• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

ASUS ROG Strix XG32UQ Brings HDMI 2.1 and 4K at 160 Hz

TheLostSwede

News Editor
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
18,489 (2.47/day)
Location
Sweden
System Name Overlord Mk MLI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 SE with offsets
Memory 32GB Team T-Create Expert DDR5 6000 MHz @ CL30-34-34-68
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 4080 Phantom GS
Storage 1TB Solidigm P44 Pro, 2 TB Corsair MP600 Pro, 2TB Kingston KC3000
Display(s) Acer XV272K LVbmiipruzx 4K@160Hz
Case Fractal Design Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 12 M 850 W
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Corsair K70 Max
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/yfsd9w
ASUS has unveiled its first 32-inch ROG Strix monitor with 4K resolution in the shape of the XG32UQ. It comes with all the features you'd expect from a modern 4K display, such as HDMI 2.1 and a 120 Hz mode for consoles. It obviously also has a DP 1.4 port and supports up to 160 Hz refresh rate thanks to its Fast IPS panel. It's certified for FreeSync Premium Pro and is G-Sync Compatible, as well as having a DisplayHDR 600 certification. Oddly enough, ASUS didn't implement USB-C support, nor can the XG32UQ function as a KVM, a feature that has become pretty standard on higher-end monitors like this. It does have a USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 Gbps) Type-B input and two USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A outs though.

The panel meets 96 percent of the DCI-P3 and 130 percent of the sRGB colour space and the typical brightness in SDR mode is 450 cd/m². ASUS has also implemented it's game visual features and what the company calls extreme low motion blur. The panel comes factory calibrated, so the XG32UQ should be possible to use for work as well as gaming. ASUS has also taken a leaf out of Corsair's playbook by implementing a screw mount at the top of the stand, to which something like a webcam mount could be fitted. There's no word on pricing, but based on pricing for similar products, we'd hazard a guess that it'll end up around the $1000 mark.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source
 
So it's basically PG32UQ, but with 165Hz, insted of 144Hz...

And the prices of 4K >120Hz PC displays are ridiculous:
PC: 32" 4K 144-165Hz, no FALD - 1000€
TV: 65" 4K 120Hz, >1000 zones FALD - also 1000€

Humanity has sinned...
 
So it's basically PG32UQ, but with 165Hz, insted of 144Hz...

And the prices of 4K >120Hz PC displays are ridiculous:
PC: 32" 4K 144-165Hz, no FALD - 1000€
TV: 65" 4K 120Hz, >1000 zones FALD - also 1000€

Humanity has sinned...

1440p model is $400. 4k same quality is $1000. Makes no sense.
 
So it's basically PG32UQ, but with 165Hz, insted of 144Hz...

And the prices of 4K >120Hz PC displays are ridiculous:
PC: 32" 4K 144-165Hz, no FALD - 1000€
TV: 65" 4K 120Hz, >1000 zones FALD - also 1000€

Humanity has sinned...

Asus execs every time they decide a new monitor pricing...
1659001465211.png
 
Asus execs every time they decide a new monitor pricing...
View attachment 256140

It ain't just Asus - Acer, Benq, MSI, Gigabyte... It became a given that a 4K >120Hz monitor has to cost at least 1k. And if there is any FALD system, the price is 2x-3x as much.
 
So it's basically PG32UQ, but with 165Hz, insted of 144Hz...

And the prices of 4K >120Hz PC displays are ridiculous:
PC: 32" 4K 144-165Hz, no FALD - 1000€
TV: 65" 4K 120Hz, >1000 zones FALD - also 1000€

Humanity has sinned...
Because these are niche, premium products with flagship branding designed to extract money from a market that ASUS knows isn't sensitive about price. You need a 3090Ti to push many modern games at 4K120 so why not throw another $500 onto the cost of the monitor? The only people interested in such products already spend $5000 on their rig.
 
So it's basically PG32UQ, but with 165Hz, insted of 144Hz...

And the prices of 4K >120Hz PC displays are ridiculous:
PC: 32" 4K 144-165Hz, no FALD - 1000€
TV: 65" 4K 120Hz, >1000 zones FALD - also 1000€

Humanity has sinned...
Regular backlight on this one though.
Also, 160, not 165 Hz.

Typo.

At least this ain't curved.
Fixed.

It ain't just Asus - Acer, Benq, MSI, Gigabyte... It became a given that a 4K >120Hz monitor has to cost at least 1k. And if there is any FALD system, the price is 2x-3x as much.
Not Acer. They have a very similar model on sale here for around $600. It's admittedly only 27" not 32", but it had USB-C with 65W PD and KVM support.
 
Type-B input
Last time I saw one of those was on an ancient inkjet printer from way back....

Hello Asus, this is 2001 calling, and well, you know the rest, hehehe :)
 
Monitor pricing has become a thorn. Its these little steps that we need to get past for prices to return to reasonable price expectations. Like when 120Hz/1080p+ panels became the average standard.
 
Monitor pricing has become a thorn. Its these little steps that we need to get past for prices to return to reasonable price expectations. Like when 120Hz/1080p+ panels became the average standard.
People need to stop buying overpriced 1080p monitors.
 
Last time I saw one of those was on an ancient inkjet printer from way back....

Hello Asus, this is 2001 calling, and well, you know the rest, hehehe :)
It's common connection for built in USB hubs.
 
$1000 for this crap, Asus has not released a price yet but if is indeed 1k usd then it will get to, not able to be sold on arrival or in the future, 500 usd would be a good price for it.
 
I bet this will be using crappy AUO panel which will have the same amount of issues just like the numbers in the price. :D
 
How can LG create a nicer, bigger and technically superior TV for less.
Monitor manufacturers should get their act together, a 32" 4k120 monitor shouldn't cost more than 600€ especially with no FALD.
 
How can LG create a nicer, bigger and technically superior TV for less.
Monitor manufacturers should get their act together, a 32" 4k120 monitor shouldn't cost more than 600€ especially with no FALD.
It's 160 Hz and the price hasn't been revealed. It's just a guess based on what similar products from Asus and its competitors cost.
 
It's common connection for built in USB hubs.
That does not take away from the fact that is old, outdated and should have been retired long ago.... and if they had sense enough to use a 40GB/s USB-C/Thunderbolt port instead, they could have eliminated at least half of those other connections too :D
 
It's common connection for built in USB hubs.
Not only common, it's how the USB alliance actually designed it. Anyone NOT using a B-connector for an uplink to a hub is doing it wrong.
 
Not only common, it's how the USB alliance actually designed it. Anyone NOT using a B-connector for an uplink to a hub is doing it wrong.
Well, you could use a micro USB-B 3.0 or USB-C as well...
Can't say I've seen any monitors with micro USB-B 3.0 though.
 
For that price I'm better off with a nice 21:9 monitor, which is better in every way.
 
Back
Top