• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Team Group Launches the T-Force GC PRO Gen 5 SSD

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,903 (7.37/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Team Group today introduced the T-Force GC PRO, its new performance-segment M.2 NVMe Gen 5 SSD. The new T-Force GC PRO is not to be confused with the T-Force GE PRO that Team Group launched in January 2024, although the two appear almost identical. The newer GC PRO is powered by the same InnoGrit "Tacoma" IG5666 controller as the GE PRO, but with slightly toned down speeds.

The GC PRO comes in 2 TB and 4 TB capacity variants, with maximum sequential speeds of 12,500 MB/s reads, with 11,000 MB/s writes. For comparison, the flagship GE PRO does 14,000 MB/s max sequential reads, albeit with the same 11,000 MB/s max sequential writes. The GC PRO is hence designed to stike a slightly lower price point which could see it square off against pre-Max14um Phison-powered SSD models. Both the 2 TB and 4 TB models offer identical sequential transfer speeds, but differ with endurance—1,200 TBW and 2,400 TBW, respectively. Although a heatsink is recommended by the manufacturer, the drive comes with a graphene-coated metal-foil heatspreader. The company didn't reveal pricing, the drives are backed by 5-year warranties.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
What is the full spec wise difference between GC PRO and GE PRO ??

1721982682473.png
 
What is the full spec wise difference between GC PRO and GE PRO ??
I'm wondering how they calculated the slightly lower endurance. Both use the same Micron flash chips, most probably. Less overprovisioning due to lower bin chips with more bad blocks?
 
That "graphene coated metal foil" can do nothing to tame the heat of the SSD. If that works, then why you need some massive passive or active cooling on these PCI-E 5.0 SSDs?
 
That "graphene coated metal foil" can do nothing to tame the heat of the SSD. If that works, then why you need some massive passive or active cooling on these PCI-E 5.0 SSDs?
It's a thermal spreader, not a heat sink.

Conceptually, they're intended to spread the thermal load over the mass of the drive.
Oversimplified: The few 'hot' parts dump heat into the 'cool, but thermally tolerant' parts.

These 'allotropic carbon' thermal spreaders work like magic. But, only at "spreading" heat.
If the drive has 0 airflow and/or is under constant heavy load, it's going to throttle.

Basically, these 'spreader stickers' are to cover the majority of users.
Even, thrown into a suffocated laptop, the spreader helps keep the drive from killing itself w/in warranty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xvi
Back
Top