• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Quad-Core and Triple-Core Phenom Production Schedule

malware

New Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2004
Messages
5,422 (0.72/day)
Location
Bulgaria
Processor Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 G0 VID: 1.2125
Motherboard GIGABYTE GA-P35-DS3P rev.2.0
Cooling Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme + Noctua NF-S12 Fan
Memory 4x1 GB PQI DDR2 PC2-6400
Video Card(s) Colorful iGame Radeon HD 4890 1 GB GDDR5
Storage 2x 500 GB Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 32 MB RAID0
Display(s) BenQ G2400W 24-inch WideScreen LCD
Case Cooler Master COSMOS RC-1000 (sold), Cooler Master HAF-932 (delivered)
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi XtremeMusic + Logitech Z-5500 Digital THX
Power Supply Chieftec CFT-1000G-DF 1kW
Software Laptop: Lenovo 3000 N200 C2DT2310/3GB/120GB/GF7300/15.4"/Razer
HKEPC has posted information about the AMD Phenom product schedule for this fiscal year. Aside from the original Chinese article, the graphics are written in crisp and legible English. All the information you need is there.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
You know, I know it's pretty far fetched, but it'd be cool if those 9150e's were 65W chips...
 
why did they have to make a 50 version? id say just keep the same number scheme. just like when they made venice revisions . no need for new numbers.
 
They want to differentiate the old B2 no-no cores from the new B3 batch.. some people feel better with this.
I must say, i find the naming scheme very close to intel's C2D/C2Q... hell, even the new nvidia parts have a naming scheme similar to past radeons... geforce 9800pro anyone? :)
 
Well, Intel is taking a few pages from AMD and it paid off for them, only right that AMD would do the same. Them tri cores look awesome, however, I wonder if they can take the new DDR1066 memory? If so, I may forgo Quad and get me a tricore on the cheaper :)
 
Maybe the 50 in the new number scheme indicates that those versions are free from the erratum bug? Just a guess.
 
Maybe the 50 in the new number scheme indicates that those versions are free from the erratum bug? Just a guess.


The b3 revisions are intact and erratum free...and sources have stated that they are also more overclockable than the b2s.
 
You know, I know it's pretty far fetched, but it'd be cool if those 9150e's were 65W chips...

Considering they have a 1.8ghz HE version of the barcelona chips and they state a "TDP" of 55W, I'm sure those 9150e's will be 65W, what else would they be? 80W? doesn't really make sense if true. I'd like to see how much they could be undervolted....
 
Can't wait to see what the triple cores can do. Might be a nice cheap upgrade for my AMD back-up rig.
 
...and sources have stated that they are also more overclockable than the b2s.

Obviously, I just thought that was general common sense :p
 
im just wondering should i keep my amd system as my main rig or should i put my core 2 duo in my main setup and place my amd setup as my htpc one...as of right now...i dont know...this is why i havent gone dual gt or dual 3870 yet...i currently own one of each...
 
im just wondering should i keep my amd system as my main rig or should i put my core 2 duo in my main setup and place my amd setup as my htpc one...as of right now...i dont know...this is why i havent gone dual gt or dual 3870 yet...i currently own one of each...

Quad core Intel for main, AMD for back-up/second rig. Like me! :D
 
Q3 2008 sounds way too late for the 9950. Is the Agena FX dead?
 
Back
Top