• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD's Ryzen 5 Processors Already Out in the Wild

Raevenlord

News Editor
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
3,755 (1.18/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name The Ryzening
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard MSI X570 MAG TOMAHAWK
Cooling Lian Li Galahad 360mm AIO
Memory 32 GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3733 (4x 8 GB)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 3070 Ti
Storage Boot: Transcend MTE220S 2TB, Kintson A2000 1TB, Seagate Firewolf Pro 14 TB
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG270UP (1440p 144 Hz IPS)
Case Lian Li O11DX Dynamic White
Audio Device(s) iFi Audio Zen DAC
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ 750 W
Mouse Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Software Windows 10 x64
AMD's Ryzen 5 line-up is arguably the most interesting segment on AMD's product stack, purely from a price/performance point of view. And it would seem that some retailers have jumped the gun on the sales embargo for AMD's (apparently only partially upcoming) Ryzen 5 series of processors. Users around the globe (from Philippines to Brazil that we can confirm right now) have been posting pictures of their newly-arrived Ryzen 5 1600 processors. As such, it is only a matter of time until some non-NDA-constrained benchmarks arise. So hang onto your hats for some 6-core, 12-threads at $219 goodness!



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Does AMD generally not go after distributors/retailers who jump the embargo like this?
 
That R5 1400 looks good to me as long as it can clock to at least 4GHz. The 1600 would come in handy when I do encoding, though.
 
Does AMD generally not go after distributors/retailers who jump the embargo like this?

I can't imagine any company that wouldn't go after distributors/retailers over this. It's a huge launch for AMD and these guys sign an agreement with a likely stiff monetary penalty if they break it. Not to mention being blacklisted from future AMD releases.

My guess is that whoever is doing this are doing it in some way where they thought it can't be traced back to them. I can tell you right now though, I can read the serial number on the top of the processor in the pictures, which means they will be able to track down which distributor and which stores had it.
 
That R5 1400 looks good to me as long as it can clock to at least 4GHz. The 1600 would come in handy when I do encoding, though.

This is my sentiment, the R5 1400 is a great enough value that so long as it overclocks reasonably it should beat Intel's offerings in Perf/$. I've been waiting for a new productivity king, but I think it's going to be a close call here.
 
Does AMD generally not go after distributors/retailers who jump the embargo like this?

I don't think they've disclosed anything which was not already known.

If they would show the CPU running at 4Ghz at 1.2 V or a DDR speed of 3 Ghz ... maybe but those picture don't disclose anything, only known information.
 
Well yeah, but it seems credible that performance can be accurately simulated by deactivating a few things in bios on a full ryzen. will be interesting to see how close these simulated benches were to the real thing now its out.
 
Intuitively, since software for a while yet will be unlikely to busy 8 cores, 6 cores seems a good value buy.

You could swap in a 6 core ryzen v3 down the track a bit, and probably have a better cpu than a current ryzen 7.
 
@msroadkill612 please use multi quote when reply to multiple members, it stops you from creating multiple posts and cluttering up the forum.
 
Back
Top