• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Intel Core i7 Mobile - first benchmarks

10TaTioN

New Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2009
Messages
257 (0.04/day)
Location
Portugal
Processor Intel Core 2 Duo Q9550 @ 3.833Ghz [Stable]
Motherboard ASUS P5Q Pro
Cooling Xigmatek HDT-S1283
Memory Team Group DDR2 Xtreem Dark PC2-8500 @ 902Mhz
Video Card(s) PNY GTX 570
Storage Western Digital 1TB WD10EARS
Case AeroCool AeroEngine II
Software Windows 7 x64 RTM
Benchmark Scores http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=754350
Q720_1,6_GHz.png


Core i7 Mobile: First performance results
We took a look at the first pre-production systems from Acer, Asus and MSI. To check the performance we ran Cinebench R10 that converts every available core and thread into better results. The mobile Core i7 CPUs don't only benefit from SMT, but also from the active Turbo Mode. In the Asus M60J the Core i7-820M (1.6 GHz) was feeling so well that it was running with additional 133 MHz constantly although all four cores were stressed to the max. The results are quite high, what is typical for Core i7 processors, since parallel programmed applications benefit a lot from the Nehalem architecture. Intel advertises with 80 to 100 percent increased rendering performance (video editing & Co.) in comparison to equally priced Core 2 quad-cores. But they don't mention that not a single game, except Anno 1404: Dawn of Discovery, benefits from Hyperthreading - quite the contrary is the case: In most cases the feature costs up to 20 percent performance.

Clarksfield_Benchmarks_090923173606.png
 
Last edited:
Opps "No deeplinking"
 
Back
Top