• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D Flagship Processor Slides Down to $565 to Greet the i9-14900KS

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,670 (7.43/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
AMD's flagship desktop processor, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D, saw an impressive retailer-level price-cut, sending its street-price down to $565 on Newegg, or nearly $135 (19%) below its launch price of $700. The processor is listed at $595, but a $30 discount coupon sends the price down to $565. It's not just Newegg, even Amazon US has the chip listed at $591, with a $26 discount coupon sending it down to $565. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is about 1% slower than the 7800X3D at gaming, but is still about as fast as the Core i9-14900K at gaming; and its 8 additional "Zen 4" cores helps shore up productivity performance over the 7800X3D.

Price-cuts to the Ryzen 9 7950X3D can be seen as a move to greet last week's launch of the Intel Core i9-14900KS, an enthusiast-magnet for its up to 6.20 GHz clock-speeds, and overclocking headroom; but in our testing, the new chip barely beats the Ryzen 7 7800X3D in gaming; although is 2% faster than the regular i9-14900K at both gaming- and productivity.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source
 
Competition is a wonderful thing for consumers!
 
Feels like the only thing dropping in price is tech and specifically AMD products.....
Kinda makes it hard to justify new tech purchases when I'm spending over $1K a month on groceries for 2 people...
 
Compared to 7800x3D neither of those 2 are worth spending extra for those who are going to be using their PCs just for gaming.
 
Hi,
Miners didn't clear out stock like the 7950x ?
Damn guess they will now hehe
 
Imagine if AMD could come up with something like a 7850X3D with higher clocks. Instead of lowering prices, they could have a KS moment of their own.
 
I don't get it, the 7800X3D clearly beats the 14900KS in your own TPU review, why do you say the 14900KS barely beats a 7800X3D in gaming? It's flipped the other way around mate, and it's not even barely but almost 6% at 720p.

Imagine if AMD could come up with something like a 7850X3D with higher clocks. Instead of lowering prices, they could have a KS moment of their own.

This won't do anything as the 7800X3D is already the fastest gaming CPU by a margin and those higher clocks will not do much if anything for productivity
 
"[...] but in our testing, the [14900KS] barely beats the Ryzen 7 7800X3D in gaming"
It does?

 
"but is still about as fast as the Core i9-14900K"

You mean "while the Core i9-14900K is almost as fast until your house burns down the..."
 
Imagine if AMD could come up with something like a 7850X3D with higher clocks. Instead of lowering prices, they could have a KS moment of their own.
From what I've read Zen 5 is already faster than Zen 4 X3D for gaming and no clock speed penalties and great productivity scores to boot. I know what I'm waiting for. I do hope though Zen 5 X3D shows more improvements on clocks, but IMO it'll be Zen 6 that makes most sense for X3D.
 
The only thing to take into consideration is that both the 7950X3D and the 7900X3D suffer from issue when it comes to parking the wrong side of the chip. It is similar to with Intel and the scheduler not assigning tasks to the right cores. If anyone is going to get an X3D chip, go for the one where it has only one chiplet with the V cache like the 5800X3D or the 7800X3D and save yourself the headache.
 
Back
Top