Aquinus
Resident Wat-man
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2012
- Messages
- 13,161 (2.82/day)
- Location
- Concord, NH, USA
System Name | Apollo |
---|---|
Processor | Intel Core i9 9880H |
Motherboard | Some proprietary Apple thing. |
Memory | 64GB DDR4-2667 |
Video Card(s) | AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2 |
Storage | 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External |
Display(s) | Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays |
Case | MacBook Pro (16", 2019) |
Audio Device(s) | AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers |
Power Supply | 96w Power Adapter |
Mouse | Logitech MX Master 3 |
Keyboard | Logitech G915, GL Clicky |
Software | MacOS 12.1 |
Pardon my ignorance, but what do you think hunting is?My point was, that guns were not created to hunt - they were created to kill.
Bows and arrows were designed to kill. Both animals and humans. So, I'm not sure where you're going with this. I'm seeing conflicting points in your argument. Again, it's a potentially lethal tool, both of them, with the same intent. A firearm is merely an evolution of more archaic tools. What you're describing is rhetorical nonsense.Edit: if the item quoted had been a bow and arrrow - yes, it'd been fine. Bows were created to hunt. Guns weren't.