• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD 3D V-Cache RAM Disk Delivers Over 182 GB/s and 175 GB/s Read and Write Speeds

Joined
Apr 30, 2011
Messages
2,656 (0.56/day)
Location
Greece
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 5600@80W
Motherboard MSI B550 Tomahawk
Cooling ZALMAN CNPS9X OPTIMA
Memory 2*8GB PATRIOT PVS416G400C9K@3733MT_C16
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Pulse 12GB
Storage Sandisk SSD 128GB, Kingston A2000 NVMe 1TB, Samsung F1 1TB, WD Black 10TB
Display(s) AOC 27G2U/BK IPS 144Hz
Case SHARKOON M25-W 7.1 BLACK
Audio Device(s) Realtek 7.1 onboard
Power Supply Seasonic Core GC 500W
Mouse Sharkoon SHARK Force Black
Keyboard Trust GXT280
Software Win 7 Ultimate 64bit/Win 10 pro 64bit/Manjaro Linux
Just a metric of speed without practical use. 3D cache is used where needed and helps much there. Other than that, a fun test this.
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
723 (0.17/day)
Location
Poland
System Name THU
Processor Intel Core i5-13600KF
Motherboard ASUS PRIME Z790-P D4
Cooling SilentiumPC Fortis 3 v2 + Arctic Cooling MX-2
Memory Crucial Ballistix 2x16 GB DDR4-3600 CL16 (dual rank)
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4070 Ventus 3X OC 12 GB GDDR6X (2610/21000 @ 0.91 V)
Storage Lexar NM790 2 TB + Corsair MP510 960 GB + PNY XLR8 CS3030 500 GB + Toshiba E300 3 TB
Display(s) LG OLED C8 55" + ASUS VP229Q
Case Fractal Design Define R6
Audio Device(s) Yamaha RX-V381 + Monitor Audio Bronze 6 + Bronze FX | FiiO E10K-TC + Sony MDR-7506
Power Supply Corsair RM650
Mouse Logitech M705 Marathon
Keyboard Corsair K55 RGB PRO
Software Windows 10 Home
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks in 2024?
And the sad thing is, if you put an Unreal Engine game on there, you'd still get shader compilation and traversal stutters. :D
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,946 (0.65/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
Processor OCed 5800X3D
Motherboard Asucks C6H
Cooling Air
Memory 32GB
Video Card(s) OCed 6800XT
Storage NVMees
Display(s) 32" Dull curved 1440
Case Freebie glass idk
Audio Device(s) Sennheiser
Power Supply Don't even remember
Damn... When I read the title, I was shocked and thought, "What product is AMD making now? A new type of SSD? What a bully wanting to succeed in all the areas that intel failed." But it's just a gimmick. :p:p

Theoretically, they could make an existing LGA chock full of these and stacked on each other as high as thermals allow (dual socket system). It would be so fast that your dick would fly off.
 
Joined
Feb 1, 2019
Messages
2,678 (1.39/day)
Location
UK, Leicester
System Name Main PC
Processor 13700k
Motherboard Asrock Z690 Steel Legend D4 - Bios 13.02
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S
Memory 32 Gig 3200CL14
Video Card(s) 3080 RTX FE 10G
Storage 1TB 980 PRO (OS, games), 2TB SN850X (games), 2TB DC P4600 (work), 2x 3TB WD Red, 2x 4TB WD Red
Display(s) LG 27GL850
Case Fractal Define R4
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar D2X
Power Supply Antec HCG 750 Gold
Software Windows 10 21H2 LTSC
This is very nice but I expect the advantage of cache is latency rather than the bandwidth.

Need a benchmark testing the latency compared to a normal RAM disk and I expect it will be blowing the RAM out of the water.
 
Joined
Nov 26, 2021
Messages
1,372 (1.52/day)
Location
Mississauga, Canada
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Motherboard ASUS TUF Gaming X570-PRO (WiFi 6)
Cooling Noctua NH-C14S (two fans)
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3200
Video Card(s) Reference Vega 64
Storage Intel 665p 1TB, WD Black SN850X 2TB, Crucial MX300 1TB SATA, Samsung 830 256 GB SATA
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG27, and Samsung S23A700
Case Fractal Design R5
Power Supply Seasonic PRIME TITANIUM 850W
Mouse Logitech
VR HMD Oculus Rift
Software Windows 11 Pro, and Ubuntu 20.04
so, the speed of these L3 cache is just fast as RAM
because right now, with quad channel 6000MHz DDR5, you can already reach 192GB/s
The L3 is vastly faster than DRAM. The figure in the CrystalDiskMark test is the bandwidth available to a single core from the L3. The bandwidth scales with the number of cores. A 7950X gets over 1800 GB/s from L3 with all cores reading from the L3. On the other hand, the 7950X only gets 72.85 GB/s from a 128-bit bus to DDR5-6000. Compare the throughput from a hypothetical 256-bit bus to that L3 result and you'll see why L3 is used. I haven't even touched upon the gap in latency between L3 and DRAM, but that one is even more insurmountable.

1701688969383.png
 
Joined
Jul 30, 2019
Messages
2,477 (1.41/day)
System Name Not a thread ripper but pretty good.
Processor Ryzen 9 5950x
Motherboard ASRock X570 Taichi (revision 1.06, BIOS/UEFI version P5.50)
Cooling EK-Quantum Velocity, EK-Quantum Reflection PC-O11, EK-CoolStream PE 360, XSPC TX360
Memory Micron DDR4-3200 ECC Unbuffered Memory (4 sticks, 128GB, 18ASF4G72AZ-3G2F1)
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon RX 5700 & EK-Quantum Vector Radeon RX 5700 +XT & Backplate
Storage Samsung 2TB 980 PRO 2TB Gen4x4 NVMe, 2 x Samsung 2TB 970 EVO Plus Gen3x4 NVMe, AMD Radeon RAMDisk
Display(s) 2 x 4K LG 27UL600-W (and HUANUO Dual Monitor Mount)
Case Lian Li PC-O11 Dynamic Black (original model)
Power Supply Corsair RM750x
Mouse Logitech M575
Keyboard Corsair Strafe RGB MK.2
Software Windows 10 Professional (64bit)
Benchmark Scores Typical for non-overclocked CPU.
The L3 is vastly faster than DRAM. The figure in the CrystalDiskMark test is the bandwidth available to a single core from the L3. The bandwidth scales with the number of cores. A 7950X gets over 1800 GB/s from L3 with all cores reading from the L3. On the other hand, the 7950X only gets 72.85 GB/s from a 128-bit bus to DDR5-6000. Compare the throughput from a hypothetical 256-bit bus to that L3 result and you'll see why L3 is used. I haven't even touched upon the gap in latency between L3 and DRAM, but that one is even more insurmountable.

View attachment 324114
3950x wow. Still a great CPU.
 
Top