• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Achieves Top 10 Best-Selling and Most Sought-After CPUs on Amazon

(lazy edit)

1731938989023.png


:EDIT::

@AleksandarK Title needs fixing... "Achieses"

1731939168550.png
 
Uhh, this is as boring as the GPU market :(
 
So is it “a-cheeses” or “ achieves” in the article title?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0054.png
    IMG_0054.png
    221.8 KB · Views: 52
Disappointing, but unsurprising, to see that this thread turned into an Intel conspiracy theory clusterfuck immediately.
 
Could we see socketable ARM and RISC-V processors in such lists in the near future?
Nothing is stopping anyone from making them, but who would do it? Making big ARM is rather difficult, you need to make some Zen sized cores with ARM ISAs and even qualcomm has struggled to make them. It's an expensive industry.

RISC-V? No chance. The ISA is still far too immature for mass deployment or anything powerful and flexible enough for desktop use.
 
Now if only AMD could also claim this much mindshare in the laptop space...
Amd can't afford enough wafers to supply OEM's. Until that changes AMD won't take over the laptop market
 
I hope that Intel does something not to fall too behind Amd's offerings.
 
Amd can't afford enough wafers to supply OEM's. Until that changes AMD won't take over the laptop market

This has got to be the longest running unproven narrative without a single shred of evidence. People used to use this excuse back when Intel was paying OEMs to not buy AMD and it propagated because back then because AMD was in fact very small. It's the classic "nugget of truth used to bastardize the whole" type misinformation, it takes a true observation (AMD was small) and uses it to come to a completely unfounded conclusion.

It didn't make much sense back then and it makes zero sense today given how big AMD is now. You are implying that the barrier keeping AMD from the OEM market is money yet AMD has been putting out massive outlays as of late in acquisitions and R&D. AMD clearly has the money and it's obvious the problem is not simply a lack of funds.
 
Last edited:
Ryzen 5 5500 is a little beast overclocker and great bang for buck.
 
Does not surprise me since AMD does not Build this P-core E-core crap. Weaktel might claim they have 24 Core but its really no 24 core. It's 8 core Performance which is the only ones that count and the E core is lame because no game uses them. Amd 16 core Pure performance will always beat out 8 core. Weaktel cannot understand that.

I think intel should just recall there new 200 series, Get back to there roots stop the E core BS and make some true CPU's again.
Otherwise AMD will buy them out some day.
 
This has got to be the longest running unproven narrative without a single shred of evidence. People used to use this excuse back when Intel was paying OEMs to not buy AMD and it propagated because back then because AMD was in fact very small. It's the classic "nugget of truth used to bastardize the whole" type misinformation, it takes a true observation (AMD was small) and uses it to come to a completely unfounded conclusion.

It didn't make much sense back then and it makes zero sense today given how big AMD is now. You are implying that the barrier keeping AMD from the OEM market is money yet AMD has been putting out massive outlays as of late in acquisitions and R&D. AMD clearly has the money and it's obvious the problem is not simply a lack of funds.
No, the longest running unproven narrative is all the claims that intel is STILL bribing OEMs, and that is the only reason we dont have AMD everywhere.

AMD themselves have admitted to shifting priority to EPYC chiplets to increase profits, so it has more evidence then whatever other excuses you guys come up with to explain current evets.
 
Imagine telling someone 10 years ago that Intel would be struggling for life and AMD would be dominating the market (in terms of mindshare and having an actual future as a company) and just visualize the absolute hysteria that would ensue.
 
That'd depend on Radeon getting on par with GeForce, not happening anytime soon unfortunately.
I won't take the merit out of Intel on laptops though, their mobile parts are actually damn good. I still with there'd be AMD options, though, especially out of the USA.

The only thing they need to do is to make a 2 nm pipe cleaner - 200 mm^2 GPU that is sold for around 250$. Game over for Nvidia.
 
So you are saying Intel has nowhere to go but up?
 
So you are saying Intel has nowhere to go but up?
If they don't innovate they will suffer the fate of IBM. Their hubris killed them too. Selling CPUs that are slower than the last generation for what they offer and then competing on price with AMD in stores is plain daft. Even on YT live streamers struggle to even justify Intel for purchase now. They need a $250 monster that will make people forget how much they have been trounced by the competition in CPU space.
 
Does not surprise me since AMD does not Build this P-core E-core crap. Weaktel might claim they have 24 Core but its really no 24 core. It's 8 core Performance which is the only ones that count and the E core is lame because no game uses them. Amd 16 core Pure performance will always beat out 8 core. Weaktel cannot understand that.

I think intel should just recall there new 200 series, Get back to there roots stop the E core BS and make some true CPU's again.
Otherwise AMD will buy them out some day.
That was a significant reason I did not go down the Intel route this year, that & the short life socket platforms killed them for me.
 
Otherwise AMD will buy them out some day.
Given how good Apple's M4 is, I would love for intel to die, AMD buying them and then concentrate in fighting Ngreedia and ARM.

That said, the rumors persist in AMD unveiling their CPU's using ARM cores next year.
 
I'm left wondering why we never got these types of articles when Intel was on top :rolleyes:
 
Meanwhile the regular Ryzen 9000 CPUs are nowhere to be seen...

And surprising the 5500 is a top CPU. Really not much cheaper than a 5600X.
 
Imagine if AMD would launch an RTX 5090 killer for 30% or less than nGreedia's top tier....
 
It is good to see AMD doing well. AMD supporting sockets for a long time seems to be helping. I think a lot of people are doing budget upgrades to things like the 5700X, which is quite a good CPU for the price, and keeping their motherboard.
 
Imagine if AMD would launch an RTX 5090 killer for 30% or less than nGreedia's top tier....
The problem is that everyone has been brainwashed by the influencers that keep saying all AMD gpus are trash and the sheep wont buy any GPUs from AMD, regardless of how good they really are.

Hell, the only reason that many wants AMD to release a 90 class gpu is with the hope that Ngreedia is forced to lower their prices, so the sheep will end up buying more Ngreedia gpus.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top