- Joined
- Jun 14, 2020
- Messages
- 5,827 (3.12/day)
System Name | Mean machine |
---|---|
Processor | AMD 6900HS |
Memory | 2x16 GB 4800C40 |
Video Card(s) | AMD Radeon 6700S |
So how did we get to "finewine" which traditionally refers to drivers? Come on now man.The point of the video was to take the review data for the 9070 XT and 5070 Ti, and compare that to what we’re getting now, using the same games and settings featured in the review. This gives us a look at how things have progressed after 4 months, are the margins still the same or has one card improved more than the other? I wasn’t the first to notice that for whatever reason the 9070 XT had improved in a number of games. @pcgameshardware first reported a 13% increase in performance for the 9070 XT in Hunt Showdown 1896, 13% in Space Marine 2, 24% for Forza Motorsport, 17% for Indiana Jones and the Great Circle, 23% for Half-Life Ray Traced and 14% for Portal RTX. Outside of that they tested a range of games I didn’t, meaning many of the 16 games I tested weren’t featured in their content, so I was keen to see what changes might be seen in those titles. The gains for the 9070 XT and RDNA 4 series in general aren’t just a result of newer drivers, they’re likely a combination of things, such as game updates, platform updates and perhaps even Windows updates. So a simple driver test where you compare the release driver with the latest driver won’t necessarily show the same gains for all games, as all other updates have already taken place. Just to be clear that wasn’t the purpose of this content, and I think I explained the idea behind the video quite well. As stated in the video the idea was to take the outdated review data for the 9070 XT and 5070 Ti, and compare that to what we’re seeing today. My mistake was focusing on drivers as being the leading cause for the performance gains, which was an assumption on my part.
This is the latest review from computerbase - published yesterday. The 9070xt is barely beating the 4070ti S...
