NVIDIA Grabs Market Share, AMD Loses Ground, and Intel Disappears in Latest dGPU Update

[Tomorrow]

Why did you turn this into "you"? Nobody cares my man. You don't represent the whole market. People buy new gpus to play the heavy games, not the games their old gpu could play. Plenty of those heavy AAA games have RT or PT.

https://steamdb.info/charts/

Very few of current TOP 100 most played games released this year. From 2024 there are a few games and from 2023 there are few games.
People overwhelmingly play old games. Only 4 of those games have RT. Only one has PT.

Another one of your lies exposed. Most people dont buy expensive cards. Most people dont buy or play RT/PT games.
No matter how much you try and show like they do and thus justify Nvidia's prices and features.

Well you just met one. I prefer nvidias old control panel over both nvidias new and amd adrenaline

Of course you do. Weren't you the one that just above that wrote "you dont represent the whole market"?
There are people who prefer XP too but they are statistically insignificant.
I used that old control panel for years and i dont miss it one bit. Good riddance. Nvidia agrees, or they would have not made the Nvidia App to eventually replace it.

Nvidia also properly justified it. You weren't convinced by nvidia but was convinced about amd cause of inherent bias. You are not supposed to do anything, im just calling you out on your really ironic statement about being afraid youll be cut off some new nvidia technology, when that's exactly what AMD just did. Not to mention their driver support which is horrendous cutting off support for stuff that's still ON the market sold as brand new (the whole vega igpu lineup, lol!).

Nvidia just said "trust me bro". Problem is that i dont. And like i said modders, AMD and third party developers proved that Nvidia was full of it when they claimed their new fancy features wouldn't work on their old cards. If 3rd party developers were able to get those features working properly then Nvidia as the maker of the hardware could have done an even better job. They just dint want to. That's it. Don't try to justify it.
AMD said plain and simple. RDNA 3 lacks necessary hardware to properly run FSR 4. That's it. The only one biased here is you.

AMD has done this ONCE. And i didn't lose anything with it as i already went straight to RDNA 4. Until such time that UDNA releases and AMD arbitrarily restricts something to UDNA i can base my opinion only on what HAS happened to me. AMD has not screwed me over yet. Thus i cannot condemn them for something they MIGHT do in the future. Nvidia already HAS screwed me over. Thus there's nothing ironic about my statement.

And you seem to be parroting the whole driver cutoff thing i see everywhere. People parroting this lie dont even bother checking a simple website to verify if it's true or not or when were the cards that still receive updates released and when were the cards no longer receiving updates released.
So let me educate you:

All of RX 5000, 6000, 7000 and 9000 series are on the latest release 25.6.1. This included cards released in the past 5 years.
RX Vega received it's last update just last month. Including iGPU's such as 2200G from 7 years ago. 25.5.1. dGPU's from 8 years ago.
RX 400/500 series dGPU's received it's latest update last month. 25.5.1. These cards were released 9 years ago.
Only the ancient R9 300 series and HD 7000 series no longer receive driver updates. At least under Windows because on Linux such as Ubuntu 64bit the latest driver is from last month. These cards are 10 and 13 years old respectively.

Perhaps next time do a quick search before parroting nonsense you have heard from other Nvidia fanboys on the internet.
Here's the link: https://www.amd.com/en/support/download/drivers.html

And like what goddamn difference does it make whether or not it's justified? Say FSR 5 doesn't work on your 9070xt for some justified reason, so freaking what? You still got the short end of the stick. They started developing a technology that couldn't work on their brand new RDNA 3 cards that costs upwards of 1.1k$ but it's all cool, no biggie, lol

You seem to have crystal ball or balls based on this astute prediction. You're talking about something that MIGHT happen. Im talking about something that HAS happened. Your whole argument boils down to "but, but AMD has done this once and they might do it again".

I'll link it, it has over 1.2k comments, but it won't change your mind anyways.

https://www.reddit.com/r/AMDHelp/comments/1j6ksd1/megathread_rx_9070_xt_black_screen_freezing_issues

I see. It was at AMDHelp. Not AMD. No wonder i count find it.

3 months and 1,1k posts. I doubt all most are unique driver issues and 1,1k for all the 9070 cards sold is till a pretty low number. This includes reported issues that have nothing to do with drivers such as DOA cards, motherboard compatibility and PSU related issues.

Im pretty sure single retailers sold more 9070 cards on day one than that.
Looking at Nvidia subreddit a single driver release gets more comments and i doubt most of these are driver issues either.

 

[Hecate91]

Now you jump back to 2018 again. Make up your mind. You're arguing that most people buy expensive GPU's based on one model sample, from one generation. When i proved your initial assertion wrong you started with this XTX talk. No. Most people dont buy expensive GPU's.
End of discussion.

Exactly, people buying expensive GPU's are a niche within the niche of PC gaming, and it's why AMD didn't attempt at selling a high end GPU with the 9000 series. There are rumors going around, but I doubt AMD would have a rumored 9080XT.

No they dont. Very few games have PT. Yes more games have RT but even that is not universal.
You are also wrong on why i buy a new GPU. It is exactly to play every game. Even the ones that worked on my old card.
The handful on newer and heavier games worked on my old card. Just at 1440p 60. I wanted 1440p 120 and i got that with my new card.
I didn't buy this card for RT or much less PT (it would have been the same if i bought Nvidia). Not even for upscaling. I bought it because i wanted higher framerates in all games. I wanted near 100% perf increase over my old card and i wanted more VRAM. And i wanted it it cheaper than the 900€ Nvidia was offering at the time.

Well now that AMD cards have significantly improved on RT and upscaling, the Nvidia fans have moved the goalposts to PT, even though PT is only achievable without needing upscaling and MFG on a $3000+ GPU.
I don't understand why anyone would even care about PT, not when RT isn't extensively adapted besides a handfull of games with forced RT.

I dont know anyone who has used AMD and that prefers Nvidia's control panel after that. The difference in price is also not a preference. It's reality.

I used Nvidia GPU's for years, felt I got burned on 8GB of VRAM back in 2023 with a 3070Ti, it's funny people are still arguing over 8GB being enough, but I think the AMD andrenalin panel is better, no need for extra software. Price/performance is better with AMD cards as well, not everyone cares about Nvidia features either.

To start, JHH leads Nvidia, he isn't Nvidia. But let's say he has full control over all NV activities at every level. I find it highly unlikely that if the prospect of that activity even made it to his desk that he'd sign off on it. What reason would he have? Nvidia gets paid the same no matter where the cards end up, and the potential PR black eye just isn't worth it. NV's not shipping the cards out anyway: The AIB is, and I'd put money down that the bag swap starts and ends with them.

JHH claimed that no cards were going to China, even though obviously that that isn't the case. Nvidia would get paid even more from those who want full 5090's buying them through back channels, and Nvidia supplies the AIB's with dies and VRAM so they are complicit in the card smuggling and know where cards are going. Then again Nvidia has the valuation of several countries entire GDP, so any legal punishment would be a slap on the wrist.

 

[JustBenching]

https://steamdb.info/charts/

Very few of current TOP 100 most played games released this year. From 2024 there are a few games and from 2023 there are few games.
People overwhelmingly play old games. Only 4 of those games have RT. Only one has PT.

Another one of your lies exposed. Most people dont buy expensive cards. Most people dont buy or play RT/PT games.
No matter how much you try and show like they do and thus justify Nvidia's prices and features.

My lies exposed? You are posting a steam list of games that can be played with a 10 year old 1060 maxed out as proof that gamers don't buy high end cards for RT, as if they are buying new cards to play cs, dota 2, bango cat, banana. Wtf...

Im playing dota 2 as well, but I didn't buy a 4090 because of dota 2, can play that with my 1060 that I have somewhere sitting on the shelf...

Nvidia just said "trust me bro". Problem is that i dont. And like i said modders, AMD and third party developers proved that Nvidia was full of it when they claimed their new fancy features wouldn't work on their old cards. If 3rd party developers were able to get those features working properly then Nvidia as the maker of the hardware could have done an even better job. They just dint want to. That's it. Don't try to justify it.
AMD said plain and simple. RDNA 3 lacks necessary hardware to properly run FSR 4. That's it. The only one biased here is you.

AMD has done this ONCE. And i didn't lose anything with it as i already went straight to RDNA 4. Until such time that UDNA releases and AMD arbitrarily restricts something to UDNA i can base my opinion only on what HAS happened to me. AMD has not screwed me over yet. Thus i cannot condemn them for something they MIGHT do in the future. Nvidia already HAS screwed me over. Thus there's nothing ironic about my statement.

What kind of reasoning is that? So because you weren't personally affected cause you didn't buy RDNA 3 - how will that change the fact that amd might not give you an RDNA 5 feature? I can't even follow your logic here, if there is any. Using your argument, I wasn't affected by nvidia not giving FG to ampere so...? They haven't done anything to you yet cause you didn't have an RDNA 3 card, they did something to everyone that had. Your argument is completely irrational.

When you say nvidia will cut off a next generation feature from their current cards because it happened before you are using the past to predict the future (which is perfectly fine). But using the same damn methodology - amd will also cut off a next gen feature from their current cards just like they did with FSR4. How are you not getting this, lol

So let me educate you:

You better educate yourself first, vega and polaris only get security updates, not performance and game optimization drivers. It's on the maintenance line. They have been on the maintenance line for 2 years now. We are talking about products they sell right NOW, as we speak, brand new. But yeah, thanks for your education bro.

You seem to have crystal ball or balls based on this astute prediction. You're talking about something that MIGHT happen. Im talking about something that HAS happened. Your whole argument boils down to "but, but AMD has done this once and they might do it again".

Im also talking about something that HAS happened. FSR4 was cut off from RDNA 3. On my planet, it happened. Im not sure about yours.

Looking at Nvidia subreddit a single driver release gets more comments and i doubt most of these are driver issues either.

Uhm, obviously, because there are x12 more nvidia users, lol

 

[Tomorrow]

When you say nvidia will cut off a next generation feature from their current cards because it happened before you are using the past to predict the future (which is perfectly fine). But using the same damn methodology - amd will also cut off a next gen feature from their current cards just like they did with FSR4. How are you not getting this, lol

Im basing this on the fact that Nvidia has done this 3 times in a row. That's a pattern. Unless they explicitly state they wont do that again im going to assume the pattern will continue. AMD has done this once and for good reason. One occurrence is not enough for me to conclude that it will keep happening. If they do this again i will change my opinion.

You better educate yourself first, vega and polaris only get security updates, not performance and game optimization drivers. It's on the maintenance line. They have been on the maintenance line for 2 years now. We are talking about products they sell right NOW, as we speak, brand new. But yeah, thanks for your education bro.

And is Nvidia better? You think that because they still support Maxwell from 2015 that it receives game optimizations?
Also you said "cutting off support". Now that i proved that the last driver is only a month old you move the goal posts and whine about lack of game optimizations. As if there's a whole lot to optimize or improve on an 8 year old GPU architecture. And if there were game optimizations you would say that it's a month out of date etc. Just take the L and stop spreading FUD.

Im also talking about something that HAS happened. FSR4 was cut off from RDNA 3. On my planet, it happened. Im not sure about yours.

You're talking about RDNA 5 which none of us knows anything about. And you're basing this on the fact that it happened with RDNA 4 once.

 

[igormp]

Itt: green fanboys vs red fanboys trying to defend their beloved companies while attacking the other "team".
Meanwhile both companies do not give a shit about either of them while racking record profits year over year

 

[Craptacular]

And nothing will change, since amd is already copying whatever nvidia is doing, them pulling out of the gpu market will have less than 0 impact. Just - they need to make sure they close the door on their way out, aight?


Just FYI, and I know no one has brought it up before even though we keep getting pestered about ngreedias drivers - it's time we put a stop to this nonsense. Here you go, a 1.2k+ comments megathread will lots of issues on the 9070 and 9070xt. And let's be clear here, with a tiny 8% marketshare and just 2 GPU models available, the mere existence of a giant giga mega thread should put an end to this whole debate. But yeah, nvidias drivers are bad man

https://www.reddit.com/r/AMDHelp/comments/1j6ksd1/megathread_rx_9070_xt_black_screen_freezing_issues

Who is "we" in the we keep getting pestered about nvidia drivers? Do you work for Nvidia?

If you want a mega thread for nvidia you got one for the melting cables:

https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/1inpox7/rtx_50_series_12vhpwr_megathread

Here is an nvidia megathread with hundreds of comments about the latest drivers:

https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/1l2o80a/geforce_hotfix_display_driver_version_57666

I have no real dog in this fight but I don't understand either side in downplaying the respective side issues?

 

[Rover4444]

Not surprising to see people still bought rtx 50 series cards despite all of the issues such as melting connectors, missing rops, and multiple driver updates causing black screens and crashes. The mindshare, marketing, and brand recognition are powerful enough to convince consumers to buy overpriced cards regardless of the problems.
And the gaming market is so screwed when people will empty their wallet for the leather jacket man no matter what, AMD cutting prices has never worked to outsell the competition.

Had to do it. The AI performance was just too good and the 9070s that are in stock are so over MSRP that it makes NVIDIA look like a bargain.

I don't even believe this. There is no way Nvidia is outselling AMD in 2025. However they are measuring this data it must be wrong. No one wants the 5070 and 5070ti at these prices and even your average pc dumbass knows bad value and at least delays buying a new pc for half a year or a year.

AMD hasn't had anything available under $550 for months now, of course NVIDIA is outselling them. AMD isn't even close to their MSRP either.

Itt: green fanboys vs red fanboys trying to defend their beloved companies while attacking the other "team".
Meanwhile both companies do not give a shit about either of them while racking record profits year over year

Blue fanboys getting forgotten about yet again

 

[JustBenching]

Im basing this on the fact that Nvidia has done this 3 times in a row. That's a pattern. Unless they explicitly state they wont do that again im going to assume the pattern will continue. AMD has done this once and for good reason. One occurrence is not enough for me to conclude that it will keep happening. If they do this again i will change my opinion.

DLSS 4 works on 2018 gpus. That's all I got to say in the matter

And is Nvidia better? You think that because they still support Maxwell from 2015 that it receives game optimizations?
Also you said "cutting off support". Now that i proved that the last driver is only a month old you move the goal posts and whine about lack of game optimizations. As if there's a whole lot to optimize or improve on an 8 year old GPU architecture. And if there were game optimizations you would say that it's a month out of date etc. Just take the L and stop spreading FUD.

Yes, nvidia is much better. Last time I checked they aren't selling maxwell chips while cutting off support like amd does. Take the L and stop spreading FUD (why do you have to turn a conversation into a toxic cesspool is beyond me).

IYou're talking about RDNA 5 which none of us knows anything about. And you're basing this on the fact that it happened with RDNA 4 once.

Exactly, none of us knows nothing about it, buying a gpu cause you think you want get cut off from something you know nothing about is crazy.

I have no real dog in this fight but I don't understand either side in downplaying the respective side issues?

That's the opposite of what im doing. Im not downplaying anyside. Im seeing the amd side for whatever reason overexaggerate the nvidia issues while ignoring the amd ones, just because they bought an amd gpu and try to defend their purchase beyond any logic or rationality.

 

[Bwaze]

Jon Peddie Research (JPR) numbers are still more estimates than hard sales numbers.

But yes, everything else agrees with them - AMD is apparently so focussed on server CPUs that they can’t even completely dominate PC CPU market, despite the Intel’s blunders - they simply can’t make CPUs fast enough, so the prices remain unappealingly high. And in GPU they are fighting an uphill battle - Nvidia has basically become industry standard. Even if AMD somehow lost their fabrication constraints, they would first focus elsewhere.

 

[Tomorrow]

DLSS 4 works on 2018 gpus. That's all I got to say in the matter

Like i said before. Doing one thing right does not make up for doing many things wrong.

Yes, nvidia is much better. Last time I checked they aren't selling maxwell chips while cutting off support like amd does. Take the L and stop spreading FUD (why do you have to turn a conversation into a toxic cesspool is beyond me).

So in your eyes Nvidia is much better only because they dont sell these products that dont receive game optimizations?
Is that supposed to make the owners of those products feel better or what?

And to be clear. List the products you claim AMD still sells with Vega because as far as i can see everything they sell now in 2025 has some form of at least RDNA 2 (like Steam Deck. PS5 etc) in it. The best i could find were 3 old Pro series dGPU's based on Radeon VII and ultra low end 200GE, 2200G, 3000G, 3200G and 3400G CPU's. None of these are new products. They're old stock and no one in their right mind should buy these new as there are much better options available now.

Exactly, none of us knows nothing about it, buying a gpu cause you think you want get cut off from something you know nothing about is crazy.

Yeah go figure. Basing my current purchasing decision on what as happened in the past. If company screws over their buyers 3 times in a row i should just trust them no to do it the 4th time because...?

That's the opposite of what im doing. Im not downplaying anyside. Im seeing the amd side for whatever reason overexaggerate the nvidia issues while ignoring the amd ones, just because they bought an amd gpu and try to defend their purchase beyond any logic or rationality.

Says the guy claiming massive issues with 9070 cards and linking a thread that has 1,1k responses in 3 months (not all of them even driver issues).
AMD has likely sold over 100k of 9070 series cards. If 1000 people are having driver problems then that's 1% which is in line with usual consumer electronics of 2-3%.

If 9070 issues are so prevalent and AMD drivers are so bad then why hasn't anyone made a video about it? They have made videos about 50 series issues including drivers. I checked Youtube. Even framechasers who has historically been very critical of AMD and who coined the term "AMDip" gave 9070 XT drivers a fairly positive review.

Im not ignoring AMD issues. That is if i knew what those issues were exactly because so far I've seen only "AMD drivers bad" that lacks anything specific. Like i said before, with 9070 XT included i have now owned equal number of Nvidia and AMD cards. I was on Nvidia for the past 9 years from 2016 to 2025. I didn't defend Nvidia then and im not defending AMD now just because i bought their card.

This generation im seeing far more Nvidia expats moving to AMD. I suppose i could be considered as one. For many it's their first AMD card. I wonder why that is? Maybe they had had enough of Nvidia's BS?

Some videos for context:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbFj-payXkU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XT7sCquB1ME

 

[JustBenching]

Like i said before. Doing one thing right does not make up for doing many things wrong.

Exactly. So AMD doing one thing right doesn't mean that's ok for FSR 4 not working on 1k+ flagships.

So in your eyes Nvidia is much better only because they dont sell these products that dont receive game optimizations?
Is that supposed to make the owners of those products feel better or what?

Owners of these products had many years of driver support.

And to be clear. List the products you claim AMD still sells with Vega because as far as i can see everything they sell now in 2025 has some form of at least RDNA 2 (like Steam Deck. PS5 etc) in it. The best i could find were 3 old Pro series dGPU's based on Radeon VII and ultra low end 200GE, 2200G, 3000G, 3200G and 3400G CPU's. None of these are new products. They're old stock and no one in their right mind should buy these new as there are much better options available now.

Lots of products that have released in 2023 and 2024. Easy example, the whole Barcelo-R lineup is made of vega igpus. 7330u for example - they even name as they are brand new lol.

I own 2 of these products with vega graphics btw.

Yeah go figure. Basing my current purchasing decision on what as happened in the past. If company screws over their buyers 3 times in a row i should just trust them no to do it the 4th time because...?

But so did the guy that bought the 5070ti. He likes upscaling so he is afraid amd will cut off FSR 5 from the 9070xt while nvidia has a much better track record of not doing that,since DLSS4 is supported by 2018 gpus.

Says the guy claiming massive issues with 9070 cards and linking a thread that has 1,1k responses in 3 months (not all of them even driver issues).
AMD has likely sold over 100k of 9070 series cards. If 1000 people are having driver problems then that's 1% which is in line with usual consumer electronics of 2-3%.

And what % do you think have driver issues with nvidia? You are having double standards here.

If 9070 issues are so prevalent and AMD drivers are so bad then why hasn't anyone made a video about it? They have made videos about 50 series issues including drivers. I checked Youtube. Even framechasers who has historically been very critical of AMD and who coined the term "AMDip" gave 9070 XT drivers a fairly positive review.

Cause they have 8% of the market. Also because it's just monday. AMD having severe driver issues isn't something that will make news, it's something expected. Nvidia not having good drivers is something out of the blue. The videos you posted yourself prove it just by reading the titles. "Bulletproof reputation". There you have it.

This generation im seeing far more Nvidia expats moving to AMD. I suppose i could be considered as one. For many it's their first AMD card. I wonder why that is? Maybe they had had enough of Nvidia's BS?

Sadly marketshare says a different story, it keeps on dropping.

But im out of this discussion, it lacks any kind of rationality, have the last word.

 

[Tomorrow]

I have nothing more to add. It's like talking to a green wall. Hopefully others reading these posts saw that i tried to counter generalized false statements with facts and numbers and they learned something from these posts.

 

[Event Horizon]

I have nothing more to add. It's like talking to a green wall. Hopefully others reading these posts saw that i tried to counter generalized false statements with facts and numbers and they learned something from these posts.

I suppose it's inconceivable to some that you (and many others) would dare to try the competition and actually have a good experience.

Things will get interesting if the AI bubble bursts, massively freeing up supply in the discrete GPU market, but that is unlikely to happen anytime soon.

 

[Onasi]

I suppose it's inconceivable to some that you (and many others) would dare to try the competition and actually have a good experience.

Both vendors provide perfectly fine GPU experiences. Even Intel, after initial teething pains, is absolutely usable. Any discussion about preferring one driver suite over the other is peak subjective analysis. People get into arguments that are not actually relevant to the topic at hand, which is NV near monopoly levels of market share. There is more to this than just one side having the (almost memetic at this point) “better drivers” or anything having to do with RT/PT. It’s just a fairly simple fact that once you lose market share and play catch up it’s ENORMOUSLY difficult to recover that loss. We’ve seen it before in many, many markets. Hell, even for AMD themselves they are still not leading the CPU market, not even close, despite the fact that, unlike GPUs, their products ARE dominant there in terms of objective qualities. So it is with GPUs - it’s all very fine and good that RDNA 4 is a good series with almost feature parity to NV and offered at a reasonable-ish price. That by itself absolutely won’t move the needle after almost a decade of fucking up.

 

[Launcestonian]

Brand loyalty or marketing.



Your argument is not valid.

I played for several years "star conflict" with the gnu userspace and linux kernel and never saw that steam survey. I also played a bit in windows star conflict and never saw that survey.

I'm one of the few older pc players who have never spend 5 €, 5 us dolla or 5 canadian bever bucks on steam. Maybe that's why i am not able to vote in the past. Fanatical or whatever that site is called gives away regulary games but I am not allowed to have one, because I never spend any cash on it.

I saw the steam survey first time a few weeks ago with my 4th refurbished notebook with windows 11 pro. I just download games on that box but I never played, but I got the steam survey. Makes sense, right?

No, my statement is valid with the most popular OS in the world (Windows 10+11) & Steam app with games installed in it.

 

[Vayra86]

Elon Musk bought 200,000 5090s for his AI. That is a ton of cards. The D series is created so official sales can go to China and Nvidia has no problem filling the rest of South East Asia with cards for that purpose. It is so insane that PC World did a "Live" event at the newest Microcenter in Santa Clara. They made sure every they got on camera was looking for the same thing a 5090 Founders Edition.

It is too bad though because this propaganda has made talking about PC Gaming desultory. It is to the point where people actual believe that the 4090 and 5090 are the only cards that can do 4K. Of course that is total hog wash and my monitor is 4K but I can post my average FPS and they will still call me a liar.

I don't know what strange twilight bubble you're living in, but people 'believing there are only 4090 and 5090s that can game proper' while they know jack shit about gaming at the same time, simply doesn't make a sliver of sense. Those people aren't in the market for gaming GPUs to begin with either

Lay off the whatever it is you're using bro

 

[JustBenching]

I don't know what strange twilight bubble you're living in, but people 'believing there are only 4090 and 5090s that can game proper' while they know jack shit about gaming at the same time, simply doesn't make a sliver of sense. Those people aren't in the market for gaming GPUs to begin with either

Lay off the whatever it is you're using bro

Im gaming at 4k with my laptops 6700S. Well not maxed out obviously, and I rely heavily on FSR, but it can get stuff done.

The individual is the one that claimed he is getting 160 fps in spiderman 2 maxed out and was frustrated when I told him he can't.

Thread '[TT] AMD rumored Radeon RX 9080 XT: up to 32GB of faster GDDR7, up to 4GHz GPU clocks, 450W power'

May 31, 2025

https://www.tweaktown.com/news/105554/amd-rumored-radeon-rx-9080-xt-up-to-32gb-of-faster-gddr7-4ghz-gpu-clocks-450w-power/index.html

TL;DR: AMD is reportedly developing the Radeon RX 9080 XT, an RDNA 4-based enthusiast graphics card featuring up to 32GB of GDDR7 memory and GPU clocks reaching 4.0GHz. It promises 15-40% better gaming performance than the RX 9070 XT, potentially outperforming NVIDIA’s RTX 5080 and rivaling the RTX 5080 SUPER.

if I can get this on launch day at MSRP I probably will do it. microcenter don't fail me now!

AMD, THE WAY WE PLAY :rockout...

• Space Lynx
• Replies: 179
• Forum: AMD / ATI GPUs

• 
• 

 

[blinnbanir]

I don't know what strange twilight bubble you're living in, but people 'believing there are only 4090 and 5090s that can game proper' while they know jack shit about gaming at the same time, simply doesn't make a sliver of sense. Those people aren't in the market for gaming GPUs to begin with either

Lay off the whatever it is you're using bro

I have seen plenty of comments on this very site claiming that the 4090 and 5090 are the only cards that can do 4K. I am using a 4K screen and do not have a 4090/5090 so obviously I do not believe it,

Im gaming at 4k with my laptops 6700S. Well not maxed out obviously, and I rely heavily on FSR, but it can get stuff done.

The individual is the one that claimed he is getting 160 fps in spiderman 2 maxed out and was frustrated when I told him he can't.

Thread '[TT] AMD rumored Radeon RX 9080 XT: up to 32GB of faster GDDR7, up to 4GHz GPU clocks, 450W power'

May 31, 2025

https://www.tweaktown.com/news/105554/amd-rumored-radeon-rx-9080-xt-up-to-32gb-of-faster-gddr7-4ghz-gpu-clocks-450w-power/index.html

TL;DR: AMD is reportedly developing the Radeon RX 9080 XT, an RDNA 4-based enthusiast graphics card featuring up to 32GB of GDDR7 memory and GPU clocks reaching 4.0GHz. It promises 15-40% better gaming performance than the RX 9070 XT, potentially outperforming NVIDIA’s RTX 5080 and rivaling the RTX 5080 SUPER.

if I can get this on launch day at MSRP I probably will do it. microcenter don't fail me now!

AMD, THE WAY WE PLAY :rockout...

• Space Lynx
• Replies: 179
• Forum: AMD / ATI GPUs

• 
• 

As I said before why don't you ask AMD why I get 160 FPS average in Spiderman 2. I was not frustrated just bemused that you claimed to know more about my PC than me.

 

[JustBenching]

As I said before why don't you ask AMD why I get 160 FPS average in Spiderman 2. I was not frustrated just bemused that you claimed to know more about my PC than me.

Well if you are claiming you are 160 fps in spiderman 2 maxed out then yeah, i know more about your PC than you.

Let's ask @W1zzard , how many fps does a 7900xt get @ 4k maxed out in spiderman 2 with RT? In your review of the game you have it at 26 fps

Spider-Man 2 Performance Benchmark Review - 35 GPUs Tested

Spider-Man 2 has arrived for the PC Platform. Sony's newest port offers fantastic super hero gameplay, but is plagued by instability issues and crashes. Once you get it to run stable, performance is pretty decent though, and all the major technologies are supported. In our performance review...

www.techpowerup.com

 

[Rover4444]

I have seen plenty of comments on this very site claiming that the 4090 and 5090 are the only cards that can do 4K. I am using a 4K screen and do not have a 4090/5090 so obviously I do not believe it,

Hardware shills, very sad. Same people will say the 5060 Ti is a 1080p card, and not because of low VRAM.

 

[blinnbanir]

Well if you are claiming you are 160 fps in spiderman 2 maxed out then yeah, i know more about your PC than you.

Let's ask @W1zzard , how many fps does a 7900xt get @ 4k maxed out in spiderman 2 with RT? In your review of the game you have it at 26 fps

Spider-Man 2 Performance Benchmark Review - 35 GPUs Tested

Spider-Man 2 has arrived for the PC Platform. Sony's newest port offers fantastic super hero gameplay, but is plagued by instability issues and crashes. Once you get it to run stable, performance is pretty decent though, and all the major technologies are supported. In our performance review...

www.techpowerup.com

You have wasted so much energy with this argument. It does not matter I will enjoy my PC and you can enjoy yours. You think that because the Screenshot that I took and posted to you was Doctored to show 160 FPS? If you claim to know more than me then ask yourself if Wizzard used AMD software to get his numbers.

 

[JustBenching]

You have wasted so much energy with this argument. It does not matter I will enjoy my PC and you can enjoy yours. You think that because the Screenshot that I took and posted to you was Doctored to show 160 FPS? If you claim to know more than me then ask yourself if Wizzard used AMD software to get his numbers.

Yeah it's quite well known that using adrenaline to capture fps boosts performance by 600%

 

[Rover4444]

You have wasted so much energy with this argument. It does not matter I will enjoy my PC and you can enjoy yours. You think that because the Screenshot that I took and posted to you was Doctored to show 160 FPS? If you claim to know more than me then ask yourself if Wizzard used AMD software to get his numbers.

160 is a stretch actually, yeah. You sure you have the right game? Mind posting settings?

 

[Dr. Dro]

Hardware shills, very sad. Same people will say the 5060 Ti is a 1080p card, and not because of low VRAM.

To be real with ya. The 5090 is a 1080p card, if you wanna go full blast pathtracing at native res

 

[blinnbanir]

160 is a stretch actually, yeah. You sure you have the right game? Mind posting settings?