• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

EK-Vardar EVO 120ER Fan

VSG

Editor, Reviews & News
Staff member
Joined
Jul 1, 2014
Messages
3,726 (0.94/day)
EKWB takes their high static pressure optimized Vardar fans and improves upon them by adding a zero RPM mode to PWM-controlled fans. The dual ball bearings also get replaced to reduce bearing noise, and at $20, these aim to be the best-performing radiator fans for PC DIY watercooling around.

Show full review
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Wait, no temperatures test?

How can we know if this performances well if we cant see temperatures, only noise? I honest dont give a damn about noise.
 
Great review VSG.
 
Temperature is a function of air flow ... more air = more temp reduction making temperature testing redundant. While the air flow is impressive, the noise is a bit high. Tho I would prefer testing on a larger radiator and the fan shroud design can result in varying amounts of blow back between fans. In addition, there are significant variations depending upon fpi. Would be nice to see testing done at low medium and high fpi, unfortunately, this triples the author's time investment. As a user who uses 1250 rpm fans limiting them to 850 max rpm to achieve user non detectable noise levels ... no real interest in 2000 rpm fans.

As for the results ... The cheap warranty and high price is disturbing ... and performance wise,

1250 rpm 31.2 cfm @ 39.9 dbA... that's > just uner 52 w/ 8 fans.

The BeQuite's are 2.6 cfm lower @ 5.7 dbA lower, Id rather have the low noise

The Phantekls lose 4.1 cfm but are 8.1 dbA quieter

If ya need the air flow, and with proper rad sizing, you wouldn't, you can do push / pull for a typical 30% increase air flow increase while expeiencing only 3 dbA extra in noise.

Still, higher air flow fans do have their place in small builds where users wear headphones or do't mind the noise.
 
Temperature is a function of air flow ... more air = more temp reduction making temperature testing redundant. While the air flow is impressive, the noise is a bit high. Tho I would prefer testing on a larger radiator and the fan shroud design can result in varying amounts of blow back between fans. In addition, there are significant variations depending upon fpi. Would be nice to see testing done at low medium and high fpi, unfortunately, this triples the author's time investment. As a user who uses 1250 rpm fans limiting them to 850 max rpm to achieve user non detectable noise levels ... no real interest in 2000 rpm fans.

As for the results ... The cheap warranty and high price is disturbing ... and performance wise,

1250 rpm 31.2 cfm @ 39.9 dbA... that's > just uner 52 w/ 8 fans.

The BeQuite's are 2.6 cfm lower @ 5.7 dbA lower, Id rather have the low noise

The Phantekls lose 4.1 cfm but are 8.1 dbA quieter

If ya need the air flow, and with proper rad sizing, you wouldn't, you can do push / pull for a typical 30% increase air flow increase while expeiencing only 3 dbA extra in noise.

Still, higher air flow fans do have their place in small builds where users wear headphones or do't mind the noise.

FPI isn't everything either. Take a look at this radiator covered earlier this year: https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/HardwareLabs/Black_Ice_Nemesis_GTR_360/3.html, it has 16 FPI fins in a 54 mm thickness so if you look at those two numbers one would expect similar airflow restriction to the Black Ice Nemesis GTX but they end up on opposite ends of the spectrum with the Nemesis GTX a low-airflow optimized radiator and the Nemesis GTR a high-airflow optimized radiator with higher airflow restriction. This is why I chose a single radiator, irrespective of thickness, FPI, number of rows etc, with an average airflow restriction to help give a better idea of how these fans would fare for watercooling in general.
 
Good review, I like mine on my 360mm radiator, quiet, great airflow through the system even when it is in desperate need of cleaning.
 
I own 3 of these fans on my EK PE360 rad and I love them. First time having all PWM fans in my system and its fantastic.
 
l just had one go bad after 3 days. Returning it for another one.
 
Back, I exchanged my 6 Alphacool Susurro 120 with his new EK. They are noisier and do not cool better. pity
 
I decide to take ML140 Pro x2 for radiator.
But these Vardar are nice as well.
 
Temperature is a function of air flow ... more air = more temp reduction making temperature testing redundant. While the air flow is impressive, the noise is a bit high. Tho I would prefer testing on a larger radiator and the fan shroud design can result in varying amounts of blow back between fans. In addition, there are significant variations depending upon fpi. Would be nice to see testing done at low medium and high fpi, unfortunately, this triples the author's time investment. As a user who uses 1250 rpm fans limiting them to 850 max rpm to achieve user non detectable noise levels ... no real interest in 2000 rpm fans.

As for the results ... The cheap warranty and high price is disturbing ... and performance wise,

1250 rpm 31.2 cfm @ 39.9 dbA... that's > just uner 52 w/ 8 fans.

The BeQuite's are 2.6 cfm lower @ 5.7 dbA lower, Id rather have the low noise

The Phantekls lose 4.1 cfm but are 8.1 dbA quieter

If ya need the air flow, and with proper rad sizing, you wouldn't, you can do push / pull for a typical 30% increase air flow increase while expeiencing only 3 dbA extra in noise.

Still, higher air flow fans do have their place in small builds where users wear headphones or do't mind the noise.

I think the blade shape and motor hub diameter as well as static pressure have a lot to do with temperature as well which isn't captured with simply airflow via CFM. However this increases the difficulty of doing a review. Possibly consider doing fan benchmarking with a standardized heatsink and a 150 watt heatsource: processor or something else, maybe a TEC hot-side with a temperature probe.

CFM Airflow through radiator is a good idea, though its application for end user kind of depends on fpi variation as mentioned.

For a heatsink testing, ideally you would want something that is fairly simple in nature with a good retention system so it doesn't break thermal paste bond, and compatibility with any fan you could desire from 12cm to 14cm, something like a Noctua NH-U14s. The NH-U14S can accomodate 14cm or 12cm fans or some of the 15cm fans and has a good retention system so the thermal paste bond isn't disturbed when changing fans. The Coolermaster 212 is an example of a simplistic heatsink that performs very well but the bond can easily by disrupted because the clamping system allows it to wiggle/rotate a bit. I have a Phanteks PHTC-12DX. It is superb at remaining clamped, though it is a 120mm heatsink and doesn't really take 140mm fans well, I had to bend the fan clips to get my present 14cm fan onto it (albeit with amazing thermal results).

Still, higher air flow fans do have their place in small builds where users wear headphones or do't mind the noise.
I am one of those users and I use some very high airflow fans (deltas, yate loons) in a small build and use headphones while gaming so I don't hear it :), they are all pwm so they don't really make much noise at all idle. if you have a small case and only have a single intake and single exhaust fan you might as well use the most powerful you can find.
 
Last edited:
FPI isn't everything either. Take a look at this radiator covered earlier this year: https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/HardwareLabs/Black_Ice_Nemesis_GTR_360/3.html, it has 16 FPI fins in a 54 mm thickness so if you look at those two numbers one would expect similar airflow restriction to the Black Ice Nemesis GTX but they end up on opposite ends of the spectrum with the Nemesis GTX a low-airflow optimized radiator and the Nemesis GTR a high-airflow optimized radiator with higher airflow restriction. This is why I chose a single radiator, irrespective of thickness, FPI, number of rows etc, with an average airflow restriction to help give a better idea of how these fans would fare for watercooling in general.

Not suggesting it is ... it kinda goes without saying that when discussing a factor in perfomance "all other things being equal". A thicker rad has more resistance then a thinner one, fin design fpi, materials, etc all being equal. But when making selections, criteria must fall within certain ranges... don't expect a 6,000 pound vehicle to win any mpg awards,

I own 3 of these fans on my EK PE360 rad and I love them. First time having all PWM fans in my system and its fantastic.

PWM fans are no longer required to provide PWM like control. PWM control has ... or should I say "had" clear benefits. The upside of PWM control was greater low speed control because even at slower speeds, they still provide a 12v signal to overcome inertia of the blade assembly. Was a time where only PWM fans could do this. On the downside, a) PWM suffered from low speed clicking or hum, b) cost, c) on some brands (i.e. Corsair) you couldn't gang more than 5 or so on a single channel and d) MoBos had a limited number of PWM headers. problem is, those old posts are still being re-quoted without taking into account technology changes that have come into play since then and d) has been eliminated since Z97.... was supposed to be Z87 but even tho manuals typically said everything was PWM, MoBo manufacturers were unable to deliver that to market.

a) DCV controlled fans now are capable of much lower speeds due to changes in MoBo design which allow for ramp up and ramp down of fan speeds. In the past, when system called for low speed and hence low voltages, the signal was not strong enough voltage wise to overcome inertia and get the blade assembly moving. Now, the signal will initiate movement with a higher voltage and then slow it down thereby allowing DCV fan speeds near 20%.

b) The advent of PWM Fan PCBs which take a PWM feed from MoBo and convert the signal to DCV with the same capabilities as above.

Which way to go ? Kinda a 6 of one, half dozen of the other thing.

a) Noise - as long as ya avoid the clicky / humming PWM fan models, won't matter significantly

b) No. of fans per channel - Again, as long as ya avoid the fan numbers or models known to fail here, doesn't matter

c) Cost - depends on number of fans.... using the example from previous post, DCV are $10 / PWM $17
3 DCVs with a PWM PCB would be 3 x $10 + $20 = $50
3 PWMs would be 3 $17 = $51
So less favors PWM, more favors DCV.

In your case with 3 x 120mm, Id prolly go with PWM fans

In my case, DCV makes more sense ... I have two rads (140mm x 3 and 140mm x 2) in push / pull plus 6 case fans and MoBo has 2 CPU and 3 CHA headers.

CPU => Pump No. 1
CPU_OPT => Pump No. 2
CHA_1 = > PCB No. 1 => (6) 1,250 rpm fans in push / pull on 420mm rad
CHA_2 = > PCB No. 2 => (4) 1,250 rpm fans in push / pull on 280mm rad
CHA_3= > PCB No. 3 => (6) 1,250 rpm case fans

Fans range from 325 rpm to 550 rpm typical (gaming) ... under stress testing (RoG Real Bench + Furmark) get to 850 rpm where fans are not audible.

(5) DCV fans came with the case so ....

Cost of buying (11) more + (3) controllers was $170
Cost of buying (16) PWM fans was $272 not counting (3) ModMyToys (or Swiftech, whatever) Hubs

Hard to go wrong either way, both options deliver comparable results
 
Last edited:
Back
Top