• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

7970 Die Size

Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
1,684 (0.32/day)
Location
State College, PA, US
System Name My Surround PC
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Motherboard ASUS STRIX X670E-F
Cooling Swiftech MCP35X / EK Quantum CPU / Alphacool GPU / XSPC 480mm w/ Corsair Fans
Memory 96GB (2 x 48 GB) G.Skill DDR5-6000 CL30
Video Card(s) MSI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Suprim X 24GB
Storage WD SN850 2TB, Samsung PM981a 1TB, 4 x 4TB + 1 x 10TB HGST NAS HDD for Windows Storage Spaces
Display(s) 2 x Viotek GFI27QXA 27" 4K 120Hz + LG UH850 4K 60Hz + HMD
Case NZXT Source 530
Audio Device(s) Sony MDR-7506 / Logitech Z-5500 5.1
Power Supply Corsair RM1000x 1 kW
Mouse Patriot Viper V560
Keyboard Corsair K100
VR HMD HP Reverb G2
Software Windows 11 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores Mellanox ConnectX-3 10 Gb/s Fiber Network Card
I stumbled across something interesting today. I looked at GPU-Z, and it has the 7970 listed at 365mm^2

5kf.png


However, AMD's recent slide for the R9 290X lists the 7970 GHz edition as 352mm^2:

Efficiency.jpg


Which is correct? Did the die size of Tahiti change due to a revision?

One thing to also mention is that the slide calls the 7970 GHz edition memory bandwidth as 264GB/s, which is obviously wrong for the GHz edition at 6GHz memory bus. The rest of the slide does correspond to the GHz edition parameters, as compared to the GPU-Z screenshot.
 
Last edited:
From Anandtech:

"At 438mm2 Hawaii is AMD’s biggest GPU yet, and despite AMD’s improvements in area efficiency Hawaii is still 73mm2 (20%) larger than Tahiti"


438mm2 - 73mm2 = 365mm2


;)
 
Some sites measure it on there own and you get a discrepancy.

Its always been 352mm2 according to AMD



*Darn that fine print gets you every time.

Wow, I didn't know that. Nice job scouring the fine print. I've seen 365mm^2 so many times on the internet that I assumed it was the actual value; it probably all came from one inaccurate measurement. I guess GPU-Z and Anandtech are wrong. Thanks for the post.
 
Last edited:
Thanks! Already fixed in next GPU-Z release.
 
Back
Top