AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

[W1zzard]

The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is based on AMD's all-new Navi 10 GPU featuring the RDNA architecture. We thoroughly test the card's gaming performance and look at power, heat, noise, overclocking, and clock frequency stability, too, sometimes with surprising results.

Show full review

 

[roccale]

Munneeeeeeezzzzzzz.

 

[Xuper]

92'c? wow.so much for 7nm , when you go lower nm , You will get more hard cap.I don't expect 5 nm or 3 nm to give miracle.

 

[rrrrex]

It's so bad for a new arcitecture, perf per watt is still lower than gtx 10x0 (7nm vs 16nm). Pretty close to vega vii. Let me hope that navi isn't full rdna.

 

[jabbadap]

92'c? wow.so much for 7nm , when you go lower nm , You will get more hard cap.I don't expect 5 nm or 3 nm to give miracle.

That's more because of crappy blower cooler these thing have(what ever amd's marketing team is saying about them). Power consumption is not much different from nvidia, slap RTX like cooler on it and those temps will go down. So yeah I would say good cards, but really need AIB custom models to really be an real option against rtx cards.

It's so bad for a new arcitecture, perf per watt is still lower than gtx 10x0 (7nm vs 16nm). Pretty close to vega vii. Let me hope that navi isn't full rdna.

Well RX 5700 equals Turings on Perf/W so it's more like XT is running with more free TDP settings.

 

[Xuper]

It's so bad for a new arcitecture, perf per watt is still lower than gtx 10x0 (7nm vs 16nm). Pretty close to vega vii. Let me hope that navi isn't full rdna.

Only RX 5700XT, RX 5700 is close to RTX 2070 super and surpassed all Pascal series cards

 

[rtwjunkie]

We repeatedly see threads of people that want to upgrade, but don’t want RTX. Many of them say they can go and get a 1080Ti and have the upgrade performance they want. Trouble is, unless you have one already, that mythical used beast is expensive.

For much less money I would advise them to get a 5700XT. It trades blows back and forth with 1080Ti, even at 2560x1440.

 

[Zubasa]

92'c? wow.so much for 7nm , when you go lower nm , You will get more hard cap.I don't expect 5 nm or 3 nm to give miracle.

Whats worse is it manage to run louder than Vega 56 while being hotter.

 

[Xuper]

RX 5700 XT's temp :
Kitguru = 80'c
Computerbase = 85'c
overclock3d = 68'c
Techradar = 81'c
TPU = 92'c

hmm , TPU got worst card.

 

[z1n0x]

1. Unreal Engine should be renamed to GeForce Engine.
2. Overall better results than i expected.
3. Custom cards!

@ any AMDer reading, you need to step up your reference card design game. Temps, noise, clocks fluctuation. Get rid of that blower once and for all!

 

[Zubasa]

RX 5700 XT's temp :
Kitguru = 80'c
Computerbase = 85'c
overclock3d = 68'c
Techradar = 81'c
TPU = 92'c

hmm , TPU got worst card.

Something is seriously wrong with this first batch of cards if there is such huge difference in temps 68 vs 92.
Especially on blower cards that are less affected by case temps, and many of these test are done in open air test bench anyway.

 

[W1zzard]

overclock3d = 68'c

I had to lol, maybe with fan at 100%

 

[Naito]

Overall, things look pretty good. Perhaps some driver updates will get the temp and power usage back into line a little. Really looking forward to the custom board reviews, though

 

[jesdals]

Nice test, well hope my 3800x and x570 motherboard give my R7 some more room

 

[jabbadap]

@W1zzard you forgot to add no VirtualLink on negatives. While it is starting to be DOA standard, leaving it off is not helping to get it adopted faster.

 

[W1zzard]

@W1zzard you forgot to add no VirtualLink on negatives. While it is starting to be DOA standard, leaving it off is not helping to get it adopted faster.

Completely irrelevant at this time imo

 

[B-Real]

I was expecting the RX5700 to be a better choice, but it's not faster by around 10% than the 2060, so giving $50 more for the RX5700 XT is a rational move.

It's so bad for a new arcitecture, perf per watt is still lower than gtx 10x0 (7nm vs 16nm). Pretty close to vega vii. Let me hope that navi isn't full rdna.

Man, it consumes 25W more than the 2070... 25W. Yes, less nm, and? You buy GPUs according to die size? And there is the undervolt. Yu I'm pretty sure it will consume less than the RTX2070. And don't forget, it's $100 less than the 2070-2070S.

 

[droopyRO]

Custom cards are expected in August, or sooner ?

 

[jabbadap]

Completely irrelevant at this time imo

Well Valve Index will have option to use Virtuallink port, needs to buy single adapter.

Spoiler: Valve index Virtualink adapter

 

[Restless_Hero]

A 5% lead over the competing green cards is somewhat underwhelming, even before taking thermals and noise into account. At this price point I'm inclined to remain in the Nvidia camp for now.

 

[dj-electric]

Have a 5700 XT, it does get to 91c -ish
I'm with W1zzard

 

[unikin]

I'll wait for price adjustment to $349 and buy AIB version then. God damn it AMD can't you deliver good drivers and decent cooling solution at release? 92 (110)C temp and 43 dBA on $400 GPU, c'mon AMD are you serious? So little added effort is needed for this GPU to get praising reviews instead of mediocre ones.

 

[Shatun_Bear]

I thought this was meant to be a disaster? Looks very competitive with Nvidia at those prices.

 

[ValenOne]

I would like to see NAVI 10 scaled by 2X via 512 bit bus GDDR6, 80 CU, four shader engines and 128 ROPS. I would like to to replace my old R9-290X with 512 bit bus PCB with updated NAVI 512 bit bus PCB. Bring on RX 5900 XT...

 

[Shatun_Bear]

A 5% lead over the competing green cards is somewhat underwhelming, even before taking thermals and noise into account. At this price point I'm inclined to remain in the Nvidia camp for now.

Yeah right, everyone was expecting a 5% deficit at least. That it has a 5% lead is a massive turn up for the books.

Custom cards will be the way to go.