• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Kioxia Develops New 3D Semicircular Flash Memory Cell Structure "Twin BiCS FLASH"

AleksandarK

News Editor
Staff member
Joined
Aug 19, 2017
Messages
2,249 (0.92/day)
Kioxia Corporation today announced the development of the world's first three-dimensional (3D) semicircular split-gate flash memory cell structure "Twin BiCS FLASH" using specially designed semicircular Floating Gate (FG) cells. Twin BiCS FLASH achieves superior program slope and a larger program/erase window at a much smaller cell size compared to conventional circular Charge Trap (CT) cells. These attributes make this new cell design a promising candidate to surpass four bits per cell (QLC) for significantly higher memory density and fewer stacking layers. This technology was announced at the IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) held in San Francisco, CA on December 11th.

3D flash memory technology has achieved high bit density with low cost per bit by increasing the number of cell stacked layers as well as by implementing multilayer stack deposition and high aspect ratio etching. In recent years, as the number of cell layers exceeds 100, managing the trade-offs among etch profile control, size uniformity and productivity is becoming increasingly challenging. To overcome this problem, Kioxia developed a new semicircular cell design by splitting the gate electrode in the conventional circular cell to reduce cell size compared to the conventional circular cell, enabling higher-density memory at a lower number of cell layers.


The circular control gate provides a larger program window with relaxed saturation problems when compared with a planar gate because of the curvature effect, where carrier injection through the tunnel dielectric is enhanced while electron leakage to the block (BLK) dielectric is lowered. In this split-gate cell design, the circular control gate is symmetrically divided into two semicircular gates to take advantage of the strong improvement in the program/erase dynamics. As shown in Fig. 1, the conductive storage layer is employed for high charge trapping efficiency in conjunction with the high-k BLK dielectrics, achieving high coupling ratio to gain program window as well as reduced electron leakage from the FG, thus relieving the saturation issue. The experimental program/erase characteristics in Fig. 2 reveal that the semicircular FG cells with the high-k-based BLK exhibit significant gains in the program slope and program/erase window over the larger-sized circular CT cells. The semicircular FG cells, having superior program/erase characteristics, are expected to attain comparably tight QLC Vt distributions at small cell size. Further, integration of low-trap Si channel makes possible more than four bits/cell, e.g., Penta-Level Cell (PLC) as shown in Fig. 3. These results confirm that semicircular FG cells are a viable option to pursue higher bit density.

Going forward, Kioxia's research and development efforts aimed at innovation in flash memory will include continuing Twin BiCS FLASH development and seeking its practical applications. At IEDM 2019, Kioxia also announced six other papers highlighting the company's intensive R&D activities in the area of flash memory.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
7,400 (3.88/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
And so starts the development of 5 bits per cell :(

each extra bit per cell doubles the performance penalty and controller's workload, but offers diminishing returns on extra capacity.

SLC-MLC = half the speed/endurance, double the capacity
MLC-TLC = half the speed/endurance, 50% more capacity
TLC-QLC = half the speed/endurance, 33% more capacity
QLC-PLC = half the speed/endurance, 25% more capacity

QLC is starting to takeover the lightweight mainstream but it's already the transition between cache and raw QLC performance is horrifying (like 3GB/s to 100MB/s). With PLC we're probably looking at 50MB/s performance to the RAW NAND unless Toshiba Kioxia have made this some new miracle NAND that can be programmed twice as fast as existing BiCS QLC.

A new QLC drive is plenty for a consumer but the SLC cache basically vanishes when the drive gets to 75% capacity or more. It's very easy to make an Intel 660p perform like an SD card by simply filling it to 80% and dumping another 10GB on it. The same is absolutely not true of TLC, even DRAMless TLC never gets as bad as a full 660p.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
20,995 (5.96/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor i7 8700k 4.6Ghz @ 1.24V
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Fractal Design Define R5
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse XTRFY M42
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W10 x64
And so starts the development of 5 bits per cell :(

each extra bit per cell doubles the performance penalty and controller's workload, but offers diminishing returns on extra capacity.

SLC-MLC = half the speed/endurance, double the capacity
MLC-TLC = half the speed/endurance, 50% more capacity
TLC-QLC = half the speed/endurance, 33% more capacity
QLC-PLC = half the speed/endurance, 25% more capacity

QLC is starting to takeover the lightweight mainstream but it's already the transition between cache and raw QLC performance is horrifying (like 3GB/s to 100MB/s). With PLC we're probably looking at 50MB/s performance to the RAW NAND unless Toshiba Kioxia have made this some new miracle NAND that can be programmed twice as fast as existing BiCS QLC.

A new QLC drive is plenty for a consumer but the SLC cache basically vanishes when the drive gets to 75% capacity or more. It's very easy to make an Intel 660p perform like an SD card by simply filling it to 80% and dumping another 10GB on it. The same is absolutely not true of TLC, even DRAMless TLC never gets as bad as a full 660p.

There is something for each segment. QLC and beyond is for mainstream / OEM / el cheapo desktop and notebooks. Let them have it. Choke on it. I don't care. I'm not going there and in the end its a simple case of supply and demand. Every joe and his dog wants an SSD, good, let them have QLC, so the demand on better stuff goes down.
 
Top