• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Intel Readies Core 5 120F Socket LGA1700 Processor

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,810 (7.40/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Intel is breathing new life into the Socket LGA1700 platform by giving it its fourth processor model generation, under the Core 100-series branding. These chips are based on the "Bartlett Lake-S" microarchitecture, but are designed to capture value price points. The main target of these chips are the gaming PC crowd. "Bartlett Lake-S" is a derivative of "Raptor Lake" but with the E-core clusters physically absent, and the chips only having "Raptor Cove" P-cores. A marketing slide for a new entry-level chip came to light, the Core 5 120F.

The Intel Core 5 120F is probably being designed for a sub-$150 price-point. The company's marketing material makes it abundantly clear that gamers that want maxed out 1080p AAA gaming experiences are the target audience of this chip. Core 5 120F comes with a 6-core/12-thread CPU, with six "Raptor Cove" P-cores, and no E-cores. The company didn't specify L2 cache size, but these are likely 1.25 MB per core. The six cores share an 18 MB L3 cache. It's highly likely that this particular silicon is physically similar to the "Alder Lake" H0 die, which also lacks any E-core clusters, physically only has six P-cores, and an 18 MB L3 cache. The Core 5 120F ticks at 2.50 GHz base frequency, with a 4.50 GHz maximum boost. It features a 2-channel DDR5 memory interface, supporting DDR5-4800 native memory speed, with support for up to 192 GB memory. The chip comes with 65 W processor base power.



Intel is also giving finishing touches to a large new monolithic silicon under the "Bartlett Lake-S" series, which physically has 12 "Raptor Cove" P-cores, each with 2 MB of L2 cache, no E-core clusters, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a classic multicore processor with 12-core/24-thread configuration purely with P-cores, and Intel will look to give it gaming performance that at least matches the Core i9-14900KS. The lure of 12 P-cores on a common CPU complex sharing an L3 cache, could attract gamers to the chip.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source
 
Finally Intel has just relized E Cores are very stupid and actually their whole LGA 1851 platform. Hope will be overclockable processor with Asus B660-F and will have unlockable SA voltage.
 
... and here I thought eSports was the only gaming segment that really benefits from top-tier CPU's.
 
Would this be similar to the recently announced 5500X3D? I mean, giving life to a previous generation socket to clear more inventory?
 
The rename cpu strategy. This is similar confusing as the ryzen pro 4650u and similar amd notebook processors. Without wikipedia I'm out of luck to determine what's inside

The first thing i check is the cache size, the instruction set and the architecture. Names means nothing these days
 
12400F clears the stock just fine at sub $100. This is an attempt to raise the price to 150. At least shrink it to intel 4 node to justify the 100 series name.
 
I generally don't follow socket names anytime, I just pay attention to what generations are socket-compatible when shoppong for parts. Without this article I would never have known that this CPU would work in an Alder Lake/Raptor Lake board.
 
Without this article I would never have known that this CPU would work in an Alder Lake/Raptor Lake board.
Only after the mandatory bios update.
 
12400F clears the stock just fine at sub $100. This is an attempt to raise the price to 150. At least shrink it to intel 4 node to justify the 100 series name.
Exactly this. This CPU brings NOTHING new to the party.
 
Idk why we make such a big fuss over wattage. 4.5GHz is really not great. Raise the wattage a bit, go faster.
It's just going to get paired with 200-350W GPU.

4790K was 4.4GHz
 
I think I'll wait for this.

1750076541158.png
 
Finally Intel has just relized E Cores are very stupid and actually their whole LGA 1851 platform. Hope will be overclockable processor with Asus B660-F and will have unlockable SA voltage.
E-cores ain't stupid, they allow much more performance per die area. The problem with them is they don't cut it for gaming.

If Intel were to market an actual gaming CPU they woulda gone for something with 12 non-HT blazing fast cores plus some 3DVCache equivalent. But that's a gaming-only CPU, it woulda sucked in working tasks compared to much more efficient E-core models.
 
Would this be similar to the recently announced 5500X3D? I mean, giving life to a previous generation socket to clear more inventory?
Doesn't look like it to me. The 5500X3D is there to offer an even cheaper alternative to the 5600X3D. The 120F is just a massive oddball as it's a hybrid between the 12400F (P-cores, arch, cache) and 13400F (max memory) probably intended to slot in significantly above the 12400F as others have mentioned. This reeks a lot more of deceptive marketing and preying on the unknown. It's more like a 12450F.
 
Finally Intel has just relized E Cores are very stupid and actually their whole LGA 1851 platform. Hope will be overclockable processor with Asus B660-F and will have unlockable SA voltage.

???

There is nothing wrong with E-cores. And the lack of a K designation makes it clear the processor is locked.

wow Cpu without stinky E-Cores. What next, they gonna invent bigger l3 cache?

This is literally another i5-12400F re-release...

Doesn't look like it to me. The 5500X3D is there to offer an even cheaper alternative to the 5600X3D. The 120F is just a massive oddball as it's a hybrid between the 12400F (P-cores, arch, cache) and 13400F (max memory) probably intended to slot in significantly above the 12400F as others have mentioned. This reeks a lot more of deceptive marketing and preying on the unknown. It's more like a 12450F.

No physical changes from 12400F if alleged specs hold, but the 5500X3D is exclusive to Latam market and the 5600X3D was never available here
 
If it at least has more cache than the 12400F, it could mean something. But I wouldn't bet on it.
Does the market really need something between the 12400F and the 13/14400F, though?
 
No physical changes from 12400F if alleged specs hold, but the 5500X3D is exclusive to Latam market and the 5600X3D was never available here

I haven't finished reading up on Bartlett Lake yet but from what I have read that is not entirely true. It has HDMI 2.1 off the CPU, which is a characteristic of Raptor Lake not Alder Lake. Also certified for DDR5-5600 which is RPL not ADL.

P-Cores are all +200Mhz vs RPL.

So the interesting part here for most on LGA 1700 would be the possible 12P 0E chip.

1750081956576.png
 
Last edited:
I haven't finished reading up on Bartlett Lake yet but from what I have read that is not entirely true. It has HDMI 2.1 off the CPU, which is a characteristic of Raptor Lake not Alder Lake. Also certified for DDR5-5600 which is RPL not ADL.

P-Cores are all +200Mhz vs RPL.
That's the odd thing, the specs strongly suggest the 120F is not Raptor Lake. 4800MHz DDR5 and 18MB L3 cache strongly suggest a mildly bumped 12400F Alder Lake chip.
Or perhaps worded properly, it looks like the first leaked product is a refreshed Golden Cove only chip instead of the expected Raptor Cove.
The others probably are proper Raptor chips, not the 120F based on leaks however.
Kinda sad that Intel is still doing this in 2025, Raptor Lake is almost 3 years old by now.

If it at least has more cache than the 12400F, it could mean something. But I wouldn't bet on it.
Does the market really need something between the 12400F and the 13/14400F, though?
No, the price difference is minimal anyways.
As is typical with these products you're better off getting the significantly cheaper product or the slightly more expensive one with some E-cores.
 
Back
Top