided i.e., LoS. Problem here is the guidance electronics. Javelins for example are fire-and-forget after lock is obtained.
 
Joined
Aug 20, 2007
Messages
20,714 (3.41/day)
System Name Pioneer
Processor Ryzen R9 7950X
Motherboard GIGABYTE Aorus Elite X670 AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 + A whole lotta Sunon and Corsair Maglev blower fans...
Memory 64GB (4x 16GB) G.Skill Flare X5 @ DDR5-6000 CL30
Video Card(s) XFX RX 7900 XTX Speedster Merc 310
Storage 2x Crucial P5 Plus 2TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSDs
Display(s) 55" LG 55" B9 OLED 4K Display
Case Thermaltake Core X31
Audio Device(s) TOSLINK->Schiit Modi MB->Asgard 2 DAC Amp->AKG Pro K712 Headphones or HDMI->B9 OLED
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti Pro 850W
Mouse Logitech G305 Lightspeed Wireless
Keyboard WASD Code v3 with Cherry Green keyswitches
Software Windows 11 Enterprise (legit), Gentoo Linux x64
one can argue that modern weapon systems (or at least tactical ones) are not competitive without a good manufacturing process (node).
I don't think you really can. Military and space stuff to my knowledge often uses exceptionally old nodes due to the fact they can be more easily radiation hardened. 65nm+ is the rule, not the exception.
 
Joined
Jul 10, 2017
Messages
2,671 (1.09/day)
I don't think you really can. Military and space stuff to my knowledge often uses exceptionally old nodes due to the fact they can be more easily radiation hardened. 65nm+ is the rule, not the exception.
I'm more inclined to agree that there is no universal answer. It can swing wildly depending on the weapon and the application. And we are talking about battlefield weapons here.

With SIGINT and others in this line, fast, modern chips make all the difference.
 
D

Deleted member 185088

Guest
Weaponising ARM's IP is yet another double edged sword, it will probably push others (meaning especially China) to look harder into alternative solutions unencumbered by patents, like RISC V.
I'm all for China offering us another way so we won't be dependent on few players, especially not very reliable given that governments can suddenly make stupid policies aimed at ruining everyone's life. We have morons in power.
 
Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
3,890 (0.87/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Motherboard MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory Team Group Dark Pro 8Pack Edition 3600Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 FE
Storage Kingston A2000 1TB + Seagate HDD workhorse
Display(s) Samsung 50" QN94A Neo QLED
Case Antec 1200
Power Supply Seasonic Focus GX-850
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma
Keyboard Logitech UltraX
Software Windows 11
It all helps, but now we need the EU to stop funding Putins war.
 
Joined
Aug 20, 2007
Messages
20,714 (3.41/day)
System Name Pioneer
Processor Ryzen R9 7950X
Motherboard GIGABYTE Aorus Elite X670 AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 + A whole lotta Sunon and Corsair Maglev blower fans...
Memory 64GB (4x 16GB) G.Skill Flare X5 @ DDR5-6000 CL30
Video Card(s) XFX RX 7900 XTX Speedster Merc 310
Storage 2x Crucial P5 Plus 2TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSDs
Display(s) 55" LG 55" B9 OLED 4K Display
Case Thermaltake Core X31
Audio Device(s) TOSLINK->Schiit Modi MB->Asgard 2 DAC Amp->AKG Pro K712 Headphones or HDMI->B9 OLED
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti Pro 850W
Mouse Logitech G305 Lightspeed Wireless
Keyboard WASD Code v3 with Cherry Green keyswitches
Software Windows 11 Enterprise (legit), Gentoo Linux x64
I'm more inclined to agree that there is no universal answer. It can swing wildly depending on the weapon and the application. And we are talking about battlefield weapons here.

With SIGINT and others in this line, fast, modern chips make all the difference.
That's probably an acurate take. Not everything in the army enters the stratosphere.
 
Low quality post by Aleksandar_038
Joined
Jul 10, 2017
Messages
2,671 (1.09/day)
"currently", this country has been gone for more than 30 years lol
Probably right. Claims across the web say Russians don't have anything better than 90nm. And also zero FPGA game, which is kind of critical for radars and most military RF applications.
 
Joined
Jun 18, 2021
Messages
2,253 (2.22/day)
Weaponising ARM's IP is yet another double edged sword, it will probably push others (meaning especially China) to look harder into alternative solutions unencumbered by patents, like RISC V.

Increasing adoption of RISC V would be a good thing, but i don't think China cares either way, they simply ignore any copyright or patent that's not chinese and with the dicy situation with the chinese branch of ARM they already have everything they need to keep going for a long while (they just won't get any new designs).
 
Joined
Jul 10, 2017
Messages
2,671 (1.09/day)
Increasing adoption of RISC V would be a good thing, but i don't think China cares either way, they simply ignore any copyright or patent that's not chinese and with the dicy situation with the chinese branch of ARM they already have everything they need to keep going for a long while (they just won't get any new designs).
I agree. CCP can choose to copy whatever they need for military purposes. It's not like someone will go and check their entire arsenal.
 
Joined
Jun 18, 2021
Messages
2,253 (2.22/day)
I agree. CCP can choose to copy whatever they need for military purposes. It's not like someone will go and check their entire arsenal.

It's not just military stuff, they simply do no enforce western copyright or patents, this has been known and demonstrated for years. One of the few things they don't have is competitive semiconductor manufacturing capabilities and still depend on TSMC for a lot of stuff which in turn depends on western tech (even SMIC is also dependent on western tech) so it's a big balancing act of who can supply who and how to work around the sanctions
 
Joined
Jul 10, 2017
Messages
2,671 (1.09/day)
It's not just military stuff, they simply do no enforce western copyright or patents, this has been known and demonstrated for years. One of the few things they don't have is competitive semiconductor manufacturing capabilities and still depend on TSMC for a lot of stuff which in turn depends on western tech (even SMIC is also dependent on western tech) so it's a big balancing act of who can supply who and how to work around the sanctions
Well, the rest is also true but I was talking exclusively about their military stuff.
It is not like:
- Hey, China! We want to check if your missiles use stolen IP and unlicensed technology!
- OK! Just tell us where you want the missiles delivered, so that you can check them yourselves! :D
 
Joined
Aug 1, 2016
Messages
32 (0.01/day)
Probably right. Claims across the web say Russians don't have anything better than 90nm. And also zero FPGA game, which is kind of critical for radars and most military RF applications.
FYI most of military and automobile industry still use 130nm and 180nm techprocess
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
11,878 (2.31/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo/ Asus strix scar II
Processor Amd R5 5900X/ Intel 8750H
Motherboard Crosshair hero8 impact/Asus
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu ek suprim Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in four sticks./16Gb/16GB
Video Card(s) Powercolour RX7900XT Reference/Rtx 2060
Storage Silicon power 2TB nvme/8Tb external/1Tb samsung Evo nvme 2Tb sata ssd/1Tb nvme
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync.dell shiter
Case Lianli 011 dynamic/strix scar2
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi/Asus stock
Mouse Roccat Kova/ Logitech G wireless
Keyboard Roccat Aimo 120
VR HMD Oculus rift
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8726 vega 3dmark timespy/ laptop Timespy 6506
Probably right. Claims across the web say Russians don't have anything better than 90nm. And also zero FPGA game, which is kind of critical for radars and most military RF applications.
Exactly, their Orlan drone, had, as well as a full canon DSLR digital camera glued in had several abused writing chips( obfuscated sources) and that's now , with chips from many top maker's that they noted(in the article), I zoomed in and also faintly viewed the words xilinx Spartan on one, they didn't mention it in the article but I thought wow, that's some useful tech they managed to acquire.
I imagine they'll get what they need from alterative avenues, one's they clearly already have open.

As for military chip's, I am not so sure they're all such big node chip's even space has seen vast improvement in radiation hardened IC technology.
I wouldn't wager, I am not totally sure though, just things like the new cockpit screens, Aesa, gallium, based radar chips etc surely some of the latest kit Has to use the later tech no.
 
Joined
Jul 10, 2017
Messages
2,671 (1.09/day)
Erm... most of it is now sub 65nm.
Yes, I knew that is the case with automotive, since nobody wants to deal with 50-100W chips and their cooling in the cars.
Case in point - Tesla is a big customer of nvidia's. Many other high-end brands want only the crop of the cream, so people need to actually wait for over 12 months for their new ride. OK, in all fairness other electronic components are also in demand for vehicles, not just chips.

Exactly, their Orlan drone, had, as well as a full canon DSLR digital camera glued in had several abused writing chips( obfuscated sources) and that's now , with chips from many top maker's that they noted(in the article), I zoomed in and also faintly viewed the words xilinx Spartan on one, they didn't mention it in the article but I thought wow, that's some useful tech they managed to acquire.
I imagine they'll get what they need from alterative avenues, one's they clearly already have open.
Also a Hikvision dome camera! Fookin' hell, mate! :D
 
Top