IHeartMafs
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2020
- Messages
- 2 (0.00/day)
- Location
- Canada
I am currently using the 1usmus ClockTuner for Ryzen v1.0b3. The 'exe file details' show it's date as October 1, 2010.
I am quite happy with the results that I have achieved using this version (which I believe was the initial public release).
I did however try v1.1b3 and although it offered expanded capabilities, I wasn't happy with the constant voltage and clocks, as reported, compared to v1.0b3.
V1.0b3 seemed to act more like (with reporting to match) the system was respecting regular C-States for both variable down-clocks and voltage-reduction.
V1.1b3 seemed to simply act more like a static overclock (for me anyway), with the clocks and voltage pinned at MAX values.
My question (and possible concern) is, should I be looking to continue upgrading to the latest version as it is released ?
OR, can I simply call it a day with v1.0b3, as I am happy with the results and the system is 100% stable under all testing that I have done.
3900x on MSI x570 MEG ACE, Fractal S36 360mm AIO.
1.256v MAX Global CPU Voltage.
Per-CCX Individual Overclocks (all BIOS settings as per usage instructions).
CCX1-152|148|145 (4425 Mhz)
CCX2-156|160|160 (4450 Mhz)
CCX3-130|122|126 (4300 Mhz)
CCX4-141|137|134 (4325 Mhz)
I have done exhaustive testing and the system is stable and runs a max temp of approx. 60c or less, under prolonged full load, with idle temps in the 26c range.
Everything seems to be running as it should. All Voltages reporting as expected. I am satisfied with the performance increase. I am not looking for any other features.
Is there any safety reason to continue chasing and utilizing the most recent release ?
thanks to those who took the time to read and reply.
I am quite happy with the results that I have achieved using this version (which I believe was the initial public release).
I did however try v1.1b3 and although it offered expanded capabilities, I wasn't happy with the constant voltage and clocks, as reported, compared to v1.0b3.
V1.0b3 seemed to act more like (with reporting to match) the system was respecting regular C-States for both variable down-clocks and voltage-reduction.
V1.1b3 seemed to simply act more like a static overclock (for me anyway), with the clocks and voltage pinned at MAX values.
My question (and possible concern) is, should I be looking to continue upgrading to the latest version as it is released ?
OR, can I simply call it a day with v1.0b3, as I am happy with the results and the system is 100% stable under all testing that I have done.
3900x on MSI x570 MEG ACE, Fractal S36 360mm AIO.
1.256v MAX Global CPU Voltage.
Per-CCX Individual Overclocks (all BIOS settings as per usage instructions).
CCX1-152|148|145 (4425 Mhz)
CCX2-156|160|160 (4450 Mhz)
CCX3-130|122|126 (4300 Mhz)
CCX4-141|137|134 (4325 Mhz)
I have done exhaustive testing and the system is stable and runs a max temp of approx. 60c or less, under prolonged full load, with idle temps in the 26c range.
Everything seems to be running as it should. All Voltages reporting as expected. I am satisfied with the performance increase. I am not looking for any other features.
Is there any safety reason to continue chasing and utilizing the most recent release ?
thanks to those who took the time to read and reply.