• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Changes Meteor Lake Naming: "i" Removed From "i9", new Core "Ultra" Brand

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,676 (7.43/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Intel today announced its first major branding change for its client-segment Core desktop and mobile processor family in over 15 years (since the introduction of the very first Core "Nehalem"). "Core" still remains Intel's main client-segment processor brand, but the way the company draws its processor model numbers, is being significantly changed. The company is also introducing the Core Ultra brand of premium processors. The new nomenclature also sees Intel discontinue the use of "generations" within the SKU name.

The current Intel naming scheme sees the company mention processor generation before the main brand Core. For example, the 13th Gen Core is Intel's current line of client-segment products. Right next to Core, Intel places the brand extension "i" followed by the product tiering number 3, 5, 7, or 9. The product model number follows, and even this model number tends to begin with the processor generation. For example, the "i9-13900" already conveys that it is a processor from Intel's 13th Gen Core family. This is where Intel is making its two main changes.



To begin with, Intel's brand regulation will no longer include the generational string (eg: 12th Gen Core or 13th Gen Core), since the generation is already part of the model number. Next up, the brand extension "i" is about to be dropped. Core i7, for example, will become simply Core 7. If we were to apply the new naming scheme on the "13th Gen Intel Core i7-13900," for example, it would be called simply "Intel Core 7-13900."


Intel is also introducing the new Core Ultra brand. This was probably done to deal with the overlap of a significantly newer architecture with an older architecture already being in the market, wherein Intel wouldn't want to retire the older architecture. Toward late 2023 or early 2024, Intel will be faced with having to market both processors based on the "Raptor Lake" architecture (which is rumored to be getting a major product-stack refresh in 2H-2023), and the upcoming "Meteor Lake" architecture. When Intel's Core Ultra branding takes effect, customers will be able to tell "Meteor Lake" based SKUs apart from those based on "Raptor Lake," but looking for the Ultra brand.


The Ultra brand extension could hence allow Intel to gracefully transition the market between processor architecture generations, and improve inventory digestion in the channel for the outgoing architecture. The main Core branding now includes three tiers—Core 3, Core 5, and Core 7. The Core Ultra brand includes the tiers Core Ultra 5, Core Ultra 7, and Core Ultra 9. The Ultra branding allows Intel to position certain enthusiast-grade SKUs within a generation (possibly Unlocked K/KF) with the Core Ultra brand.

The new branding will take effect around the time Intel launches its next-generation "Meteor Lake" microarchitecture, with its first SKUs debuting within the second half of 2023.

"Our client roadmap demonstrates how Intel is prioritizing innovation and technology leadership with products like Meteor Lake, focused on power efficiency and AI at scale. To better align with our product strategies, we are introducing a branding structure that will help PC buyers better differentiate the best of our latest technology and our mainstream offerings," said Caitlin Anderson, Intel vice president and general manager of Client Computing Group Sales.


Intel also announced new case badge designs for Intel Evo, the company's premium thin-and-light notebook design specification brand, and the vPro brand that the company uses for its commercial desktop and commercial notebook processors. For consumer notebooks that need outer box labeling of the brand of processor and graphics powering it, Intel developed two additional badges.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
The string of numbers with no letter immediately confused my brain. The "i7" moniker was much easier to understand at a glance.
 
The "core" font just hurts my eyes.
homer simpson what GIF
 
The "Core 5" has 10 or 14 cores, not 5 cores. How is that not confusing for your average joe?

We're still all going to call it an i5 since the "i" is for "intel" whether Intel want it or not.
 
They made it worse in recent years with the E cores, but this sounds demonstrably worse than that!
Screen_shot.png
 
It would be better to move to "X100" and beyond rather than burying a well-known and well-established nomenclature.
 
1686835686888.png
Yeaaaah.
 
The "Core 5" has 10 or 14 cores, not 5 cores. How is that not confusing for your average joe?

We're still all going to call it an i5 since the "i" is for "intel" whether Intel want it or not.
A core i9 can have less "cores" than core i5 & still cost more!
 
So, if Intel releases a mobile unlocked SKU, would it be an Ultra -MK?
:laugh:
 
Ah man, slide 3 makes it look like they're using the terrible naming that AMD switched to where some random number in the string tells you what architecture it has, but it's not the first digit. Quick, which processor is faster, the Core 7 14564 or the Core 7 14655?! Hint: you're wrong.
 
The "Core 5" has 10 or 14 cores, not 5 cores. How is that not confusing for your average joe?

We're still all going to call it an i5 since the "i" is for "intel" whether Intel want it or not.
This. Anyone saying ultra is an idiot :D I'd immediately follow up on that with an overemphasized ULTRA muhahaha
 
Some marketing wankateer has earned their obscene salary today. Remember always look at the hand they don't want you to - smoke and mirrors.
 
I still don't see how the previously known i3 is Ultra. Yes they can have an unlocked version but it's still not Ultra anything. It's entry level. Even the i5 isn't Ultra.

The Marketing Dept at Intel are smoking weed and making decisions I think.
 
Maybe they should fix their messy naming scheme, i7 can mean anything from useless laptop CPU to high end desktop, and then the number of cores.
AMD isn't better either.
 
Logo simplicity: i like
"Core" size/font: smaller please
"ULTRA": Weird seeing they're gonna ditch the iconic "i" for a 5 letter word you'd expect on a kids RC toy

tbh, i'm not that bothered. I'd take anything and everything providing next Gen desktop chips are competitively superior, efficient, less of a power hog compared to 13th gen and reasonably positioned on the pricing ladder. If you've got all that, call it what you like, call it "Super dooper smashy smashy mega rocket speed sadistically ultra fast" and i'll take it with a smile

Fql2WUOFYSuSFOyQ.jpg
 
It feels like we have come full circle on this one:
Intel stats with an i3 i5 i7 naming
Amd copies the scheme With A instead of i and with 4 6 9 instead of 3 5 7
Amd copies the 3 5 7 scheme but drops the letter
And now intel copies AMD by dropping the letter.

A bit of an simpification but still
 
It feels like we have come full circle on this one:
Intel stats with an i3 i5 i7 naming
Amd copies the scheme With A instead of i and with 4 6 9 instead of 3 5 7
Amd copies the 3 5 7 scheme but drops the letter
And now intel copies AMD by dropping the letter.

A bit of an simpification but still

lol

it would be hilarious if AMD adopted i3, i5, i7 and dropped the "ultra" bomb at the end of it. A completed CIRCLING CYCLE!
 
It feels like we have come full circle on this one:
Intel stats with an i3 i5 i7 naming
Amd copies the scheme With A instead of i and with 4 6 9 instead of 3 5 7
Amd copies the 3 5 7 scheme but drops the letter
And now intel copies AMD by dropping the letter.

A bit of an simpification but still
Then Intel reuses that "A" to denote imaginary tenths of an imaginary nanometer in their chip printing shop.
 
More evidence of smaller gaps between releases, 6 month release schedules with overlapping stock, its easier for consumers to make mistakes when ordering with these changes.
 
Allow Intel to gracefully mislead the customers* Fixed it for ya. Doesn't mean much for the aware DIY market but a lot for OEM-digesting victims.
 
Back
Top